Why I won't vote Democrat

[sharder8]

I just picked up on this new break and realized the hypocrisy of the Democrats . . .

5 arrested in protests at GOP convention site

The Democrats fight tooth and nail about freedom of speech, yet when the Republicans legally gather for their National Convention, thousands of Liberal Democrats and anarchist show up to destroy personal and public property while trying to drown out the Republican speech.

Is this what Democrat politics comes down to? Say one thing and then do the opposite? What makes it even worse is that the Democrats will claim that the protesters had the right to attack the police and destroy public and private property and that the police were wrong in arresting them.

What a fine example of your party . . . you saw protesting at the DNC, but you didn't see the attacks on the police or the destruction of property that we're now seeing by the Democrats at the RNC.

Shameful!!!

You protect those who are illegally here, you want to reward them with benefits they have neither earned nor deserve. You destroy property and try to disrupt a legal gathering in an attempt to silence freedom of speech . . . where will it end?

Now, Beemer tells us that the Canadians are buying votes on things that interest them. Since those interests are Democrat interests and the Republicans are against said interests, that tells me that the Canadians are buying Democrat votes. And that doesn't bother you, does it????

Shame, Shame, Shame . . .

Harder

[surreal]

and many of those involved in the more violent protest were clad in black and identified themselves to reporters as anarchists.

Oh ya, the anarchist branch

[sharder8]

Originally Posted by surreal

Oh ya, the anarchist branch

Walking side by side with the Liberal and the Democrat . . . most were clad in black and claimed to be anarchist, but not all.

Didn't see them at the DNC . . . wonder why??? Are they nothing more than the violent arm of the Democrat party???

That's it Auntie, just because they claimed to be Anarchists, marching hand in hand with the Liberal/Democrats . . . . protesting the RNC . . . the Democrats aren't responsible.

If they were totally seperate and only attacked along one or two streets . . . I might see your point. But, they were right there with the Democrats and Liberals and the Democrats did nothing to seperate themselves from the destruction.

Harder

[Pexster]

Another shining example of "non-partisanship."

[pickel]

Originally Posted by sharder8

I just picked up on this new break and realized the hypocrisy of the Democrats . . .

5 arrested in protests at GOP convention site

The Democrats fight tooth and nail about freedom of speech, yet when the Republicans legally gather for their National Convention, thousands of Liberal Democrats and anarchist show up to destroy personal and public property while trying to drown out the Republican speech.

Is this what Democrat politics comes down to? Say one thing and then do the opposite? What makes it even worse is that the Democrats will claim that the protesters had the right to attack the police and destroy public and private property and that the police were wrong in arresting them.

What a fine example of your party . . . you saw protesting at the DNC, but you didn't see the attacks on the police or the destruction of property that we're now seeing by the Democrats at the RNC.

Shameful!!!

You protect those who are illegally here, you want to reward them with benefits they have neither earned nor deserve. You destroy property and try to disrupt a legal gathering in an attempt to silence freedom of speech . . . where will it end?

Now, Beemer tells us that the Canadians are buying votes on things that interest them. Since those interests are Democrat interests and the Republicans are against said interests, that tells me that the Canadians are buying Democrat votes. And that doesn't bother you, does it????

Shame, Shame, Shame . . .

Harder

First, I don't really care how you vote and particularly don't want to know...it's your vote.

Secondly , nowhere in the article was the word "Democrat" written.

Thirdly, Whatever happens to the Republicans...THEY DESERVE IT after the last eight years.

Fourth, IMO, we have NO ONE to vote for in this election who will not carry on the same irresponsible path of deceit and corruption.

Lastly, No matter how we feel, no matter what we say, It's ALL totally out of our control.

Those who TRUELY believe in this or any other government, that will put the needs and wants of the common citizenry above the special interests and corporate America, are complete fools.

[sharder8]

Originally Posted by Pexster

Another shining example of "non-partisanship."

Yeah Pex . . .

I still haven't decided who I'm going to vote for . . . . just that it won't be a Democrat.

The addition of Palin to the Repulican nomination is interesting, but I'm not too sure about that without more info on her.

Mickey's still my choice as of this moment . . .

Harder

[Pexster]

I wasn't referring to your vote. You always claim to be non-partisan, but you consistently and vehemently attack Democrats almost exclusively.

[J.Pope]

Originally Posted by sharder8

Walking side by side with the Liberal and the Democrat . . . most were clad in black and claimed to be anarchist, but not all.

Didn't see them at the DNC . . . wonder why??? Are they nothing more than the violent arm of the Democrat party???

That's it Auntie, just because they claimed to be Anarchists, marching hand in hand with the Liberal/Democrats . . . . protesting the RNC . . . the Democrats aren't responsible.

If they were totally seperate and only attacked along one or two streets . . . I might see your point. But, they were right there with the Democrats and Liberals and the Democrats did nothing to seperate themselves from the destruction.

Harder

We are all responsible, get it right.

[The Real Bingo]

Originally Posted by Pexster

I wasn't referring to your vote. You always claim to be non-partisan, but you consistently and vehemently attack Democrats almost exclusively.

Maybe it's because they suck harder than Republicans.

[sharder8]

Originally Posted by Pexster

I wasn't referring to your vote. You always claim to be non-partisan, but you consistently and vehemently attack Democrats almost exclusively.

Ya' have to realize Pex, that while I don't support the Republican Party . . . I do have strong Conservative leanings.

It just makes it easier to attack the Democrats than the Repulbicans. I do try to be even handed . . . but it's hard when you tend to agree more with one, than the other.

Harder

P.S. Don't forget . . . Mickey is far more Liberal than Conservative . . . but he isn't a Democrat!