March 6th, 2008, 06:34 PM #1
Weather Channel Founder wants to sue All Gore for Fraud.
Founder claims that the Weather Channel has lost its way.
The Weather Channel has been an outlet for global warming alarmism. In December 2006, The Weather Channel’s Heidi Cullen argued on her blog that weathercasters who had doubts about human influence on global warming should be punished with decertification by the American Meteorological Society.
Coleman also told the audience his strategy for exposing what he called “the fraud of global warming.” He advocated suing those who sell carbon credits, which would force global warming alarmists to give a more honest account of the policies they propose.
“[I] have a feeling this is the opening,” Coleman said. “If the lawyers will take the case – sue the people who sell carbon credits. That includes Al Gore. That lawsuit would get so much publicity, so much media attention. And as the experts went to the witness stand and testified, I feel like that could become the vehicle to finally put some light on the fraud of global warming.”
.They say technology slows down for no one. I know it outruns my wallet. I figure its because my wallet isn't light enough yet.
TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!
dulce bellum inexpertis
March 6th, 2008, 06:37 PM #2
Im still baffeled that we as a people and we as a nation cannot just forget about that for 5 minutes, and concentrate about fixing issues with our nation FIRST... then worrying about things that are out of our control.... such as the climate and weather.He who seeks vengeance must dig two graves. One for his enemy, and one for himself.-- Lao Tzu
March 6th, 2008, 07:09 PM #3
Some very vocal people need a cause to bring any semblance of value to otherwise pathetic meaning-less lives. It's the "'ol pioneer spirit" in them to dictate how others should live theirs. They never give up. Another Cause Du Juor will arrive soon when the previous one expired or was discounted as hogwash.
March 6th, 2008, 09:18 PM #4
Coleman is not a scientist nor does he have any valid science to show. He's been scientifically shown his errors in his thinking but yet he just keeps on pushing his tired old arguments. This is not a sceptic. This is a denier. We've dealt with him here on techimo recently.
The 2008 International Conference on Climate Change was not a science conference. It was a propaganda strategy meeting for deniers. Articles such as this is what to expect from that very conference.
The last thing Coleman would want would be to have science go to the court room. See Kitzmiller Vs. Dover.When those who believe in any of the available gods understand why they deny all other gods, they should come to understand why atheists lack a belief in theirs.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By mcgregor in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 3Last Post: October 1st, 2007, 05:34 PM
By thekingofpain in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 7Last Post: June 22nd, 2004, 11:59 AM
By Mike in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 2Last Post: March 22nd, 2004, 02:46 AM