February 15th, 2010, 11:03 PM #1
Top Taliban commander captured in Pakistan
Top Taliban commander captured in Pakistan: report - washingtonpost.com
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top military commander of the Taliban, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, has been captured in Karachi, Pakistan, in a secret raid by U.S. and Pakistani intelligence forces, The New York Times reported on Monday.
Citing U.S. government officials, the Times said Mullah Baradar, described as the most significant Taliban figure captured since the start of the Afghanistan war, had been in Pakistani custody for several days and was being interrogated by U.S. and Pakistani intelligence.
Last edited by Black*Dragon; February 15th, 2010 at 11:14 PM.Obama Lies
February 16th, 2010, 08:58 AM #2
Perhaps Cheney will now stop telling us how soft Obama is on terrorism.Conservatives: "If the facts disagree with our opinion, ignore the facts -- or at least misrepresent them."
February 16th, 2010, 09:51 AM #3
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- inside the Beltway
- Blog Entries
February 16th, 2010, 09:58 AM #4
That is one of the primary complaints we hear from our people.....the Rules of Engagement.....Someone gave Obama bad advice.Obama Lies
February 16th, 2010, 10:31 AM #5
I understand enemy combatants can shoot at our troops, hide their rifles and join the Marines in the mess hall?
It's starting to sound a lot like the air war over north Viet Nam.Obama: The rich have the Federal Reserve and the poor have Harry Reid... LOL. Life really is unfair!
February 16th, 2010, 10:31 AM #6
And I'll say it again.Obama: The rich have the Federal Reserve and the poor have Harry Reid... LOL. Life really is unfair!
February 16th, 2010, 10:46 AM #7*No night or surprise searches.
*Villagers have to be warned prior to searches.
*ANA or ANP must accompany U.S. units on searches.
*U.S. soldiers may not fire at the enemy unless the enemy is preparing to
*U.S. forces cannot engage the enemy if civilians are present.
*Only women can search women.
*Troops can fire at an insurgent if they catch him placing an IED but not if
insurgents are walking away from an area where explosives have been laid.
BTW us older folks in the service call this kind of crap....."A Johnson"
Chuckie this set of rules stinks of the liberal concept of war.
Last edited by Black*Dragon; February 16th, 2010 at 10:49 AM.Obama Lies
February 16th, 2010, 11:28 AM #8
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
Nato tightens rules of engagement to limit further civilian casualties in Aghanistan | World news | The Guardian
Losing Afghanistan, One Civilian at a Time - washingtonpost.com
Afghan Govt demands new rules of engagement - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Afghanistan: Civilian Deaths From Airstrikes | Human Rights Watch
The Real "Surge" of 2007: Non-Combatant Death in Iraq and Afghanistan
February 16th, 2010, 12:15 PM #9
Your list are sources I would not ever trust on any subject to do with this war. They have flat lied or exaggerated this story.
edit, I have to exempt the Ausie source from that, I have not read enough of their stories to say anything about them. Thought it was our ABC
Last edited by Black*Dragon; February 16th, 2010 at 12:17 PM.Obama Lies
February 16th, 2010, 12:18 PM #10
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By MTAtech in forum DebateIMO: Politics, Religion, ControversyReplies: 15Last Post: August 7th, 2009, 03:14 PM
By pickel in forum DebateIMO: Politics, Religion, ControversyReplies: 3Last Post: April 28th, 2009, 10:56 PM
By Theophylact in forum DebateIMO: Politics, Religion, ControversyReplies: 3Last Post: May 21st, 2008, 03:42 PM
By mad1 in forum DebateIMO: Politics, Religion, ControversyReplies: 1Last Post: December 23rd, 2006, 02:41 PM
By Richard Cranium in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 12Last Post: November 26th, 2001, 08:07 AM