home hardware prices news articles forums photos user reviews
Go Back   Tech Support Forums - TechIMO.com > PC Hardware and Tech > Applications and Operating Systems
Ask a Tech Support Question (free)!

Block Size on RAID Disk Array?

Reply
Get bargains at  »  Dealighted.com
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Currently Active Users: 1510
Discussions: 200,903, Posts: 2,378,875, Members: 246,272
Old June 26th, 2003, 02:05 PM   Digg it!   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Morehead City, NC
Posts: 218
Question
Block Size on RAID Disk Array?

I am setting up a RAID controller (Adaptec 1200A; Highpoint chip-w, 2- Maxtor 40G 7200 ATA133) and need some suggestions about block size. My options are 16, 32, 64; what would be the best size? I am thinking that I can get less waste with a 32 block size? I do very little video editing, so, I do not think that I need a large block size. What would you use a 16KB block size for?

Thanks for the help

ChrisK
ChrisK2972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2003, 02:07 PM     #2 (permalink)
Did you try Google yet?
 
Siliconjunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 3,468
Send a message via AIM to Siliconjunkie
I would think that 16 would waste less space since the total #/size of the blocks could be within 16k of the actual size of the data. I could be completely wrong though.
__________________
My computer is bigger than yours!
Siliconjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2003, 02:16 PM     #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Morehead City, NC
Posts: 218
I was reading my manual for a Promise Fast Trak 100 controller. It indicates that a small block size would be used for a file server where there were numerous small files. Large block size would be better for like Video editing, ect, where you are working with primarily large files. A medium block size is used for a typical home computer where there is usually a combination of both large and small files.

I am not sure how accurate this information is, but, it kinda make sense. Anyone know for sure what the best route to take is? I mean even if you do do allot of video editing, why not set the size to 16 so as to waste less space. What you say, Siliconjunkie, sounds logical to me. But, computers are not always logical
__________________
ChrisK> Certified computer crash dummy. Got a tweak you've never tried? Give it to me; if I can't crash it, it cannot be crashed!

Last edited by ChrisK2972 : June 26th, 2003 at 02:20 PM.
ChrisK2972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 2nd, 2003, 03:33 PM     #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3
NTFS Cluster size?

Let me expand on the original question....

What are your thoughts on the NTFS Cluster size vs. the RAID block size? Should they match?

In my case, I mainly use my computer for internet browsing and DVD ripping. So I set my RAID volume for a block size of 64K (for video editing) and then partitioned it into different "virtual" drives, each with different NTFS cluster sizes. For example, the drive for Windows XP and programs has a cluster size set to 4K, but the drive for my DVD rips is set to 64K.

By doing so, I thought I would get the benefit of both worlds, but sometimes I believe the RAID block size it too big for my day-to-day stuff and perhaps it slows my computer down when it has to handle the small files. So maybe I should have set my RAID block size to 32K as a comprise.

Dave
waterdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 3rd, 2003, 10:17 AM     #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve R Jones
If you’re doing raid 0 for preformance, the large the block size the more “preformance at a price” you get.

Can you expand a little more..."the more performance at a price"...what price?
waterdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 3rd, 2003, 02:00 PM     #6 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
Kuasimodem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holmen, Wisconsin US
Posts: 2,855
Send a message via MSN to Kuasimodem Send a message via Yahoo to Kuasimodem
I'm running WindowsXP Pro SP1, NTFS, RAID 0 with 2 80Gb Maxtor ATA133 drives (3 partitions + 2Gb Pagefile partition) on a KD7-RAID mobo with onboard HPT372 controller. I'm running a 4k cluster size on XP with 16k stripes on the RAID array. This way I get 4 clusters per stripe, and a 1k text file will only take up 1 4k cluster.

My Sandra benchmarks give me a rating of approximately 41000.

Go with 16k stripes, leave your NTFS cluster size at the default 4k, and you will be very happy with the performance/disk size ballance
__________________
What did a tornado sound like before freight trains were invented?
Kuasimodem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 3rd, 2003, 03:05 PM     #7 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3
So let me see if I understand you correctly...
If I set my RAID block size to 64K, then my little 1k text file will be written to the hard drives as 64K? ...and this is done regardless of what my NTFS cluster size.

For example ... in one of my partitions, I have the cluster size set to 4K, with my stripe block size set to 64K (so that's 16 NTFS clusters per RAID block, right). So if my computer decides to save this little 1K text file, will it write the text file into one NTFS cluster, then "pad" the rest of the RAID block with 15 empty clusters?

Dave
waterdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 3rd, 2003, 06:42 PM     #8 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
Kuasimodem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holmen, Wisconsin US
Posts: 2,855
Send a message via MSN to Kuasimodem Send a message via Yahoo to Kuasimodem
Close... The other 15 clusters will be filled with other files. Windows doesn't see the striping of the RAID array, the stripes are only a reference for the RAID controller. Windows sees one huge hard drive (in my case 160Gb).
Kuasimodem is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Most Active Discussions
Is It Just Me? (2799)
Is the PSU I received dead? (10)
Install XP pro and a Vista laptop ?.. (7)
California Passes Anti-Flat-HDTV Le.. (38)
A good PSU? (10)
Foreign voltage (5)
New Computer wont recognize XP disc (7)
Fox uses old news clips to inflate .. (33)
HIS HD5770 graphic card question (10)
Dept. of HS: NSA 'Helped' Develop V.. (12)
Print spooler problem (5)
EVGA 9800 gtx help with finding a g.. (6)
Ideal cheap graph card for PC-Gamin.. (13)
Mysterious Boot manager (9)
Recent Discussions
Need hard disk drivers (3)
Cloning old drive to new drive (6)
Asus P4G8X Mobo (0)
Amptron monitor G17FP-Black (0)
windows vista security holes (0)
EVGA 9800 gtx help with finding a goo.. (6)
A good PSU? (10)
Install XP pro and a Vista laptop ?? (7)
Is the PSU I received dead? (10)
Ideal cheap graph card for PC-Gaming? (13)
HP Pavillion Laptop ze4220 won't turn.. (7)
HIS HD5770 graphic card question (10)
Dept. of HS: NSA 'Helped' Develop Vis.. (12)
Foreign voltage (5)
Convert 5 pin Keyboard to USB (11)
Print spooler problem (5)
hybernate option (2)
Steam ID's, Gamertags etc... (1)
New Computer wont recognize XP disc (7)
World's largest Monopoly Game using G.. (328)
Modern Warfare 2: Who Bought It? (60)
[F@H SPAM 11/16/09] ! 1/2 months to r.. (28)
blender help (2)
Hard drive freezes boot (1)
Mysterious Boot manager (9)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 AM.
TechIMO Copyright 2009 All Enthusiast, Inc.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28