View Single Post
Old May 2nd, 2004, 12:48 PM   Digg it!   #1 (permalink)
videobruce
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 373
Printer connection; USB vs parallel

I have always used a parallel port for my printers. My first one didn't have USB, the onbe I have now does, but I use the parallel port since:
1. Is it mainly for a printer, I have nothing else that would/could us it.
2. Why tie up a USB port when the other decicated port is there and I have the cable?

BUT, is there:
1. Less processor usage using a USB port?
2. Faster data transfer (USB 1.1 that is)?

I notice when I send a larger 'job' to the printer it really 'chokes' the processor, maxes it out until the job is done. I don't know if it is a port issue or something else.

Specs:
2k, w/sp4 14 processes running at startup
AMD 2100b Throughbred
nForce2 MB
512 MB PC2700

Last edited by videobruce : May 2nd, 2004 at 01:08 PM.
videobruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Search TechIMO for Answers: