A case against JPG  | | | 
August 18th, 2004, 12:58 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
| | Father V2.0
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Mexicali, Mexico
Posts: 5,138
|
nice article out... looks like it will have an application at my work. | 
|  | |
August 18th, 2004, 02:27 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 81
|
Saving my pictures in .png like Outpatient recommends is fine, however when uploading to Wal-Mart for prints, they accept only .tif & .jpeg. When I get the prints returned, the overall results are poor on glossy paper. Is there a way to improve results prior to upload while using .tif or .jpeg?
Is there a way to increase the DPI in Photoshop or something? | |
| | |
August 18th, 2004, 02:33 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
| | Best To Avoid Me
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Under Your Bed
Posts: 8,863
| (I bet this is what OuT would say)
It depends on the current resolution of the image. You can't increase the size of the image without losing quality. You can increase the dpi in Photoshop without quality loss, but as you increase the dpi the physical size of the image will shrink.
As far as getting the image to Walmart, use TIF. And make sure to use no compression or LZW compression so there will be no loss in pixels.  | |
| | |
August 18th, 2004, 02:42 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: ::[Toronto]::
Posts: 665
|
i was making some logo files and when my client saw the jpeg he strated asking why was it so blurry, it's funny, the .gif turned out better. for some reason i've always thought .gif is worst than jpeg due to it's size | |
| | |
August 18th, 2004, 02:45 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: cali
Posts: 914
|
A while back I noticed PNG quality was comparable to JPG and most of the time the size was smaller, so I've been using that ever since for all my images (as evident in this recent thread: http://www.techimo.com/forum/t108539.html). | |
| | |
August 21st, 2004, 02:32 AM
|
#36 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,253
|
Good work, sometimes I can test a webpage through the web and sometimes pngs randomly dont even show up. I will got to the png location, say www.r4nd.com/rand.png and it will show a red box with the right size, but with no image! I'm still puzzled what is up with that. | |
| | |
August 22nd, 2004, 01:41 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 418
| | |
| | |
August 30th, 2004, 06:17 AM
|
#38 (permalink)
| | Bringing Da Funk
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Da Bronx, NY
Posts: 3,985
|
Only one thing to say here........................no not aliens.........................
All Hail OuTpaTienT!!! | |
| | |
September 13th, 2004, 05:04 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Savannah
Posts: 152
|
Out has done it again. Hmmm.... is there anything out can't do? ;P | |
| | |
November 24th, 2004, 08:04 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 89
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by JayMan Off to read it now....
jkrohn, IE6 still doesn't render PNG with transparent parts properly. Maybe M$ will get it right in version 7??? whenever that will be out....
JayMan | But IE7 is out | |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions  | | | | |   Recent Discussions  | | | | |
 |
hardware
prices 
