+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 59

Thread: The GTX 560 TI

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1

    The GTX 560 TI

     
    Well, I just got the beast and installed the PSU and ran Furmark. At a resolution of 1024x640 I get a score of 2722. What I don't understand is that when I go to Furmarks's website they show Radeon HD 6950's that are at about 3500 points! Are they using crossfire or what!

    What are your scores btw?

    Found this GeForce GTX 560 Ti review

    I was wondering. What kind of PSU would I need to one day do SLI with these cards? My current PSU is these. Newegg.com - Antec High Current Gamer Series HCG-520 520W ATX12V v2.3 / EPS12V v2.91 80 PLUS BRONZE Certified Active PFC Power Supply

    I plan on building an AMD 6 core machine sometime latter and maybe SLI two of these monsters.

    I never did a SLI config. before. How is it done? I noticed that the card has a connection point on top. I'm assuming this is for SLI and you use a cable of some sort.
    Last edited by Taxmancometh; August 12th, 2011 at 03:01 AM.

  2. #2
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,362
    1024x640 is a really odd resolution.
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  3. #3
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,362
    What settings are you running the benchmark at (Antialiasing/MSAA Setting)
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  4. #4
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,362
    Using version 1.7.0 of Furmark, at 1920x1080 res, 4x AA setting, Full Screen, with my GTX 470 running at stock speeds.

    I get 5160 for a Score.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The GTX 560 TI-furmark-1.7.0-gtx-470-core-i7-920.jpg  
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    I just edited my post above. Let me run Furmark at those resolutions.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by ShyguyXPC View Post
    Using version 1.7.0 of Furmark, at 1920x1080 res, 4x AA setting, Full Screen, with my GTX 470 running at stock speeds.

    I get 5160 for a Score.

    Using version 1.9.1 I get 1073 points. Is my card bad or what?!

    Nvidia driver version 280.26

  7. #7
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,362
    I only get 1285 on version 1.9.1 (all the same settings as the other run, Full Screen 1920x1080, 4x AA, other settings unchanged defaults)

    Could be the version that was run to bench the card that could be giving the low score.


    Check out that Max temp on this run with this version
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The GTX 560 TI-furmark-1.9.1-gtx-470-core-i7-920.jpg  
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    Yeah, my temp peaks at about 90 C.

  9. #9
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,362
    My higher score on this run could be the CPU I'm running, i7 920, could be a bit of a bottleneck somewhere.

    But I wouldn't be too concerned if your getting a lower score, as these are just benchmarks and not really in game performance measures.


    as to SLI, as far as I know, there are no current AMD chipsets that will support SLI, so that sort of option with AMD is a no go right now.


    I forget, but what CPU do you have right now?

    I can't remember, but did you say your still running Windows XP? If so, that could be part of the problem too (DX9 and no DX10 being run, reducing performance a bit)

    As to a PSU for SLI, a good 600-650W would be plenty, We commented a bit on it in the BF3 thread: Battlefield 3 Thread
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  10. #10
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,362
    Quote Originally Posted by Taxmancometh View Post
    Yeah, my temp peaks at about 90 C.
    Furmark tends to run cards hotter than most games and software will, as well as boost power usage, which is why a lot of review sites no longer use it for benchmarking.
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    Here's what I get.

    Q6600 2.4 GHz Win XP 64 DirectX 10

    I use to run an overclock but it wouldn't hold anymore and I don't know why. Board is a Gigabyte 965P-DS3
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The GTX 560 TI-furmark.jpg  
    Last edited by Taxmancometh; August 12th, 2011 at 03:21 AM.

  12. #12
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,362
    Thats odd, the settings show 4x AA, but the results are showing 8x (8 Samples) for AA.

    I'd give it another run and make sure its running 4x AA, and see what you get.

    But I noticed your OS is Server 2003 (Basically XP), so could be some sort of DX issues.

    What Nvidia Drivers are you using?
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by ShyguyXPC View Post
    Thats odd, the settings show 4x AA, but the results are showing 8x (8 Samples) for AA.

    I'd give it another run and make sure its running 4x AA, and see what you get.

    But I noticed your OS is Server 2003 (Basically XP), so could be some sort of DX issues.

    What Nvidia Drivers are you using?
    Nvidia driver version 280.26 latest.

    I'll give it another run. Yeah, I know the damn thing says 8 for samples and I don't know why.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    Well, I can't seem to get rid of the 8 samples no matter what setting I set to. I tried 0 samples and here is what I get.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The GTX 560 TI-furmark2.jpg  

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    This is what DXdiag says.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The GTX 560 TI-dxdiag1.jpg   The GTX 560 TI-dxdiag2.jpg  

  16. #16
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,362
    as to DX, like I mentioned a few days back, or last week, even though you have DX10 installed it will only use the DX9 part of DX10, in Windows XP OS's.


    Could be thats part of the problem. DX9 score being a bit lower than DX10.




    Download, Install and run this Demo (its a Non Playable Game demo, Its mainly DX9, though I think the game has some DX10 support as well), but the Demo was released as DX9.

    X³: Terran Conflict Rolling Demo (unplayable) download - Mod DB

    Its actual game renderings.

    Run it in 1920x1080 with everything jacked up, I'll post a screen shot or two after this reply.

    Attaching a screen shot of my settings (forgot to checkmark "Run As Benchmark")


    Once its run, it will pop up with a window asking to save the results plus show the average frame rate of the run.

    I've been using this Benchmark and a previous one for a few years now when doing comparisons. rather than relying solely on 3DMark and Furmark and others.


    But the Benchmark takes a while, as it goes through 3 or 4 stages, so just sit back, enjoy the scenery and the music/sound with it

    (the last part of the demo you'll get a thrill out of if you've never played this game or the series before, I have the 2nd game in the series, as well as the 3rd and 4th, and YES you can get out of your ship in game in space suit, and some stations and ships are THAT BIG, unfortunately you can't really go in them and explore)
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The GTX 560 TI-x3tc-rolling-demo-8-12-2011-gtx-470-run.jpg  
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  17. #17
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,362
    Results from the run on my end (copied from the Benchmark saved file it creates):

    --------------------------
    X3 - Terran Conflict
    --------------------------
    Game Version: 1.2.0.0

    Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.110622-1506)
    DirectX Version: DirectX 11
    Graphics Card Info: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 [4059 MB] Driver: 8.17.0012.6658
    CPU Info: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz
    Usable System Memory: 6144 MB


    Video Settings During Benchmark:
    Screen Resolution: 1920 x 1080 * [32], fullscreen
    Using Shader Profile: 3.0
    Antialias Mode: 8x
    Anisotropic Mode: 16x

    Graphics & Shader Settings:
    Texture Quality: high
    Shader Quality: high
    High Quality Bumpmaps: enabled
    Environment Mapping: enabled
    Glow Filter: enabled
    Ship Color Variations: enabled
    More Dynamic Lights: enabled
    Used Vertexsize: 40 bytes

    Framerates
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Scene "Trade" 40.0 average fps 15.0 minimum fps 92.0 maximum fps
    Scene "Fight" 88.3 average fps 33.0 minimum fps 198.0 maximum fps
    Scene "Build" 115.6 average fps 67.0 minimum fps 201.0 maximum fps
    Scene "Think" 52.1 average fps 27.0 minimum fps 100.0 maximum fps

    Overall average framerate: 74.0 fps


    (c)2008 EGOSOFT
    For more information visit EGOSOFT · News · Current
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    It will be awhile before this downloads. I have 350 k speed from the server.

    Edit! Tried a new server, got 1.1 MB/sec.
    Last edited by Taxmancometh; August 12th, 2011 at 04:08 AM.

  19. #19
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,362
    ouch
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    WOW! I HAVE GOT TO GET THIS GAME! I ran the damn thing forgeting to run as benchmark. So I had a smoke, came back and was still on, I was like WTH. So I hit esc and found out that I didn't run as bench mark. :hehe:

    Here are my results.


    --------------------------
    X3 - Terran Conflict
    --------------------------
    Game Version: 1.2.0.0

    Operating System: Windows XP Professional x64 Edition (5.2, Build 3790) Service Pack 2 (3790.srv03_sp2_rtm.070216-1710)
    DirectX Version: DirectX 10.0 (4.10.0000.5515)
    Graphics Card Info: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti [1024 MB] Driver: 6.14.0012.8026
    CPU Info: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.4GHz
    Usable System Memory: 6142 MB


    Video Settings During Benchmark:
    Screen Resolution: 1920 x 1080 * [32], fullscreen
    Using Shader Profile: 3.0
    Antialias Mode: 8x
    Anisotropic Mode: 16x

    Graphics & Shader Settings:
    Texture Quality: high
    Shader Quality: high
    High Quality Bumpmaps: enabled
    Environment Mapping: enabled
    Glow Filter: enabled
    Ship Color Variations: enabled
    More Dynamic Lights: enabled
    Used Vertexsize: 40 bytes

    Framerates
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Scene "Trade" 25.0 average fps 7.0 minimum fps 58.0 maximum fps
    Scene "Fight" 55.1 average fps 20.0 minimum fps 131.0 maximum fps
    Scene "Build" 75.6 average fps 42.0 minimum fps 183.0 maximum fps
    Scene "Think" 34.2 average fps 17.0 minimum fps 66.0 maximum fps

    Overall average framerate: 47.5 fps


    (c)2008 EGOSOFT
    For more information visit EGOSOFT · News · Current

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. GTX 460 OC vs. 8800 GTX win XP
    By vincentgustav in forum Graphics Cards and Displays
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 26th, 2011, 12:12 AM
  2. Nvidia gtx 470/gtx 480 to have disabled Cores.
    By no1_vern in forum Graphics Cards and Displays
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 23rd, 2010, 10:54 AM
  3. GTX 260's in SLI or single GTX 295??
    By dgb0002 in forum PC Modification
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: March 2nd, 2010, 10:58 AM
  4. Power for a gtx 260 or gtx 280
    By j.woody in forum Graphics Cards and Displays
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: March 29th, 2009, 03:11 PM
  5. 8800 GTX 768MB or 9800 GTX 512MB?
    By jamhough22 in forum Graphics Cards and Displays
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: June 29th, 2008, 02:32 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Recommended Sites: ResellerRatings Store Reviews