+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    24

    Post ..

     
    ..
    Last edited by sensormatic; June 22nd, 2007 at 06:58 PM.

  2. #2
    Ultimate Member Smidley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,525
    I don't think they will, but I could be wrong as it's just a guess.

  3. #3
    Goverment property now GroundZero3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    33,810
    Blog Entries
    46
    win2k is being phased out so users will move to xp

  4. #4
    the *Voice* in your Head PresterJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    4,519
    not too sure about w2k-pro but i would imagine that w2k srv/adv.srvr will probably go thru one more service pack.

    since the kernel is eseentially the same across the entire w2k OS family, i wouldn't be too surprised if someone hacks a future server only SP (if that scenario ever occurs) to work on the workstation as well.

    in the meantime, windowsupdate still supports w2k-pro.

    me...i'm a die-hard w2k fan & i'll probably continue using the OS even when MS drops support altogether. and if judging by my first-hand observations of xp sp2, if MS decides not to release sp5...well, that might not be a bad thing either.

  5. #5
    Registered User EpyonMelee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,149
    Quote Originally Posted by GroundZero3
    win2k is being phased out so users will move to xp

    really????

    that OS was so badass, how can they do that, its only been out for what, 5 years?

  6. #6
    the *Voice* in your Head PresterJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    4,519
    Quote Originally Posted by EpyonMelee
    really????

    that OS was so badass, how can they do that, its only been out for what, 5 years?
    w2k is a badass OS!...the problem is that MS is so revenue hungry that they know their customers won't buy their newer products unless they force them to by dint of stopping support on the older software. the fact that you can install a single copy of w2k on essentially an unlimited number of machines (not legally, i know) also isn't making the 6-figure salaried executives in Redmond any happier either!

    this approach isn't just for their operating system business...it stretches across their entire product line, esp. their office suite.

    plenty of satisfied users still using either Office 97 or 2000 but if MS had their way, everyone would have to upgrade to office xp.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Creating partitions use multiple OS
    By quiksan in forum Technical Support
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: July 12th, 2004, 10:32 AM
  2. Need help with Os choice
    By street dj in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: February 27th, 2003, 01:13 PM
  3. Superbike 2001 on XP?
    By Agent_Embryo in forum General Gaming Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: January 30th, 2003, 03:59 PM
  4. Problem with Access 2000 and VB 6
    By korgul in forum Webmastering and Programming
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: March 14th, 2002, 12:16 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Recommended Sites: ResellerRatings Store Reviews