-
April 24th, 2012, 07:52 PM #1
TSA insists 4-yo is helping hide weapons.
4-Year-Old Gets TSA Pat-Down Following Hug From Grandma - The Consumerist
I have got to ask you guys, how REASONABLE is it to believe that a 4 year old wearingThis is when the 4-year-old ran over to give grandma a hug:
They made very brief contact, no longer than a few seconds. The Transportation Security Officers(TSO) who were present responded to this very simple action in the worst way imaginable.
First, a TSO began yelling at my child, and demanded she too must sit down and await a full body pat-down. I was prevented from coming any closer, explaining the situation to her, or consoling her in any way. My daughter, who was dressed in tight leggings, a short sleeve shirt and mary jane shoes, had no pockets, no jacket and nothing in her hands. The TSO refused to let my daughter pass through the scanners once more, to see if she too would set off the alarm. It was implied, several times, that my Mother, in their brief two-second embrace, had passed a handgun to my daughter.to be carrying some kind of weapon? Not to mention asking "Would a 4 year old girl understand what is going on well enough to be able to actually hide a weapon from the TSA?"dressed in tight leggings, a short sleeve shirt and mary jane shoes, had no pockets, no jacket and nothing in her hands.They say technology slows down for no one. I know it outruns my wallet. I figure its because my wallet isn't light enough yet.
TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!
dulce bellum inexpertis
-
April 24th, 2012, 09:08 PM #2
Grandma should have gone with the plastic shiv.
-
April 24th, 2012, 11:50 PM #3http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iE9TN...eature=related
The Nation which forgets it's defenders will itself be forgotten
You cannot make peace with dictators. You have to destroy them–wipe them out!
-
April 25th, 2012, 12:37 PM #4
It is completely unreasonable and entirely unnecessary. Consider this: Israel runs the most secure, risk-free airlines on the planet. At their security checkpoints, you don't even have to remove your shoes.
Our draconian methods are meritless, are burdensome, and show a complete lack of logic. It is a phenomenal waste of tax-payer money that has a zero ROI.Good job, friend-of-friends!
-
April 25th, 2012, 01:32 PM #5
-
April 25th, 2012, 01:39 PM #6
Race is unfortunately probably something they factor in. But since its based on a face to face interview, it's more about proper police tactics that insure 95-97% of passengers face minimal interference. Contrast that to our US system where everyone undergoes intense screening and many passengers end up dealing with unnecessary intrusions.
Ultimately, I guess it depends on how we as a nation would rather approach it. We can either have everyone share the misery of nude scans and full-body searches in our bare feet, or we can utilize an intelligent system that insures only few will go through the intrusive process.Good job, friend-of-friends!
-
April 25th, 2012, 03:26 PM #7
But when you say "Race unfortunately" you already are taking away part of the israels tools away. how does one end up in the face to face interview with "proper police" random spot checks?
-
April 25th, 2012, 03:37 PM #8
It's "unfortunate" because racial profiling is so easily abused. I don't intend to take away part of that tool set. I'm merely commenting on the need for proper checks and balances to keep the profiling from running amok.
It seems you don't understand the procedures the Israelis utilize. Everyone goes through the face to face interview and then is sent to one of two clearing zones. If you pass the interview, it's just the old school metal detector and luggage scan. If you don't pass, you go through another interview process and more thorough set of scans that can include your luggage being hand searched and your electronics messed with.Good job, friend-of-friends!
-
April 25th, 2012, 04:54 PM #9
-
April 26th, 2012, 09:32 AM #10In judging a two-person singing contest, never award the prize to the second soprano having heard only the first.
-- Francis Bator
-
April 26th, 2012, 12:09 PM #11
The take-away here from both vern's and Theo's links is that the TSA issued statements in both cases defending the screeners as having acted properly in line with regulations. The deeper problem that needs immediate addressing is how poorly run the TSA is. The is a top-down problem. Leadership has created an abysmal structure that enourages the abuse of others, and as such, attracts the abusive as employees.
EDIT: IMO, if someone misses a flight due to TSA procedures, the government should reimburse them for their losses, including food, hotel if needed, and tickets for the next convienent flight.Last edited by tony_j15; April 26th, 2012 at 12:12 PM.
Good job, friend-of-friends!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
TSA Shuts Door on Private Airport Screening Program That Exposed TSA’s Inefficiency
By pickel in forum DebateIMO: Politics, Religion, ControversyReplies: 0Last Post: January 30th, 2011, 12:46 PM -
Why NOT let TSA grab your junk? Do you have something to hide?
By no1_vern in forum DebateIMO: Politics, Religion, ControversyReplies: 50Last Post: December 24th, 2010, 10:10 PM -
Man Insists on DNA Test, Found Innocent, Then Arrested
By RobRich in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 15Last Post: August 28th, 2006, 10:53 AM -
Ra-Tsa-Tsa
By BadRuski in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 4Last Post: April 26th, 2006, 08:46 AM -
U.S. insists on controlling Web
By pickel in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 8Last Post: October 1st, 2005, 04:58 PM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote




Ignore teh big commentary pic in the center, check out the llama pic off to the right.
Is It Just Me? v233893843