-
March 31st, 2008, 02:33 PM #1
Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling on Illegal FBI Search
Cold Cash Jefferson may yet skate:
Let's hope they have enough legally obtained evidence to put him away.WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday let stand a lower court ruling that the F.B.I. went too far in searching the office of Representative William J. Jefferson, a Louisiana Democrat accused of using his position to promote business deals in Africa.
Without comment, the justices declined to review a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which concluded last August that agents had violated the Constitution by the methods it used in the May 2006 search.
The appeals court did not find that the raid itself was unconstitutional; rather, it found that the F.B.I. violated constitutional separation of powers by allowing agents to look freely through Congressional files for incriminating evidence.
The ruling last August told the bureau to return legislative documents to Mr. Jefferson. It did not, however, affect other items seized from his office, including computer hard drives. Nor did it affect evidence seized in a separate raid on the Congressman’s Washington-area home, including $90,000 found wrapped in aluminum foil in frozen-food containers in his kitchen freezer.
The 18-hour search of Mr. Jefferson’s office on Capitol Hill marked the first time that the F.B.I. had searched a Congressional office, and it touched off a clash between the Bush administration and lawmakers of both parties. Mr. Jefferson has been indicted on charges of bribery, racketeering, conspiracy, money laundering and obstruction of justice. He has pleaded not guilty. The Justice Department said last August that the circuit court ruling would not affect the prosecution of Mr. Jefferson.
The ruling that the Supreme Court declined to review held that the F.B.I.’s use of a “filter team” to examine the evidence from the Congressman’s office to determine what was clearly legislative, and therefore out of bounds, was not adequate to protect Congress’s constitutional right to operate without interference from the executive branch.In judging a two-person singing contest, never award the prize to the second soprano having heard only the first.
-- Francis Bator
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Supreme Court REJECTS ACLU challenge on illegal wiretapping
By no1_vern in forum DebateIMO: Politics, Religion, ControversyReplies: 0Last Post: February 19th, 2008, 09:54 PM -
Role of the Supreme Court
By DesertFox01 in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 5Last Post: November 15th, 2005, 09:40 AM -
As if the U.S. Supreme Court doesn't have enough to do...
By M_Six in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 4Last Post: April 20th, 2004, 06:48 PM -
BS Court Ruling
By Mr. Goodbytes in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 47Last Post: February 5th, 2003, 02:14 PM -
Very scary court ruling
By Undeadlord in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 33Last Post: January 20th, 2003, 10:05 AM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote

Err...Uhmm..may I ask a seemingly naïve question...Why would a "mass murderer" want, of all things, a high-precision long-distance accuracy weapon? Did I understand it correctly? it waits for its...
The perfect gift for an aspiring...