Thread: ATI Radeon 9250
-
January 28th, 2005, 03:03 PM #1
ATI Radeon 9250
Since my computer is only limited to PCI cards, is the ATI Radeon 9250 PCI 256MB card work well enough? I want to run some games like Roller Coaster Tycoon 3 and the Sims 2. Don't tell me t get a new motherboard or a new PC, because I don't have the money for that.
Is there any other PCI card that will work better than the ATI Radeon 9250 256MB PCI card? Or should I just stick with that? I heard its the best PCI card ATI can offer...
Anybody who is using this card can tell me all about it!
I'd love to know how a brand new PCI card works instead of the built in Intel Extreme Graphics!
Oh, and one more thing! I was thinking for a bit, and wondering, since the graphics I use right now is the laughably horrible extreme graphics, is onboard, and uses the system's memory, and the 9250 is a separate card that doesn't scam resources off the system, will it make my computer go faster, RAM-wise?Last edited by mjolnir1134; January 28th, 2005 at 03:13 PM.
-
January 28th, 2005, 03:51 PM #2
How much system ram do you have right now?
-
January 28th, 2005, 05:06 PM #3
-
January 28th, 2005, 05:14 PM #4
i think you can get a 5700 LE in pci
the free ram will make your system go a little faster but what will be more important is the cpu cycles it was using up.....obviously the most noticable place will be in gamesHey who turned sigs on?
-
January 29th, 2005, 08:27 PM #5
The fastest PCI video card for gaming is the Xtasy Radeon 9100 (dont be confused by the 9*** names, higher isnt always better) Only problem is, its very hard to find it as they stopped making them. Good luck tho!
Edit: Oh, and if you are going to get the 9250, MAKE SURE you see the words "128-BIT" on it. DO NOT get if it is 64-bit. Its a horribly crippled version.Last edited by Overclocked412; January 29th, 2005 at 08:46 PM.
-
January 29th, 2005, 08:46 PM #6
Posted another post, so you see my edited post above ^ Important edit.
-
January 29th, 2005, 09:58 PM #7Where should I look for on the box so it says 128-bit on it?
Originally Posted by Overclocked412
-
January 29th, 2005, 11:32 PM #8Yes the box will say if it is 128-bit or 64-bit
Originally Posted by mjolnir1134
Cute
-
January 30th, 2005, 12:39 AM #9
I'd rather get a PCI Nvidia FX5200 or FX5500, much more powerful than an ATI 9250, and do support DirectX 9.
Probably more expensive though...
-
January 30th, 2005, 03:34 AM #10God you could be no more wrong.
Originally Posted by skuz
-
January 30th, 2005, 03:36 AM #11
Go have a nice read here about the best PCI-Cards.
http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=445
Like I said, the Visiontek Xtasy 9100 is the best available.Last edited by Overclocked412; January 30th, 2005 at 03:38 AM.
-
February 1st, 2005, 08:31 PM #12
Why would I be wrong ? From what I read, the 9250 is a slightly better 9200 which in turn was a variant of the 8500.
I don't know about the clock speeds, but still no DX9 support.
Do you know numbers I don't know about or are you just sold to ATI ?
I personally am not sold to a make : I have a low end card from each.
-
February 1st, 2005, 08:38 PM #13
What i didnt see up there was the 5700LE which i think would beat them all.
3.2ghz HT P4
1024kingston DDR2
ATI 9800pro 256mb
160gb sata raid hd
-
February 1st, 2005, 08:40 PM #14
Maybe. Comparing the specs from 5500 to 5700LE would give the answer.
-
February 1st, 2005, 09:13 PM #15Just having directX9 support doesn't make it a better card.
Originally Posted by skuz
-
February 1st, 2005, 09:17 PM #16
Originally Posted by mike_sanfil
sooooooooo true, i had to use a fx5200 128mb vid card in my comp for a while and it really performed horibbly, once i put my ti4200 128mb 8x agp in it i felt like i was on a totally different comp and thats a whole generation leap. the ti4200 doesnt support dx9 like the 5200 but in FPS and quality it KILLS the fx5200Main PC: AMD FX-8350 / 16gb DDR3 1600 / AMD 7970GE 1200mhz Core & 1600mhz Mem / Win7 Pro 64bit
File Server: AMD Opteron 180 / 3gb DDR400 / Nvidia 6200 / WinXP Home 32bit / Lubuntu 12.10
Laptop: HP-Compaq nc8430/ Intel CoreDuo T2400 / 2gb DDR2 667/ Ati x1600 / WinXP Pro 32bit
-
February 1st, 2005, 09:32 PM #17
That article that overclocked412 posted is from 2003. It is very likely that you can get a better card than the one he is suggesting. I would look into the FX 5700 LE to, it is probably a lot faster than the 9100.
-
February 1st, 2005, 09:56 PM #18no. not a lot, about 15% maybe, but definitelly not a lot since the 5700LE is basically a 5200U or a 5500.
Originally Posted by Whos Theo?
-
August 11th, 2005, 10:29 AM #19
when i had my old comp I had a radeon 9100 pci and it blew a**, even OC'ed..
I still have the card in a drawer
it barely played CSLast edited by Lord_Infamous; August 11th, 2005 at 10:34 AM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Help >
By erhan28 in forum Graphics Cards and DisplaysReplies: 0Last Post: November 16th, 2004, 07:06 PM -
looking for drivers
By EpyonMelee in forum General Tech DiscussionReplies: 7Last Post: October 20th, 2004, 01:04 PM -
Radeon 10,000
By MatrixmaN in forum Graphics Cards and DisplaysReplies: 20Last Post: July 13th, 2004, 04:26 AM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote


Fix your oil leak/burn-off. Worn piston rings or a leak, Whir?
Is It Just Me? v233893843