Thread: What happened to Cyrix?
-
March 6th, 2004, 04:29 PM #1
What happened to Cyrix?

Anyone know what happened to cyrix? Did the company tank?
I remember seeing a article in a magazine in 1998 about the owner (in texas where the plant is/was located) who was planning a chip called cayenne. Did this even come out? The article was in a magazine called Boot, now called Maximum pc.
DaneLast edited by nochay; March 6th, 2004 at 04:33 PM.
Back Online! http://rhd.dyndns.org <-- The History Site (Admin)
http://www.vegasfreecyclers.com/forum/index.php <---Moderator
-
March 6th, 2004, 04:39 PM #2Not Really a Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 27,856
I believe VIA bought them out.. think they started making some cheap chips based on Cyrix.
Not sure about the status now.Helicopters don't fly; they vibrate so much and make so much noise that the earth rejects them.
-
March 6th, 2004, 04:41 PM #3
they make the miniitx formfactor now with integrated fanless cpus
Hey who turned sigs on?
-
March 6th, 2004, 05:04 PM #4Ultimate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Augsburg, Germany
- Posts
- 5,584
Cyrix got absorbed into National Semiconductors. They sold the CPU business off to VIA very soon after, while they kept the integrated-CPU branch until very recently, when it got sold off to AMD.
VIA in turn acquired Cyrix CPU business about at the same time as they bought the WinChip team off IDT. Cyrix's then hottest chip, the M-III, made it into sample state, but then was dropped in favour of the WinChip architecture for various reasons - Cyrix engineers leaving by the dozen, problems making the M-III at useful speed grades, these things. Meanwhile, the WinChip had successfully been migrated from socket-7 to socket-370, still a small die, cheap to manufacture at good yield, albeit with much worse per-clock performance than any other CPU.
So the "Cyrix III" that actually made it onto retail shelves wasn't a Cyrix at all, it was a WinChip. The latter line has been continued to today's VIA processors, while the Cyrix legacy is gone, all that remains being a shedload of patents and brilliant ideas. VIA since emphasize on the WinChip's strength - small die size, low power consumption.
-
March 6th, 2004, 05:18 PM #5
In the early days Cyrix chips and IBM chips were the same thing. Cyrix got a bad rep years ago. Performance wise they were not as good as Intel or AMD but you could buy them for 1/2 the cost of Intel chips. I had dealers tell me that Cyrix chips wouldn't run Windows and other programs too. I used many of them and never had a problem.
“Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
Benjamin Franklin
-
March 6th, 2004, 05:44 PM #6
I really liked the (older) Cyrix cpu as it allowed me to play within it's architecture to evaluate the best performance gain by allowing me to configure it's commands.
With the few programs I could locate online.
-
March 6th, 2004, 06:40 PM #7Ultimate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 1,429
I got a couple Cyrix 486 chips back at home. Still up and running.
-
March 6th, 2004, 09:05 PM #8
I had a cyrix 233 mmx for a long time because it's what I can afford then. At 187 mhz its PR is 233 (sounds familiar?)

Later I replaced it with an intel 233 mmx and it was faster. I would rate the cyrix PR200 as it'll match intel 200 if not faster. Interesting thing is cyrix has 64k L1 cache while intel had 32k L1 cache. The L2 caches are on mobos. Remember the old sockets 7s and that they take amd, intel, and cyrix cpus?
\o/ Billy
-
March 6th, 2004, 09:45 PM #9
I had heard that people hated the cyrix processors, as some of them are plagued with crappy math calculation, and lackluster speed. It's been a long time since I heard something about the company, and it's pretty cool that you guys filled me in
Thanks!
DaneBack Online! http://rhd.dyndns.org <-- The History Site (Admin)
http://www.vegasfreecyclers.com/forum/index.php <---Moderator
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks






Reply With Quote

I prefer not to be stopped in the street just because someone decided my clothes were "wrong" or my hair was "too long". I do understand and partly agree with your point, but this was too much, IMO.
Do you think this was a legitimate...