[F@H SPAM 28 JUN 09] Today's the day...

[Aaron_8015]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flying JJ

Yes I probably would. But if they come out with the new hydro copper 300's I shouldn't need to. I want to try to get the tri-275 temps. down.

Just so you know I am trying to restrain myself until the 300's come out on a very good reccomendation.

And as soon as you do I will be straight round to 'oogle' at em. Then bench em.

[KarmaKiller]

To bend he's sending them to me first! Muhahahahahah

at least that's what I hope!


I just read some about the new cores. TMSC already has them in production, but it seems as the yields aren't so good. So basically means they are gonna be more expensive yet then what some where thinking.
(in the article they said that they were getting 30%-40% yields, which is pretty bad in all honesty.)

[Sky King]

Say, every time I reboot, my linux SMP WUs are getting the kibash now.

[13:52:31] Loaded queue successfully.
[13:52:31] Unit 9's deadline (June 22 15:07) has passed.
[13:52:31] - Preparing to get new work unit...

I can see that the deadline for the unit is actually something like 7/1, and that my computer clock is set right. This has happened several times and each time the faux deadline that the folder thinks I have violated is always 6/22.

WUs complete just fine and get sent if I complete them straight through, but if I restart the folder for any reason, it rejects the existing WU as being expired and grabs a new one.

Thoughts?

These are on Reilly's linux folding Virtual Appliances which are usually rock solid.

[Networker4321]

Congratulations to the Newd Lewd Man for topping Vern,,,again. Now I have a question about my folding efforts. ( Can't really say I like the way they are refreshing the data every 24 hours now? )

I added three(3) new workstations yesterday in an effort to boost my production. Was planning on adding two more machines today.

My question is simple. Shouldn't the team and user data page reflect accurate processor counts? All of the new assignments were large so none have finished yet. Could that affect count of active processors?

Folding for the cause!

[KarmaKiller]

Hmm. that's akward for sure.
My thoughts would be stanfords still got a borked server. I've had some problems earlier this week, and it still seems like the stat updates are off to me. My FAHmon puts me at 16-20k a day, all the stats show is 12k!
That would be my guess, but I've honestly never tried Reilly's app, so IDK.

[KarmaKiller]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Networker4321

Congratulations to the Newd Lewd Man for topping Vern,,,again. Now I have a question about my folding efforts. ( Can't really say I like the way they are refreshing the data every 24 hours now? )

I added three(3) new workstations yesterday in an effort to boost my production. Was planning on adding two more machines today.

My question is simple. Shouldn't the team and user data page reflect accurate processor counts? All of the new assignments were large so none have finished yet. Could that affect count of active processors?

Folding for the cause!

yes, depending on which stat/update page you go buy, the numbers of CPU's will show different.
In my experience, it's not always right, more of something to get a general idea of how many, but nothing I'd bet on for sure.
Nice to see ya around Net, haven't seen ya for awhile it seems like.
(that or you've been hiding in DumbIMO..err... DebateIMO section)

[Flying JJ]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aaron_8015

And as soon as you do I will be straight round to 'oogle' at em. Then bench em.

You just have to get your butt back over here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KarmaKiller

To bend he's sending them to me first! Muhahahahahah

at least that's what I hope!


I just read some about the new cores. TMSC already has them in production, but it seems as the yields aren't so good. So basically means they are gonna be more expensive yet then what some where thinking.
(in the article they said that they were getting 30%-40% yields, which is pretty bad in all honesty.)

[Networker4321]

Thanks Karma, I think I got out of debate hell,,,,finally. Been spending time helping Newbs fix simple issues. Adding more toyz to my network.

Work is VERY busy with new projects at HCA Healthcare. Get this, adding enough frames to hold 114 1GB drives, thousands of tape slots.

Adding more worstations tonight so I can fold like a Mad Man!! I would like for the stats to be correct but as long as work is getting done and I keep getting new assignments I have to go eith the flow,,,,

[Nude_Lewd_Man]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flying JJ

Don't know if it's the closest to you but either phl or ABE is to me.
Cheap Flights to Philadelphia Intl (PHL) from Springfield


and how do I get the text in a link to be other than the link? It doesn't work the way I do it in other forums.

I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to ask...

If you mean that it doesn't display something like http://www.site_address.whatever/page_name, but whatever the name of that page is, then it depends on the hosting site.

If you mean that you want to specify what to call it, then you can type the text you want to call it, highlight the part you want to use as the link and click the "Insert Link" in the bar of buttons above the response box (or, in IE, press <Ctrl>+<K>) and put the address you want to use in the pop-up box that will appear....

[Flying JJ]

Thanks Nude, in the other forum I used http tags and inside them " " around what I wanted the link to say.

Here from what I am understanding it is like below. Hope it works.

Here is test link to the Egg.

Edit: yep it works, THANKS NUDE!