View Single Post
Old June 17th, 2006, 10:01 AM     #3 (permalink)
nwo75200
Full Time WoW Addict
 
nwo75200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 8,564
Send a message via MSN to nwo75200
The 6200, even then best version of it, cannot reach the performance of a 9800 series card. The only case when it might come close is if we were to compare a 9800SE against the best 6200. The 6200 is the low end card of the 6 series from Nvidia. It compares with the mid range graphics cards of the previous generation. Those would include the 9600 series such as an ATI 9600pro or a 9600XT or a 5700 or a 5700U from Nvidia.

I agree with sweeper2, if you're gonna buy a new graphics card, you should be looking no lower than a 6600GT if you wish to play games on decent settings without lag. But for a 6600GT you would have to spend at least twice as much as you would on a 6200. A 6600GT can be had for under $100, and it's well worth it. The 6200 you found for around $30 must be one of the worst versions, in which case you might as well use onboard graphics (if available) because the 6200 won't be much better.

But, if you're not a gamer, then by all means you should get that 6200. It will serve you well for everything but gaming.
__________________
-NWO®

---6000 point club-----
A64 X2 4600+
2x512MB Geil DDR500
2x512MB Kingmax DDR500
@DDR266 speeds
Sapphire x1900GT
nwo75200 is offline   Reply With Quote