May 14th, 2008, 05:18 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | 分かりますか。
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Gville, FL
Posts: 7,132
|
You are going to need an OS system as well.
32-bit OS's only support 3GB of ram. |
| |
May 14th, 2008, 05:27 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,229
|
4GB actually, but not all of it shows up. If you're going with 4GB total, it doesn't matter which you go with. A 32bit system will probably only allow you to use 3.25-3.5GB out of the 4 where as a 64bit will let you use all of it. However, 64bit OS, Vista in particualar uses more memory to begin with so it ends up being virutally the same.
__________________
"Opinions not based on knowledge are ugly things"
|
| |
May 14th, 2008, 05:34 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 95
| Quote:
Originally Posted by RamonGTP Intel chipsets are a better option than the nVidia ones are. Really, the only reason to go nVidia is if you will go SLI on the video cards, beucase Intel does not currently support SLI. The breakdown goes like this.
SLI: nVidia chipset (not sure as to the model numbers)
Crossfire: Intel X38
Single card: Intel P35 | So I shouldn't have too many problems running a SINGLE 9800GTX on a X38 chipset then?
I am still looking through Intel MB's that I like and so far this is one that has my attention. ASUS P5E LGA 775 Intel X38 GIGABYTE GA-EP35C-DS3R
Looks nice too, but gonna have to get a add-on card for firewire support.
Still looking though.
And I have vista 64, just can't run it on my current puter, no driver support for this board.
Last edited by crzystng : May 14th, 2008 at 05:37 PM.
|
| |
May 14th, 2008, 05:45 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,229
|
Yes, both those would work, but like I said before, might want to stick with P35 and save some money. The advantage of x38 is crossfire support, which you will not be using. Of course, there is no down side to using x38, it'll work just fine, you're just not using the features that you're paying extra for.
I'm currently running a Gigabyte EP35-DS3R paired with a Q6600 and have been very happy with it. I was a bit bummed when I saw it did not have onboard firewire, but when I thought about it, I have NEVER used firewire, so no big deal. |
| |
May 14th, 2008, 06:03 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 95
|
ya, i don't use firewire everyday, but I do use it when I transfer recordings from the camcorder to a HDD for compression or editing. USB 2.0 leaves it too choppy so I just run it via 1394
I am liking the GIGABYTE GA-EP35C-DS3R though, esp with the ability to upgrade to DDR3 later on.
I think that paired with the Q6600 quad and the 9800GTX should be plenty of power for a few more years. Hope so anyways.
So how much power should I be feeding this monstrosity ? Remember I am going to be running 5 HDD's and maybe Two DVD burners. |
| |
May 14th, 2008, 06:13 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,229
|
Corsair HX620 would be a good choice.
Upgrading to DDR3 later would be a waste and unnecessary. DDR2 offers plenty of bandwidth and overclockability. DDR3 provides virtually zero added benefit in real world applications. By the time DDR3 becomes necessary or even the new standard, Nehalem (Intel's next micro-architecture) will be here and Intel would have moved to a completely new socket. Think about it this way, why "upgrade" to 4GB of DDR3 when you already have 4GB of DDR2? Especially when we're talking about the same system. That's the difference between EP35 and EP35C. The EP35 is DDR2 only. I've also never been a fan of boards that have two different memory standards. They almost always favor one over the other in terms of performance, stability, compatibility, and tweakability. |
| |
May 14th, 2008, 07:44 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 95
| |
| |
May 14th, 2008, 09:10 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,229
|
Looks good. Personally I would opt with the Corsair PSU over the OCZ. There have been several OCZ models that exhibit too much ripple in the current when loaded to 80% or more of their capacity. The OCZ will work, but the Corsair is a higher quality PSU, even if it's rated lower.
If you're curious, http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817139002 |
| |
May 14th, 2008, 10:10 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 95
|
Added to the list, Now @ $1,344.80 Shipped $1264.80 With Rebates
THX for all of the help, Very Much Appreciated |
| |
May 14th, 2008, 10:20 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Folding@home since 1862!
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Folding@Home
Posts: 7,916
|
I know I'm coming in late here, but you could save some $ and get the CM690 instead of the Antec 900. It offers the same, if not better air flow, cable management is super easy, and of course, it's cheaper too. And if your into modding, this case is a modders dream.. |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |