Windows XP Home & Professional Comparision  | |
December 5th, 2001, 10:43 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Xtreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 7,880
| Windows XP Home & Professional Comparision |
| |
December 5th, 2001, 11:03 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Not an OWO yet, just OLD!
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Uh, Central Oregon
Posts: 5,718
|
Hey NDC --
It does support NTFS, but it doesn't give the the same amount of Security controls over your files as the XP Pro version does.
I've installed WinXP Home Edition on several machines lately, and in the case of up-grades, I had the choice, but left them using FAT32.
I did one WINXP yesterday with a clean install using an Up-grade disk and formated and loaded that one in NTFS.
Harder |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 12:55 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Xtreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 7,880
|
Ok, thanks Sharder!
Yeah, I was kinda trippin out that NTFS was not supported in XP Home Edition... So it's just the security features that's excluded... Thanks!  |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 03:31 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | addicted
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,103
|
NTFS is still there and I think you still have all the NTFS security. It looks like the Encrypting File System has been left out though. That encryption and access to encrypted files are all automatic (once enabled and selected for a folder or file) in XP Pro (and W2K). This is actually a very nice feature that doesn't seem widely used.
Last edited by DVNT1 : December 6th, 2001 at 03:33 AM.
|
| |
December 6th, 2001, 04:15 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Oceanside CA
Posts: 1,804
|
Looking at the details it looks like Pro supports Dynamic Disk (which includes File Sys encryption, Quota Management, and Striping) and Home version only allows Basic Disk.
I usually recommend any client only use Basic Disk unless it is a server. Unless you actually take advantage of Dynamic Disk featues it just adds extra overhead and slows disk access (although only slightly). A Dynamic Disk also has a way of "locking" drive letter assignment when moved from one WinXP/2k system to another.
Anyways, if needed a Basic Disk can be upgraded to a Dynamic Disk without loosing existing data.
BTW...I found that our laptops cannot be updated to use Dynamic Disk anyways! |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 04:26 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Not an OWO yet, just OLD!
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Uh, Central Oregon
Posts: 5,718
|
DVNT1 --
Just out of curiousity (sp), how can all the security still be there if Quote: |
It looks like the Encrypting File System has been left out though. That encryption and access to encrypted files are all automatic (once enabled and selected for a folder or file) in XP Pro (and W2K).
| There are a couple other security functions that have also been left out of XP home edition, and that is why I stated Quote: |
doesn't give the the same amount of Security controls over your files as the XP Pro version does
| Just being nitpicky! 
Harder |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 08:55 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | |
NTFS is there in Home but maybe not with all the bells and whistles. Who knows.
I stick to FAT32. | |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 02:28 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | addicted
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,103
|
Wow, those Eagle eyes of yours sharder8 don't miss anything!
I was really just thinking of NDC's "So it's just the security features that's excluded" comment when I replied. Since NTFS has many security related attributes (other than Encrypt.) that's what I tried to relate to. Not so much that that DSF is a security feature, I think it is more like a file system/accessability feature. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |