-
August 11th, 2007, 02:14 PM #1
Push for an Ocean Protection Treaty
-------------------------------------------------------------
World Wildlife Fund's Conservation Action Network ACT NOW TO SAVE LIFE ON EARTH
-------------------------------------------------------------
Calls are needed now from citizens across the United States to urge Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.) to hold a hearing on the international Law of the Sea Convention.
It's easy to make a call. See below for the phone number and a few simple points to make. Your call will make a huge difference.
Now may be our best chance in history to convince the U.S. Senate to ratify the Law of the Sea treaty, which fosters sustainable ocean use, protects navigation, and serves as a dynamic, living constitution for the world's oceans. The convention has been ratified by 152 countries and the European Commission. It has the support of President Bush and a wide range of interest groups.
Sen. Biden is chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which must review and vote on the treaty before the full Senate can take it up. Unfortunately, he has yet to schedule a hearing even though he promised months ago to work to move the treaty forward. Tell Sen.
Biden that protecting our imperiled oceans is vital.
Two-thirds of the world's surface is covered by oceans. This huge resource is under stress from overfishing, pollution and global warming and needs to be protected by all of the world's nations working together.
ACT NOW
* Call Sen. Biden's office at 202-224-5042.
* Make these points
- Hello, I'm calling because I want Sen. Biden to know that I'm a strong supporter of the Law of the Sea treaty.
- The United States needs to ratify the Law of the Sea treaty immediately.
- I urge Sen. Biden to schedule a hearing immediately on the Law of the Sea treaty.
- Does Sen. Biden plan to hold a hearing soon?
- Please tell him how important this is to me and thank you for your time.
* Tell us how it went
Want to learn more about the Law of the Sea treaty before you call?
Thank you for speaking out for the future of our oceans and the web of life they sustain.
Sincerely,
William M. Eichbaum
Managing Director and Vice President
Marine Portfolio
World Wildlife Fund
P.S. Please forward this alert to others who might want to help save our seas.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Conservation Action Network Home
World Wildlife Fund, 1250 24th Street, NW, Washington DC 20037
©2007 World Wildlife Fund
================
Take other actions:
http://worldwildlife.org/oceans/
What You Can Do
Here are four steps you can take to reduce the impact on marine ecosystems and species:
* Environmentalists everywhere can submit creative solutions to reduce bycatch. The winning Smart Gear designer receives a $30,000 grand prize
Protect marine wildlife, join our Smart Gear competition.
* Be an informed consumer of fish and other seafood. Ask where the fish comes from and the status of the fishery.
Learn about WWF and the Marine Stewardship Council.
* Avoid purchasing over-exploited stocks such as Atlantic swordfish, wild-caught Atlantic salmon, and sharks.
[goto popup] Check out WWF's "Fish Yes List."[/popup]
* Avoid products from fisheries with excessive levels of bycatch.
Visit Cetacean Bycatch Resource Center to learn more.
* Choose to buy marine ornamentals from responsible aquarium industry operators who provide healthy, high quality animals from well-managed coral reefs. Learn more about the Marine Aquarium Council and its certification process.
-
August 12th, 2007, 12:42 PM #2Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- California, USA
- Posts
- 361
Thank you Socal--excellent post!
I would like to add Seafood Watch to your list:
http://www.seafoodwatch.org
They have neat little pocket guides for different areas with current information on the best seafood choices to make. The Monterey Bay Aquarium website is really informative in general.
-
August 12th, 2007, 03:05 PM #3Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Oldsmar
- Posts
- 340
Why is this sticked in the WRONG FORUM? It is a political issue!
-
August 13th, 2007, 02:34 PM #4
Thanks for the added link, Angela. Of the many critical Earth issues these days, our ocean's health and attention to its fish and marine stocks are urgently so.
-
August 13th, 2007, 11:08 PM #5
While I think the "dungeon" should be abolished to begin with, I definitely see a double standard with posting this outside of the debate forum. Heck, I was shot down with a request to post a thread on getting out to vote outside of the dungeon.
But those who make the rules need not abide by them.
Where's the beef? Here's the beef.
-
August 13th, 2007, 11:26 PM #6
SJ, threads can be moved easily enough. In fact, we do it all the time. It is not a big deal, so why try to make it one? Is it because the thread poster has the power to sticky a thread?
Socalgal has volunteered many years to this community in both official and unofficial roles. If you want to complain about administrative policies, chose your target more wisely, as in drop me a line or even file a moderation staff report.Robert Richmond | Infinite perceptions. One reality.
TechIMO.com Editor-in-Chief
-
August 13th, 2007, 11:34 PM #7
Back on topic, thanks for the info Socal.
In addition to the provided links, Wikipedia surpisingly offers a decent breakdown of US positions regarding UNCLOS/LOST.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_...n-ratification
Of particular interest, President Bush suggests the Senate should approve UNCLOS/LOST, even if certain reasons (maritime military, mining) perhaps might not be entirely aligned with the agendas of those predominately seeking the environmental aspects of the convention.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0070515-2.htmlRobert Richmond | Infinite perceptions. One reality.
TechIMO.com Editor-in-Chief
-
August 14th, 2007, 11:00 AM #8
As you can see from the Wikipedia link, the US (starting with Reagan) refused to sign UNCLOS because it felt that its economic interests in seabed mining were insufficiently protected. Now that Russia is planting titanium flags on the seabed at 90° N, the Bush Administration is suddenly interested. That doesn't make signing a bad thing to do, but it does suggest that things are never simple.
In judging a two-person singing contest, never award the prize to the second soprano having heard only the first.
-- Francis Bator
-
August 14th, 2007, 11:25 AM #9
IMO, this is an environmental issue and it was posted as such. The sole purpose was not to spark debate on politics, which is inevitable, apparently, but to bring attention to the dire plight of our oceans and marine life in the hopes of getting people - even one person - to pick up the phone, donate, forward an email, become more aware and informed, become more interested and concerned, and/or otherwise help.
Thanks for the added info/links, Robert.
Interesting post, Theo. Indeed, things are never simple, unfortunately - especially on matters that should be.
-
August 14th, 2007, 06:34 PM #10
-
August 15th, 2007, 07:11 AM #11Ultimate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 2,574
Illegal fishing for high priced delicacies is decimating the shark population.
http://www.cdu.edu.au/ser/FishBanditsHeraldSun.htm
Greed is fueling this evil trade. The poachers will travel thousands of miles to find an easy catch.
Be aware of what you eat.
-
October 9th, 2007, 10:48 AM #12
An update:
United States Moves Closer to Joining Ocean Protection Treaty
Included are transcripts of the hearings held in September and October, by notables in the Defense Department, Navy, and others.
In part:
All Campaign results.Thank you! More than 200 WWF supporters took the time to call Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, urging him to hold a hearing on the international Law of the Sea Convention. They succeeded -- Sen. Biden held a hearing in September 2007, at which the Bush administration strongly supported ratification of the treaty. Private sector and nongovernmental organization representatives testified at a second hearing in October.
The Foreign Relations Committee must approve the treaty before it can be ratified by the Senate. The Law of the Sea Convention is an international treaty that fosters sustainable ocean use, protects navigation, and serves as a dynamic, living constitution for the world's oceans.
-
October 9th, 2007, 02:31 PM #13Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- California, USA
- Posts
- 361
Thanks for the update!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Yes, the ocean is really that big
By RedFury in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 19Last Post: August 19th, 2006, 11:09 PM -
Star Ocean
By -FMA in forum General Gaming DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: January 21st, 2005, 07:59 PM -
UN Blocks Global Treaty Banning Cloning
By Theophylact in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 4Last Post: December 9th, 2003, 02:30 PM -
time to go surfing or swimming in the ocean
By capybara in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 2Last Post: June 21st, 2002, 09:30 PM -
Ocean Eleven
By GroundZero3 in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 3Last Post: December 11th, 2001, 11:52 PM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote




Now for some bad news... Crunchyroll - "Genshiken: Second Generation" Recasts More Returning Characters
Thread About Anime