October 28th, 2002, 08:58 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SoCal.
Posts: 2,844
|
maybe it will work for me... 
__________________
FalcomPSX
| 
|  | |
October 28th, 2002, 09:25 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,211
|
Ready, set, let's GGOO! 
__________________
McCain makes me feel like a Jew in Nazi Germany.
| |
| | |
October 29th, 2002, 12:57 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Lincoln City, OR
Posts: 204
|
For all you curious people, you can read some interesting info over here: http://www.ecompute.org/ecc2/
Might want to bookmark this, it's the official site.
| |
| | |
October 29th, 2002, 01:26 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Go back to sleep
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Switzerland
Posts: 5,816
|
__________________
Knowledge Is Power
| |
| | |
November 8th, 2002, 11:36 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Iowa
Posts: 720
|
Added Benchmarks for the pre-release client.
Benchmarks of the pre-release client based on data gathered at the ECC2 and TechIMO forums.
Athlon .5114 ips/mhz
P2/P3/Celeron .4540 ips/mhz
P4 .2145 ips/mhz
viz
__________________
Free DMcOwen674! [l]http://www.tacube.com/pages/mcowen.html[/l]
| |
| | |
November 9th, 2002, 05:09 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Moved to Germany
Posts: 2,397
| Quote: Originally posted by viztech
Athlon .5114 ips/mhz | I don't know why it runs so bad on my AMD 1400? Although speed has slightly increase since the start, its still 690/700 
My 700Mhz is performing 360 so that is normal according to the calculation. | |
| | |
November 9th, 2002, 09:34 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Iowa
Posts: 720
|
Dutch-
2 of the 1400s in the sample were running Win XP. They were 685 and 710 ips, so if you're running Win XP you are right in there. 
As for Athlon XP CPUs, they are 'over-rated' as far as mhz.
My XP1700 runs at a stock speed of 1466mhz. The benchmarks are for actual mhz. 
viz | |
| | |
November 9th, 2002, 09:46 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Moved to Germany
Posts: 2,397
| Quote: Originally posted by viztech
Dutch-
2 of the 1400s in the sample were running Win XP. They were 685 and 710 ips, so if you're running Win XP you are right in there. | Yes winXP, glad to see this is kinda normal. I could test it under win98 since I have a dual boot. But I want to press it over 700 under winXP. I shall check which process is taking up the rest. Otherwise I have to live with it.
Can't test it right now since I got a big download running from my friends PC so I can't restart or test anything about that at the moment. | |
| | |
November 9th, 2002, 01:46 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Orange,CA
Posts: 783
|
hey dutch-
at least it isn't a p4 that is running in the 500's | |
| | |
November 9th, 2002, 01:51 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Indispensable Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Meechigan
Posts: 12,511
|
I have a 1200 Tbird doing about 687 to 720.. | 
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | 
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | |   Most Active Discussions  | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | 
|
hardware
prices 
![[ECC2-109] Info Thread](http://www.techimo.com/forum/iconimages/distributed-computing/ecc2-109-info-thread_ltr.gif){kind=small}
