7800GTX at THG  | | |
July 26th, 2005, 11:55 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Full Time WoW Addict
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 8,564
|
__________________ -NWO® ---6000 point club-----
A64 X2 4600+
2x512MB Geil DDR500
2x512MB Kingmax DDR500
@DDR266 speeds
Sapphire x1900GT |
| |
July 26th, 2005, 12:06 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: A hole in the wall.
Posts: 869
|
Nice find nwo. I'm still kinda dissapointed with the 7800GTX. It's not nearly as ground breaking as the 6800 series. Hopefully software will start to take advantage of it in the future.
__________________
Wake up you're dead.
|
| |
July 26th, 2005, 12:10 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Full Time WoW Addict
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 8,564
|
That's exactly what I'm hoping for...
It's not only software, but it's also the rest of the system that's bottlenecking it, especially the CPU  Which leads me to think that the reason why the difference at small resolutions (between 7800GTX and x850XT PE) is so small is because of CPU bottleneck, but once the resolution is turned up, there's always a minimum of a 30% fps increase, usually around 15-30 and more fps difference between the 2 cards. |
| |
July 27th, 2005, 01:24 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 2,672
|
It still smokes the other cards.
Daaaaaaamn
__________________
-Space
|
| |
July 27th, 2005, 01:29 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Australia, Oceania
Posts: 699
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by duckhunter-deux Nice find nwo. I'm still kinda dissapointed with the 7800GTX. It's not nearly as ground breaking as the 6800 series. Hopefully software will start to take advantage of it in the future. | actually, nvidia did more between the 6XXX series and the 7XXX series than ati did between the 9XXX series and the x800/x600/x700 series\
both were essentialyl core optimizations and tweaks, but nvidia did quite a bit more
__________________
wang
|
| |
July 27th, 2005, 01:54 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Now in the nicer ghetto
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: PA
Posts: 10,533
|
but i would still take any one of those cards  |
| |
July 27th, 2005, 02:26 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: right here
Posts: 2,440
|
Hey but wait, why are the cards running in SLI performing nearly double the single cards and the last gen SLI beating the next Gen singles in Halo, Unreal, FarCry and Doom 3. I though SLI was a bunch of hooey. [insert sarcastic confused face]
__________________ size=1 rocks |
| |
July 27th, 2005, 05:49 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Full Time WoW Addict
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 8,564
|
SLI is great, if the drivers are optimized for it to be used in a game that is
That just proves that there isn't a 50% performance difference between a 7800GTX and a 6800U, since SLI gives you about 50% more juice. |
| |
July 27th, 2005, 06:47 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: right here
Posts: 2,440
|
Well, I understand what you mean but the actual numbers for Doom 3 for instance is the 7800 is 25% faster than a single 6800 at high res. The SLI 6800 is just over 100% faster than a single 7800. |
| |
July 27th, 2005, 09:07 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Full Time WoW Addict
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 8,564
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by rabidaardvark The SLI 6800 is just over 100% faster than a single 7800. | in doom3 
I don't see the SLI 6800 being anywhere near 100% faster than a single 7800GTX in any benchie  |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |