Genome@home project is merging with the Folding@home team  | | |
May 22nd, 2002, 10:33 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,810
| Genome@home project is merging with the Folding@home team
Well folk looks like the combined client is gonna be here very shortly, beta versions available
For the Folding team it is not going to be much of a difference but for the Genome team it's gonna mean that we have to make some choices. GAH 3 is a new project. Like FAH 2 was. We might have a chance of getting higher on this new project and staying there but this is going to be the biggest problem with the new client I think. Quote:
Can I nonet/sneakernet with Folding@home3.0?
No, not in the same way as the G@h0.99 client. This is one of the reasons that we're continuing with Genome@home Classic, for all the hardcore nonetters out there!
| The current client will still run 'for the forseeable future' and will keep it's current stats page.
We will have to decide as a team whether we will move to the new project or stick with the old. My problem is that I will need to change my machines before the end of june.
Well any ideas?
Griobhta
ps here is the FAQ at GAH |
| |
May 22nd, 2002, 12:59 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Regina, Sask, Canada
Posts: 1,635
|
I say we do both. Whoever can't switch or need a reliable client, should keep working on the old GAH.
__________________
GAH, ECCP, Folding, and RC5 |
| |
May 22nd, 2002, 04:42 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 967
|
Hmmm, I have been reading the yahoo genome group and I have mixed emotions! I'm sure of this......the Pande group doesn't quite know what they are going to do! They are having a meeting on Monday to make some decisions!
I, right at this moment, am going to stick with the old client til the end of June!
GilaM |
| |
May 22nd, 2002, 05:37 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Regina, Sask, Canada
Posts: 1,635
|
I've looked into it a bit more. The clients expire on June 4th. And I have not figured out how to have them work on Genome units. There was mention of a 'Core_c6.exe' which is what you should see if the client is working on Genome. All I get is 'Core_65.exe' which is the folding core.
Looks like it is a wait and see.
BTW, anyone that is working on folding and doesn't have a problem with the new client's expire date. I would recommend getting the new client. It is suppose to be much faster. |
| |
May 22nd, 2002, 05:56 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,810
|
Just downloaded it there virus and running it on this machine to see how it goes. There is also the prob that recent versions of Folding 2 seem to have problems running as a service with firedaemon.
Griobhta |
| |
May 22nd, 2002, 05:58 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Space for Sale! :p
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: La Isla del Encanto
Posts: 5,836
|
Well, I'm staying with the old client (for the nonetting thingie) as of now.!
I think that maybe they'll put this option on the newest client knowing that a lot of people don't have 24/7 net access!
__________________
boo!
|
| |
May 22nd, 2002, 07:08 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Regina, Sask, Canada
Posts: 1,635
|
Are you using the console client or the fancy pants windowed client?
The windowed client doesn't play friendly with my computer. |
| |
May 22nd, 2002, 07:13 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,810
|
I've always found the FAH window client doesn't display that well on my machine. I just run it and keep it minimised.
Suppose I should try and run the console version.
Griobhta |
| |
May 23rd, 2002, 06:18 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | F@H Cheerleader
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Springfield guess?
Posts: 9,250
|
whatever we do, it should be together.
__________________
Why do I run F@H ? Because its one way I might actually make a difference in somebody's life. http://folding.stanford.edu/ |
| |
May 23rd, 2002, 07:06 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | dword to your moms
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: ~/
Posts: 3,195
|
I'm with Nunya there.....we should migrate it as a team if we go. Although the no nonet for the new client is not very handy. I am only running part tiem on m machine, and the 1.4 is now a nonet machine, losing a lot of CPU power if we cant nonet. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |