+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
February 17th, 2017, 01:31 PM #1
Bill Gates: the robot that takes your job should pay taxes
The struggle between the rich and the poor as automation sacrifices more jobs and the rich take more and more of the pie.THE DONALD FOR AMERICA
February 17th, 2017, 03:16 PM #2
If the "Robots" get taxed, don't you think that the companies that employ their use, will inflate the cost of acquisition ,maintenance and electric power to run them ????
Their CPA's are, I'm sure, way ahead of the game.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOtab0BKOGY
The Nation which forgets it's defenders will itself be forgotten
You cannot make peace with dictators. You have to destroy them–wipe them out!
February 17th, 2017, 06:12 PM #3
Taxes can be passed on according to how elastic the demand for the product is--the more elastic , the less it's passed on to the customer.
Karl Marx foresaw the problem of cost saving devices and their own cost: if a device saved the capitalist 10,000 thousands pounds, than the market would bid up its price to, well, 10,000 thousand pounds. So why would the capitalist install one in the first place? Because some other company might and gain an advantage.
The American railroads had the ability to install the new air breaks which would have allowed them to create trains of more than 5 carriages as the manual brakes required a brakeman to dangerously run from car to car while the air breaks allowed some dozen cars more safely trained. Yet the railroads were reluctant to install them into the Railway Act forced this profit making (!) device upon them--showing that not even profit makes people reasonable.
What a "robot" even is may not resemble a humanoid. Imagine nano robots or what we already have in car manufacturers. The term comes from a play I believe R.U.R. --Rossum's Universal Robots (R.U.R.) by Karol Capek and the word comes from serfdom and the duty to perform labour for the master called the "robot"..
Hmmm....there is a heart (and other) surgery device that looks like a giant crab called a di Vinci machine where the surgeon sits at a computer. Tax the di Vinci machine, eh? I think NM taxes medicines...surgery?? Nah !
Polymathic Leisure DooG !
February 19th, 2017, 01:23 AM #4
Even robots and newer automated technologies need someone to maintain and improve them. Technology moves on and if you choose not to, it's your choice. Heck, if one wanted advancement to stand still back in the day. I'd be traveling in a horse and buggy. Technological advances requires a whole bunch of a capable workforce to institute it.
The problem the Left faces is technology exempts a huge portion of their voter base. Hence, they have to offset certain advancements which could potentially impact their political power.Mojo
I don't always exercise, but when I do it's my Constitutional right to bear arms.
February 20th, 2017, 03:15 PM #5
I reckon this fear has been around since the industrial revolution and has, time and again, proven to be misplaced.
February 20th, 2017, 03:21 PM #6
February 20th, 2017, 03:34 PM #7
February 20th, 2017, 04:43 PM #8
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Joplin, MO
- Blog Entries
February 20th, 2017, 05:18 PM #9
So advancements in automation and machinery that take humans away from certain professions is less desirable than keeping them in dangerous/laborious jobs? Would the human condition be as bright as it is today if this type of attitude had prevailed over history?
February 20th, 2017, 05:18 PM #10THE DONALD FOR AMERICA
February 20th, 2017, 05:23 PM #11
Luddites (early 19th century) As the Industrial Revolution accelerated in the early 19th century, many skilled textile workers were replaced by unskilled laborers who could use newly invented machines. The most vocal opponents of textile mechanization were known as Luddites, a term said to have derived from the surname of a youth named Ned Ludd who broke two stocking frames in 1779. Between 1811 and 1813, organized groups of Luddites clashed with the British military at mills in Nottinghamshire and Yorkshire. In response, Parliament passed the Frame Breaking Act, which made industrial sabotage a capital crime.
While the Luddites were suppressed relatively quickly, the perpetrators of the Swing Riots in Kent in 1830 employed similar tactics by demolishing threshing machines to protest the mechanization of agriculture. Today, the term “Luddite” refers more generally to anybody who is uncomfortable with technology.
Without the rationalization of agriculture, the Industrial Revolution might never have taken place because it "freed" the cheap labour necessary for industrialization. In its early days, the machines had to be themselves labouriously hand-produced and the capital-intensiveness of industrialization required economies elsewhere--as in very cheap and abundant labour. It was only later that machines could be used to make machines
The rationalization of agriculture had two features, food could be grown with less people by various inventions, even a yoke which did not cut off the larynx and fallowing techniques as well as legal changes for the conveyancing of land. The American "fee simple" method where you own the land from the center of the earth to the top of the sky was foreign to Europe where what was held was the limited right to use the land which ultimately was derived from the local or distant sovereign.
The other was the abolition of "robot", the duty of service to the local aristocrat and giving allowance to relocate. The newly "freed" labor found itself unemployed and would to work for subsistence wages. ("Will work for food" ) and the need for all family members to work to subsist, starting from about age 4 or 5 years.
For some reason the Luddites are often confused--as least in nomenclature with an earlier group called the Lollards and I seen references to "modern-day Lollardism"** in this regard. Maybe they sound alike, an acoustic rather than semantic confusion.
**He and the Lollards also challenged the privileged status of the clergy, calling at various times for a lay clergy, an end to clerical celibacy, the end of confession to priests, and a ban on priests holding temporal offices. The Lollards were driven underground....[Edit]Wycliffe was posthumously declared a heretic at the 1415 Council of Constance, after which his corpse was exhumed and posthumously beheaded
February 20th, 2017, 05:24 PM #12
February 20th, 2017, 05:31 PM #13
Shouldn't the elimination of jobs be something that the human race strives for? We develop the technology so that we don't have to work and can do fun things only.THE DONALD FOR AMERICA
February 20th, 2017, 05:37 PM #14
February 20th, 2017, 05:38 PM #15
Well you best wrap your head around it soon before a robot replaces you. Maybe you'll get lucky and the robot that replaces you will be one that needs an "operator". Until A.I. replaces the operator.
Fun times!THE DONALD FOR AMERICA
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By no1_vern in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 9Last Post: April 3rd, 2010, 10:12 PM
By vikeor in forum General Tech DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: June 16th, 2006, 11:25 AM
By AJAJAJ in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 12Last Post: January 18th, 2005, 12:08 AM
By Jokerswild in forum General Tech DiscussionReplies: 20Last Post: September 30th, 2004, 10:24 AM
By Joe Desa in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 21Last Post: May 11th, 2003, 11:56 AM