ati radeon 9600SE to nVidia gforce4 TI4600  | | |
June 26th, 2004, 04:16 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16
| ati radeon 9600SE to nVidia gforce4 TI4600
I have a fairly new ati radeon 9600se in my desktop, and i want to buy a nVidia gforce4TI4600 to replace it. Will the performance be better than the 9600se? |
| |
June 26th, 2004, 04:26 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 986
|
i would say if your going to upgrade, go with a 9800pro. I'm not even sure if you can find many ti4600's any more. |
| |
June 26th, 2004, 04:31 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: cali
Posts: 914
|
You'll definitely get better performance with the Ti 4600. |
| |
June 26th, 2004, 05:04 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,991
|
the performance gain will be marginal and you would be going to a dx 8 card |
| |
June 26th, 2004, 05:22 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: cali
Posts: 914
|
The 9600SE is too slow for any real DX9 games. You'll get near 9600XT performance with the Ti 4600 in DX8 which is a far better tradeoff. |
| |
June 26th, 2004, 06:14 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | just passin thru
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SW, OHIO
Posts: 5,826
|
I get around 14,000 in 3dmark 2k1 with my Chaintec GeForce 4 Ti-4600 4x AGP.. I don't think the 9600se could match that. Though it might perform a bit better in 3dmark 2k3.
__________________
P4 3.2 'E', 4GB DDR400, XFX Geforce 6600GT 256MB AGP, MSI 865PE Neo2-P, WD S-ATA II 500GB HDD, Win. Vista
Last edited by Sweeper : June 26th, 2004 at 06:16 PM.
|
| |
June 26th, 2004, 09:16 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16
|
how about the ati radeon 9600se 128mb to a ATI CHIPSET RADEON 9200 256mb how much would the performance decrease or increase? |
| |
June 26th, 2004, 09:27 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | No pants, Wearin'a Helmet
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Coeur D' Alene,Idaho
Posts: 3,459
| http://graphics.tomshardware.com/gra...charts-03.html
The 9600SE is crappier than the 9200 but if you got the 9200 there would be almost no visual difference, just go with a higher end card such as the 9800Pro or NP and you will be fine for a while. If you absolutely have to upgrade though and don't have a large budget then just go with the 9600Pro http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...102-301&depa=0
$126
Oh yah and the 256mb is not worth the extra it costs, it isn't better, well I don't know about the 9200 but on the 9800 128vs256 the 256 most of the time had the exact same or lower fps than the 128mb version
__________________
Dr. Cox -Newbie, Stay. Oohhh what a good boy you are, Newbie..... DEAR GOD JUDY HOW MUCH PRODUCT DO YOU USE?
J.D -None. It's like this when I wake up
|
| |
June 26th, 2004, 09:45 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 460
|
yes, video cards with 256MB of memory are typically a few frames slower, because cheaper quality video memory is used, or you could say slower memory.....
excluding the 9600se, i'm not sure how it would perform, taken from the tom's hardware website, this is, from best to worst:
1. radeon 9800 xt
2. geforce fx 5950 ultra
3. radeon 9800 pro 128MB
4. radeon 9800 pro 256MB
5. geforce fx 5900 ultra
6. geforce fx 5800 ultra
7. radeon 9700 pro
8. radeon 9800
9. geforce fx 5900
10. geforce fx 5900 xt
11. radeon 9700
12. geforce fx 5800
13. geforce fx 5700 ultra
14. radeon 9600 xt
15. radeon 9500 pro
16. radeon 9800 se
17. radeon 9600 pro
18. geforce ti 4600
19. geforce ti 4400
20. geforce fx 5700
21. geforce ti 4200 8x agp
22. geforce ti 4200 64mb
23. radeon 9500
24. geforce fx 5600 ultra
25. geforce ti 4200 128mb
26. radeon 9500 64mb
27. geforce fx 5600
28. radeon 9600
29. geforce fx 5200 ultra
30. radeon 8500 64mb
31. radeon 8500 128mb
32. radeon 9000 pro
33. geforce fx 5200
34. radeon 9200 64mb
35. radeon 9200 128mb 36. radeon 9600 se <--- oopsie it's so bad i didnt even put it in my list =P it's the ONLY 64-bit card tested!!!!!!!!! *EDIT!!* no at times it can be put from 30-36... but STILL it's 64-bit
woo that was lots to type =P
Last edited by extreme_gamer : June 26th, 2004 at 10:05 PM.
|
| |
June 26th, 2004, 09:54 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16
|
but would the fps become higher or lower with the ATI CHIPSET RADEON 9200 256mb, since i think it is 128-bit so wouldnt the memory bandwith become higher as well? |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | My House of Warez [FS & FT] | SiliconJon | Traders Forum: Buy, Sell, Trade | 27 | October 29th, 2003 07:45 PM | | 9500 Pro or ti4600? | monroeski | Graphics Cards and Displays | 69 | March 22nd, 2003 11:54 AM | | suggestions | Vagabond | Graphics Cards and Displays | 10 | November 18th, 2002 08:48 PM | | Nvidia or ATI? | Xster | Graphics Cards and Displays | 29 | July 31st, 2002 03:57 PM | | Who makes dual CRT cards | Grog | Graphics Cards and Displays | 21 | May 6th, 2002 06:17 AM | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |