-
August 12th, 2011, 01:34 PM #1
ObamaCare Individual Mandate Ruled Unconstitutional by 11th. Circuit Court
Just breaking.
U.S. Appeals Court Rules Against Obama's Health Care Law
*****
The final legacy of the United States will be that in the end liberalism shamed & destroyed the heritage of this great nation. How sad as I see no turning back. When in Rome ..
-
August 12th, 2011, 01:49 PM #2
How about some links that actually contains info? One sentence from Fox news is lame when a quick google returns multiple references that actually contain, you know, full articles.
Health-Law Mandate Ruled Unconstitutional by Appeals Court - WSJ.com
11th Circuit says individual mandate is unconstitutional | Kyle Wingfield
Interesting, but not really a major story as we know that this issue is already headed for SCOTUS and that this will just get rolled in with the other lawsuits.
Oh, and to appear even-handed with your trite titles, would you please refer to the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as the Bush Genocide?Good job, friend-of-friends!
-
August 12th, 2011, 02:41 PM #3
Sorry to have ruined your day. I did precede the link with: Just breaking.
At the time I could find no other links.
However, ..... if you look now, you will find that those few words have had babies hopefully for your delight.
As far as your "trite titles" comment is concerned, I think your "trite comment" speaks for itself.
Bill*****
The final legacy of the United States will be that in the end liberalism shamed & destroyed the heritage of this great nation. How sad as I see no turning back. When in Rome ..
-
August 12th, 2011, 02:45 PM #4
So, the good risks don't have to get insurance but the insurance companies can't refuse bad risks. Public option here we come.
Conservatives: "If the facts disagree with our opinion, ignore the facts -- or at least misrepresent them."
-
August 12th, 2011, 06:20 PM #5
Notes:
(1) The decision was split 2-1; appeal to the full Court is probable. The dissent was blistering.
(2) The 11th Circuit is considered to be exceptionally conservative on the whole; it covers Alabama, Florida and Georgia.
(3) The decision was that the mandate provision was severable, so the rest of the law stands. As MTAtech says, without the mandate the insurance companies will go broke. You better believe there's a fix in store. Public option, or Medicare-for-all.In judging a two-person singing contest, never award the prize to the second soprano having heard only the first.
-- Francis Bator
-
August 13th, 2011, 02:34 PM #6
Here is the question in a nutshell:
Can any of you answer it?The essential question is: if courts uphold the individual mandate, what is the constitutional principle that would limit the U.S. Congress’s exercise of its Commerce Clause power?Obama: The rich have the Federal Reserve and the poor have Harry Reid... LOL. Life really is unfair!
-
August 13th, 2011, 02:59 PM #7
For one, not everything is commerce.
The individual mandate could have been achieved by Congress' taxing power -- impose a tax that is credited if one already has insurance.Conservatives: "If the facts disagree with our opinion, ignore the facts -- or at least misrepresent them."
-
August 13th, 2011, 03:00 PM #8
Well, the Court has already answered that in US v. Lopez, which invalidated the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990:
But while carrying handguns may not relate to commercial enterprise, health insurance -- a major burden on companies -- clearly does.In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals. It held that while Congress had broad lawmaking authority under the Commerce Clause, the power was limited, and did not extend so far from "commerce" as to authorize the regulation of the carrying of handguns, especially when there was no evidence that carrying them affected the economy on a massive scale.
Chief Justice Rehnquist, delivering the opinion of the Court, identified the three broad categories of activity that Congress could regulate under the Commerce Clause:- the channels of interstate commerce,
- the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, or persons or things in interstate commerce, and
- activities that substantially affect or substantially relate to interstate commerce
The opinion rejected the government's argument that because crime negatively impacted education Congress might have reasonably concluded that crime in schools substantially affects commerce.
The Court reasoned that if Congress could regulate something so far removed from commerce, then it could regulate anything, and since the Constitution clearly creates Congress as a body with enumerated powers, this could not be so.In judging a two-person singing contest, never award the prize to the second soprano having heard only the first.
-- Francis Bator
-
August 13th, 2011, 06:12 PM #9
None of those things are in the bill...
Obmacare, like Obama, is DOA...
Obama: Debt man walking!
Obama: The rich have the Federal Reserve and the poor have Harry Reid... LOL. Life really is unfair!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
11th Circuit Court Frees Former Gov. Don Siegelman
By Theophylact in forum DebateIMO: Politics, Religion, ControversyReplies: 0Last Post: March 28th, 2008, 10:25 AM -
Gay marriages ruled unconstitutional in MA
By fatal xception in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 3Last Post: November 18th, 2003, 08:57 PM -
Ten commandments ruled unconstitutional?
By caddmannq in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 125Last Post: November 27th, 2002, 12:05 PM -
Pledge of Allegiance ruled unconstitutional
By Solid Snake in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 91Last Post: June 28th, 2002, 04:14 PM -
Childrens Internet Protection Act Ruled Unconstitutional.
By MegalosSkylaki in forum General Tech DiscussionReplies: 16Last Post: June 2nd, 2002, 02:56 AM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote



It would make for a terrible weapon for the average mass murderer. A more appropriate gift would the The Anarchist Cookbook.
The perfect gift for an aspiring...