home hardware prices news articles forums photos user reviews
Go Back   Tech Support Forums - TechIMO.com > PC Hardware and Tech > General Tech Discussion
Ask a Tech Support Question (free)!

Too much RAM makes computer run slower?

Reply
Get bargains at  »  Dealighted.com
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Currently Active Users: 2663
Discussions: 200,520, Posts: 2,374,496, Members: 245,842
Old May 6th, 2004, 03:37 PM   Digg it!   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ablang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 926
Send a message via AIM to ablang
Too much RAM makes computer run slower?

I seem to remember reading that if someone is using anything other than NT, 2000, or XP, that their computer runs slower if more than 512MB RAM is installed.

Is this true?
ablang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2004, 03:41 PM     #2 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
HeadBand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,991
i havn't heard slower but i have heard that it will have problems (never tried it though) i think there might be some patch though
HeadBand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2004, 03:59 PM     #3 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
osprey4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 8,678
Normally, neither Windows 98 nor ME will run on more than 512 MB of RAM. However, I've seen a registry tweak you can use to trick the system into believing there is only 512 MB, even if you have more.
osprey4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2004, 07:05 PM     #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
StealthyV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 808
on older systems too, you have to update the BIOS to recognize sticks with more than 256mb...my Mini-ITX puter doesn't currently recognize my 512mb stick, and thinks it's 256. I have to update the bios (using a floppy drive, and hmm...no fdd connector on my mobo...gonna have to sacrifice a cd-r disc) before I am able to use all 512mb sd-ram.

oh, and I'm currently running Win98 too. it sucks...I can't find my win2k pro cd, so I have to use either win95 (noo!!!) or win98SE until I do.

~Branson
StealthyV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2004, 07:26 PM     #5 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
DoctorReno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,259
The problem with "too much" memory in any of the 9x OS's is that the virtual cache settings will be incorrect above 512MB RAM. You can easily correct these settings and the 9x OS's will run higher amounts just fine.
The directions to make the changes can be posted if you want.
DoctorReno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2004, 07:36 PM     #6 (permalink)
It's full of stars ¬_¬;
 
paul9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gateshead U.K.
Posts: 9,159
Send a message via MSN to paul9 Send a message via Yahoo to paul9
Quote:
Originally Posted by osprey4
Normally, neither Windows 98 nor ME will run on more than 512 MB of RAM. However, I've seen a registry tweak you can use to trick the system into believing there is only 512 MB, even if you have more.

768 mb on windows me and it runs ok. works ok on 98se as well, no registry tweaking, i do usually set a fixed swapfile size, but haven't this time since i put an 80gb maxtor drive in.
paul9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2004, 07:56 PM     #7 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
DoctorReno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,259
I'm pretty certain the issue is not a reg tweak but rather the virtual cache tweaks I mentioned above.
StealthyV: there are a couple of reasons that your system does not recognize the 512Mb module: 1) Your mother board was not designed to recognize anything bigger than 256MB per memory slot. 2) Ther is an issue of density on the memory module, in other words how many chips are on the module to achieve the quantity of RAM. Newer menory modules can have as few as 2 chips versus older modules that needed say 16 chips to get the value. It's kinda lengthy to explain but older systems can't recognize all of the memory available from a module if the density is to high.

You may be correct that this is a BIOS issue but that will be a new on on me. If you want post your MoBo model and also the 512 modules model # and it should be a quick thing to figure out why only 256 is recognized.
DoctorReno is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Most Active Discussions
Is It Just Me? (1660)
FT HOOD attack: 7 killed 12 injured (70)
HELP!!! What do you think of this s.. (25)
windows 7 retail and rtm (5)
Review My Build (6)
Looking for a graphic card that wil.. (30)
My 1st pc build (40)
PC Modern Warfare 2: it's much wors.. (12)
core i7 extreme 975, nvidia 9400gt (9)
Building my first computer (13)
Aero in Vista (7)
[F@H SPAM 11/1/09]New month . . . n.. (34)
Internet very slow since updating A.. (10)
slaving laptop drive (7)
Recent Discussions
[F@H SPAM 11/08/09] Where has all the.. (1)
nvidia geforce 9500GT 1gig DDR2 (3)
[F@H SPAM 11/1/09]New month . . . new.. (34)
Endless BSOD to Recovery Manager loop.. (0)
HELP!!! What do you think of this sys.. (25)
New Processor, Monitor will not turn .. (3)
Determining ip route and serial addre.. (8)
can u beat freecell # 1941? (11)
Dell 8300 Graphics Problems (1)
I have words with double underlines a.. (2)
Internet very slow since updating AVG.. (10)
My Pc wont start after i interupted D.. (0)
windows 7 retail and rtm (5)
New processor technical problem (0)
boot from CD-ROM in chipset via P4M80.. (2)
Powe Director v8 (0)
Windows Experience Index is screwed u.. (3)
Review My Build (6)
FAT32 to NTFS file system in Win2kpro (4)
Motherboards and my curse... (25)
2009 Build (4)
My 1st pc build (40)
Freezing During Music/Movies (1)
ext. sound card laptop to stereo syst.. (2)
Remote Desktop via SSH and error mess.. (2)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 PM.
TechIMO Copyright 2008 All Enthusiast, Inc.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28