-
April 16th, 2008, 01:55 PM #1
Court Upholds NYC Restaurant Calorie Requirement
With the recent discussion on nutrition, I found it interesting to note a federal court has sided with New York City in requiring restaurants to list caloric amounts for their food.
Judge Richard Holwell says in a ruling Wednesday that the law is a reasonable approach to the city's goal of reducing obesity.
The new law takes effect on April 21 and applies to restaurants with more than 15 outlets across the country.
Source: Google (Associated Press)Robert Richmond | Infinite perceptions. One reality.
TechIMO.com Editor-in-Chief
-
April 16th, 2008, 02:58 PM #2
Reasonable approach? Isn't it obvious what food is good for and what's not? This won't change a thing out there.
How about the government actually doing us all a favor...instead of wasting tax dollars on pointless programs, tell the obese to get off their lazy***, eat right and exercise. But nooo....that would be telling people to take responsibility for their own actions!Main PC: AMD FX-8350 / 16gb DDR3 1600 / AMD 7970GE 1200mhz Core & 1600mhz Mem / Win7 Pro 64bit
File Server: AMD Opteron 180 / 3gb DDR400 / Nvidia 6200 / WinXP Home 32bit / Lubuntu 12.10
Laptop: HP-Compaq nc8430/ Intel CoreDuo T2400 / 2gb DDR2 667/ Ati x1600 / WinXP Pro 32bit
-
April 16th, 2008, 05:16 PM #3
I'll add this to the list of Things I didn't know until the government told me:
1. Smoking is dangerous.
2. Wear a seatbelt.
3. Don't put plastic bags around children's heads.
4. How to use an extension cord without endangering myself and everyone for five blocks around me.
5. Pumping my own gasoline is dangerous when I'm in New Jersey and Oregon.
6. Eating too much fatty, salty food can be bad for my health.
-
April 16th, 2008, 06:09 PM #4
Yay! More useless information that I'll never read when in NY. From what I remember, they want to do this in San Francisco too.
I just want to know what I'm ordering and how much it costs, not how "nutritional" it may or may not be. I know damn well how many calories and sodium are in an Ultimate Cheeseburger (about 1000 calories and 1500mg sodium), but that doesn't stop me from eating it.
This law wont do a thing to "reduce obesity". People are going to eat what they want regardless of whether or not the caloric amounts are printed on the menu.Unofficial TechIMO record holder for the number of times being added and removed from beemer's ignore list.
-
April 16th, 2008, 06:15 PM #5
This is great news! I always appreciated restaurants that included nutrition information on their menu's to help me make a better choice about my meal. Sometimes it's amazing how many calories a dish has through the way its cooked. This is another piece to the puzzle in reducing obesity.
-
April 16th, 2008, 07:46 PM #6
Obstructing people from what they want to eat is about the most pathetic and socialistic bullshit I have EVER seen.
Anyone ever stop and think that It's their RIGHT if they want to be lazy and fat that they can?
LIFE
LIBERTY
PURSUIT OF HAPPINESSHe who seeks vengeance must dig two graves. One for his enemy, and one for himself.-- Lao Tzu
-
April 16th, 2008, 07:49 PM #7
Proposed law in Mississippi:
Mississippi House Bill 282 is the work of Republicans W. T. Mayhall, Jr. and John Read, and Democrat Bobby Shows. It would aim to keep Whoppers and Big Macs out of the hands of fat people, by force of law.
"Any food establishment to which this section applies shall not be allowed to serve food to any person who is obese, based on criteria prescribed by the State Department of Health after consultation with the Mississippi Council on Obesity Prevention and Management," the bill states.
Source: Consumer AffairsRobert Richmond | Infinite perceptions. One reality.
TechIMO.com Editor-in-Chief
-
April 16th, 2008, 07:57 PM #8
It's sad.
Well... Here it goes.
USA--- Has died today - April 16th 2008... It had a good run. It was born on July 4th 1776.
It was murdered by ignorant politicans,ranchers,oil tycoons, and bad laws... and hundreds of thousands of people who didn't stand up for what was right.He who seeks vengeance must dig two graves. One for his enemy, and one for himself.-- Lao Tzu
-
April 16th, 2008, 08:13 PM #9
-
April 16th, 2008, 08:17 PM #10
Why should a place that you choose to eat at make any decisions for you?
If you like something and dont care if it makes you fat... what gives them the RIGHT to deny it to a paying customer?
I understand that they are trying to curb ignorant eating habits... that's NOT societies problem... that's the individuals right to choose.
If they make said choice... expect following results.
How hard is it to understand??? JESUS!He who seeks vengeance must dig two graves. One for his enemy, and one for himself.-- Lao Tzu
-
April 16th, 2008, 08:44 PM #11
-
April 16th, 2008, 08:56 PM #12
A persons right to choose.
What in the fuck gives the govt the right to "lockout" certain foods because of your genetic dispostion?He who seeks vengeance must dig two graves. One for his enemy, and one for himself.-- Lao Tzu
-
April 16th, 2008, 10:13 PM #13Joko, can you even read? The article was about 100 words, its not like its a book. No one is making decisions for you, its giving you information to make better decisions yourself.Obstructing people from what they want to eat is about the most pathetic and socialistic bullshit I have EVER seen.
Anyone ever stop and think that It's their RIGHT if they want to be lazy and fat that they can?
-
April 16th, 2008, 10:31 PM #14
We require products in grocery stores to have it jokostel i dont see what the big deal is.
However most places now just have the food premade in bags. People dont go out to eat for the health reasons. They do it because they want someone to make them food.
-
April 16th, 2008, 10:33 PM #15
-
April 16th, 2008, 10:36 PM #16
I like knowing what's in the food I eat. I know what I'm getting when I'm at home (for the most part), but when dining out, who knows what's being served?
-
April 16th, 2008, 10:44 PM #17
-
April 16th, 2008, 10:49 PM #18
Regardless.... he is correct, Shaw.
I had heard of this BS beforehand.He who seeks vengeance must dig two graves. One for his enemy, and one for himself.-- Lao Tzu
-
April 17th, 2008, 06:15 AM #19
I disagree with the Mississippi law too. However, I find the abuses of the Bush Admin far more threatening to our American way than stopping fat people from getting burgers.
Conservatives: "If the facts disagree with our opinion, ignore the facts -- or at least misrepresent them."
-
April 17th, 2008, 07:56 AM #20
It's all the same BS.
Obsctruction of freedoms via laws put in place because "they know what's best for you".
If you look at the whole picture... it's flat out scary.
**Sadly, I think it's going to get a LOT worse before it gets better.Last edited by jokostel; April 17th, 2008 at 09:12 AM.
He who seeks vengeance must dig two graves. One for his enemy, and one for himself.-- Lao Tzu
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
9th Circuit court upholds Wash. Ten Commandments display
By mad1 in forum DebateIMO: Politics, Religion, ControversyReplies: 0Last Post: March 28th, 2008, 07:27 AM -
Appeals Court Upholds Gideons Injunction
By Beemer in forum DebateIMO: Politics, Religion, ControversyReplies: 1Last Post: August 26th, 2007, 07:26 AM -
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Gay Marriage Ban
By mad1 in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 27Last Post: July 31st, 2006, 02:39 PM -
Appeals Court Upholds FFRF's Right to Sue over Bush's Faith-based Office
By Beemer in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 4Last Post: April 3rd, 2006, 04:09 AM -
Court Upholds Do Not Call Registry!!
By Bill in SD, CA in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 4Last Post: February 17th, 2004, 06:03 PM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote





yeah its something, not sure about lulz but its something
Is It Just Me? v233893843