+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. February 4th, 2002, 09:43 PM #1
    camaro
    camaro is offline
    Ultimate Member camaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    1,719

    MX440 benchmarks

     
    These are pretty premature. I don't understand why they don't use the same drivers for GF4 as they do for GF3 in that test. Then they blame the low score on drivers. Seems kinda like something Homer Simpson would do.

    http://www.tbreak.com/hard/grfx/msi_gf4mx440/page1.html

    Looks like the MX line still sucks.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. February 4th, 2002, 09:49 PM #2
    vass0922
    vass0922 is offline
    Not Really a Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    27,856
    I think this review could be thought of as nearly useless altogether. Possibly not the final silicon and definately not the final drivers. Whats the point? It should go up in performance.

    That'd be like eating a cake w/o the icing added...lol
    Sure its "finished" but not quite "finished"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Recommended Sites: ResellerRatings Store Reviews