XP kicks 2000's butt

[CrazyCase]

Ok a lot of people hate xp's autoregistration via the web and "auto" features, well compared to 2000, i have to say xp pro rocks.

[Juztyn]

I second that, the part that XpPro rox :P

[Epyon9283]

Win2k rocks. XP does not. I would say what I really think about it but profanity is a no-no on this board.

[Juztyn]

What makes you not like XP?
I like it just because I can be lazy, I normally use 2k, but XP auto config's everything =)

[Skywalker[TSG]]

WinXP seems so slow compared to Win2k

also win2k has SP3 wich means its more secure and reliable then XP.

[Martee]

.NET Server rocks.

[Skywalker[TSG]]

Yeah it might but not many people use that in their home computers/workstations

[GroundZero3]

ill stick with win2k

[Epyon9283]

Quote:

Originally posted by Juztyn
What makes you not like XP?
I like it just because I can be lazy, I normally use 2k, but XP auto config's everything =)

XP hogs too much ram. When I had XP, it would take more ram at startup with no programs running than win2k running apache, mysql, and rage3d tweak.

[PresterJohn]

the only butt that XP kicks, is its own.

w2k all the way, baby!

edit: wanna know what i call people that use XP?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
beta testers