February 13th, 2003, 10:53 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 150
|  Your 3Dmark 2001se and 2003 Scores?
What were your 3dmark 2001 and 2003 scores and your pc specs? 
My scores were
3dmark 2001- 12,687
3dmark 2003-3295
athlon 2600+
saphire radeon 9700 pro
1 gig ddr pc 3200 ram
asus A7N8X deluxe Nforce2 mobo
download 3dmark 2001 and 2003 at www.madonion.com
| 
|  | |
February 13th, 2003, 11:58 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 311
|
hmm, that 2001 scores seems a bit low
i used a ATI 9700 pro, 256 pc3200 (kingmax), and a p4 1.6 oced to 2.24 and i benched 1310
| |
| | |
February 14th, 2003, 12:06 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Tatum,Tx
Posts: 426
|
amd xp 1800
512mb ddr
gf4 4200
2k1 - 10,092
2k3 - 1543
| |
| | |
February 14th, 2003, 12:19 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | norml.org
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,436
|
Cant get 2003 to run on either machine---bios update/drivers/DX9 blah blah blah---
I sure got 2001 screamin tho from screwin around with it:
P4 2.4b @3001
Leadtec 128 4400 @ 325/725 Rivatuned
15,440 3DMarks---up from 13,900 | |
| | |
February 14th, 2003, 12:30 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Banned by everybody
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,576
|
For some reason I get an awfully low score.
My score was 590 with the following rig:
Asus A7V8X
XP1700+ @ 1.83Ghz (333Mhz fsb)
512Mb PC2700 2-2-2 settings
Asus Geforce 4 Ti4200 @ default
Quantum 30Gb ata66 7200rpm
DirectX 9.0
29.42 drivers
I know for sure I should be getting more like 1500-2000, but could it really be the drivers that are too old??
Ahh well, I received my maxtor 80Gb ata100 7200rpm disc back from rma, so a fresh clean install should do the trick.
Gonna use the 4.45 hyperion drivers, dx9 and the 42.70 drivers, that should give quite a boost over my current score.
Will keep ya guys informed as soon as I have a new benchmark.
Ultima
Last edited by Ultima : February 14th, 2003 at 12:34 PM.
| |
| | |
February 14th, 2003, 12:39 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 795
|
Hmm.
-AthlonXp1700+
-512 MB DDR
-OC'd Geforce3 Ti200 205core 501ram
-My 3dMark2001 was 7954.
-Still waiting to get 2k3 but I'm sure it will buture my system...Any official GeForce FX benchmarks on the 2k3 Version yet?
__________________
When you began, we ended.
| |
| | |
February 14th, 2003, 12:55 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 435
|
3D Mark 2001:
1.4ghz Athlon Tbird
512mb PC133
ATI Radeon 9500 Pro
Is 4500 3DMarks bad for that Rig? | |
| | |
February 14th, 2003, 01:26 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: MA
Posts: 617
| Quote: Originally posted by MatrixmaN
Is 4500 3DMarks bad for that Rig? | Yeah, it seems a little low. You should be above 7000 with that rig... | |
| | |
February 14th, 2003, 01:33 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 435
|
What do you think could be the cause of the low score?
I have about 80 gigs.
20gigs on primary drive, broken into 3 partitions at about 6gigs each.
60gigs on backup drive though I have about 8gig free.
XP Pro drive has like 3gigs free.....could it be free space or clutter? I defragmented and it didn't really help the score much.
I'm not sure what else could cause the problem. | |
| | |
February 14th, 2003, 01:44 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: MA
Posts: 617
|
Run "dxdiag" and make sure that you have "AGP texture acceleration" enabled. | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | 
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | |   Most Active Discussions  | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | 
|
hardware
prices 
