Thread: Photoshop Vs. Paint.Net or Gimp
-
February 9th, 2008, 11:07 AM #1Ultimate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Posts
- 1,477
Photoshop Vs. Paint.Net or Gimp
Respond if you have any experience with all 3 please.
I recently quit using Photoshop 6 as it "mysteriously" quit working on the box I have had it on for over a year, previously had it on another box since it released. Calls to Adobe were pointless as they feel it's time for me to upgrade. 6 did everything I needed it to.
Played with the gimp a bit, the impression I get is it has serious limitations and functionality.
I was then given Adobe Photoshop Elements 5 as a gift (used from brother in law) and although it impresses me how tasks that were seemingly complex in ps6 are now automated in the low end elements. However I find the program extremely buggy and simple things like compositing will not work. Periodically when going to resize an image the dimensions fields are blocked out and the program experiences unknown errors and closes.
At this point I am not going to spend retail for cs3 and if anything lean towards the new elements 6 for 85 bucks. Obviously I worry about being stuck with another turd like elements 5 was on this system (at least 5 was free, lol).
I have dabbled with Paint.net and it seems an impressive program probably more on scale with cs3. I don't exactly need all that unless your experiences state Paint.Net rocks! It has a whole new learning curve away from the adobe products that I am familiar with if not impressed by.
Thanks for any input!
-
February 9th, 2008, 04:25 PM #2
I personally have never used paint.net I have heard great things but never tried., I have however used gimp, cs2 and cs3 and I personally have never seen gimp fail in any areas so I'm not sure where you've seen limitations.
I can say if you don't need all the tools paint.net has or even gimp has then you obviously won't need something like cs3. If you are just doing simple edits then paint looks like it should cover all your needs. For resizing I don't even bother I use infranview its fast, free, easy and does batch conversions which I love.
TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!
“Because The People Who Are Crazy Enough To Think They Can Change The World, Are The Ones Who Do.”
-
February 9th, 2008, 04:31 PM #3
Paint.Net isn't that great. It is a replacement for Paint really and that is about it (lately it has been starting to get quite slow for loading though).
I haven't really used Gimp much..."The problem with quotations on the internet is that the sources are hard to verify" - Abraham Lincoln
-
February 9th, 2008, 04:48 PM #4
I'm learning the Gimp, I find that it can do alot. The more I study the more I learn that it can do. I have never used Photoshop. I do like the Gimp price.
Asus M4A785TD-V EDO, Phenom II X4 945 Deneb 3.0GHz 4 Gig DDR3 1333 Win7 64 Home
-
February 9th, 2008, 06:05 PM #5
http://www.gimpshop.com/ may be to your liking as a former Photoshop user. It adjusts the Gimp to a more PS look and feel.
-
February 9th, 2008, 07:54 PM #6Ultimate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Posts
- 1,477
Limitations as far as filters and special effects and my ability being familiar with it's layout. Obviously my limitations are the issue it would seem. It really stinks having to learn something new.
I APPRECIATE all of your input!
Ex I know you do a lot of Web Development thanks for the advice. Time to learn the Gimp inside and out.
Thanks for the info on batch conversion Rich!
-
February 9th, 2008, 08:04 PM #7
When I was using gimp I found it could use most photoshop filters, they have to be .8bf files and I think you needed to install an add-on. But just about ever filter I wanted to use worked fine. There is a pretty good learning curve but no different from photoshop which I actually think has a steeper curve.
TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!
“Because The People Who Are Crazy Enough To Think They Can Change The World, Are The Ones Who Do.”
-
July 8th, 2011, 04:17 AM #8Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 1
Paint.NET is pretty standard if you dont have any addons installed
however once u get a collection of the free to download addons it is EASILY comparable to photoshop
-
February 28th, 2012, 12:02 AM #9
-
April 27th, 2012, 05:01 AM #10Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 20
I've used Photoshop and Gimp .Photoshop has better user interface, features and reliability. And is perfect in editing large multi-layer images that Gimp can't handle. Gimp is fine if you don’t need many features and it is not expensive.
-
April 27th, 2012, 09:03 AM #11
And by not expensive you mean free
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Troubles wirelessly browsing the net.
By Cbstiles in forum Networking and InternetReplies: 21Last Post: February 18th, 2008, 10:19 PM -
Overhaul of net addresses begins
By nemowolf in forum Tech News DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: February 8th, 2008, 12:46 AM -
Cannot install Net Framwork 2.0
By Mombo323 in forum Applications and Operating SystemsReplies: 2Last Post: January 7th, 2008, 12:21 AM -
.NET Framework installation error in XP
By local host in forum Technical SupportReplies: 7Last Post: January 5th, 2008, 01:03 AM -
PhotoShop, Fireworks, and Paint Shop pro 7
By PyroSama in forum Graphic Design and Digital PhotographyReplies: 23Last Post: November 14th, 2002, 01:36 PM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote



No doubt about it. It's a shame we can't have a nationwide discussion on such topics, as they do require a bit of economic intelligence, which many voters unfortunately do not have. Instead we get...
Who Pays Corporate Income Taxes ?