home hardware prices news articles forums photos user reviews
Go Back   Tech Support Forums - TechIMO.com > TechIMO Community > IMO Community
Ask a Tech Support Question (free)!

Senate reaches deal, no "nuclear option" needed

Reply
Get bargains at  »  Dealighted.com
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Currently Active Users: 1510
Discussions: 200,906, Posts: 2,378,914, Members: 246,276
Old May 24th, 2005, 12:27 AM   Digg it!   #1 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,821
Senate reaches deal, no "nuclear option" needed

but who knows who this is good for etc

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...M_Exclude=Juno

---------

WASHINGTON — Bucking leaders in both parties, a bipartisan group of lawmakers agreed Monday night to a deal that avoids a clash over Senate rules and clears the path for confirmation of most — but not all — of the conservative judges President Bush aims to put on the bench.



The agreement by 14 lawmakers pulled the chamber back from the brink of a battle that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Tennessee Republican, pledged to win — depriving him of the chance to show that he could muscle conservative judges through a bitterly divided chamber and leaving him forced to accept a deal that he admitted fell short of his goals.

"It has some good news and it has some disappointing news," Frist said on the floor shortly after the agreement was signed.

Neither Frist nor his Democratic counterpart, Harry Reid of Nevada, can block the agreement, because without the Republicans and Democrats who signed it, neither side has enough votes to win a challenge over judges on the Senate floor.

Still, Frist and his advisors tried to claim victory, even as Democrats said the deal gave the Tennessean a defeat. Five of the seven judges Democrats blocked in the last Congress will get the up or down votes Frist wanted, and the Democrats who signed the agreement said they would only join filibusters against other judges under "extraordinary circumstances" in the future.

"Tonight it is possible that this unfortunate chapter in our history can close, because this arrangement makes it much less likely — indeed almost impossible — for such mindless filibusters to erupt on this floor over the next 14 months, and for that I am grateful," Frist said.

A likely candidate for the GOP's 2008 presidential nomination, Frist has been under enormous pressure from the White House and from social conservatives to push Bush's judges through. One of Frist's possible rivals, Arizona Sen. John McCain, helped pull the deal together.

The Senate clashed for almost four years over a small handful of conservative judges Bush is trying to appoint to powerful federal appeals courts, which get the last say in most cases because the Supreme Court hears very few.

By dragging out debate endlessly, or filibustering, nominations of judges they opposed, Democrats forced the GOP to round up 60 lawmakers to move to a final vote, even though confirmation only requires 51 votes. Republicans have 55 seats, so they can't break filibusters if Democrats stay united.

Frist had been planning a vote Tuesday on banning the filibuster of appeals court judges, a move dubbed "the nuclear option" because of its likely effect on the Senate. It was unclear Monday night whether he would have prevailed had the deal not been struck.

Now, the seven Republicans who signed the deal have committed to voting against the "nuclear option" unless they think Democrats are engaging in an unreasonable filibuster.

Under the agreement, the Senate will be able to move to final votes on Texas Judge Priscilla Owen, California Judge Janice Rogers Brown and Alabama Judge William Pryor. Filibusters against Michigan Judge Henry Saad and Idaho Judge William Myers will be allowed continue, effectively dooming their nominations.

And the agreement may mean Bush has to take Democratic objections into account when he picks future nominees for vacancies on the high court, in order to avoid choosing judges so controversial that Democrats consider themselves free to filibuster them.

Those who signed it said they hoped it would steer the Senate away from harsh fights in the future.

"In a Senate that has become increasingly partisan and polarized, the bipartisan center held," said Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut Democrat.

The agreement may be popular with the public. A USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll released Monday showed that more than half of respondents wanted the filibuster preserved as an option, though many also wanted the judges at the heart of the matter to get votes.

Solid majorities said leaders of both parties were acting more like "spoiled children" than "responsible adults," and Frist's personal approval ratings were low. Only 26% of the survey's respondents rated him favorably, compared with 24% who rated him unfavorably. About a third had never heard of him, and 18% had no opinion.
__________________
"Even a fool is thought to be wise if he is silent"
John Prophet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2005, 12:31 AM     #2 (permalink)
Instigator
 
Atomic Rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Healdsburg, CA
Posts: 12,257
Send a message via AIM to Atomic Rooster Send a message via Yahoo to Atomic Rooster
Damn week kneed moderate Republicans.
Atomic Rooster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2005, 12:49 AM     #3 (permalink)
Fact Checker
 
Gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: MSU- E. Lansing, MI
Posts: 6,253
More like power hungry greedy bastards =)
Gomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2005, 08:34 PM     #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Occupied Virginia
Posts: 395
Cooler heads prevail? The center strengthens? The good of the country trumps party line stupidity? A return to civility? The first step towards no longer having to hear idiotic Red state vs. Blue state commentary? . . . Or is Johnnycombat full of wishful thinking and borderline delusional?
johnnycombat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2005, 09:15 PM     #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 154
I think filibusting should be banned period. It's so stupid. Instead of talking about nonsense for 30+ hours, they should grow up and get some profanity removed work done. They get paid to do a job, and they hardly do it..

I think you should read the rules. No swearing.

-Whir, TechIMO Moderator
nooblet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2005, 09:55 PM     #6 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
osprey4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 8,729
Thankfully, our two NJ senators both voted NO!! I'm with them. Why compromse when you're on the verge of winning?
osprey4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2005, 11:07 AM     #7 (permalink)
Light to Counter the Dim
 
MTAtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Posts: 6,694
Send a message via AIM to MTAtech Send a message via Yahoo to MTAtech
Quote:
Originally Posted by osprey4
Thankfully, our two NJ senators both voted NO!! I'm with them. Why compromse when you're on the verge of winning?

Both sides could say that. The fact is, neither side was convinced they had the votes.
__________________
"The Bill of Rights is my Patriot Act."
MTAtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2005, 11:19 AM     #8 (permalink)
MR Meek and Mild
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: almost Virginia
Posts: 5,115
Blog Entries: 2
I hate the concept of filibustering. It seems to me to be generally un-democratic.

I should think that if something has the votes then it should become law, If not then you did not make your case and it should not become law.

Can anyone cite historical filibusters which resulted in what would for the most part be considered universally a good thing today.


If you think a candidate is too conservative then you should have to convince the majority of senators that he is too conservative otherwise let the vote rock on.

If you think a candidate is a criminal then you need to get out said info and convince the majority again.

If you think a law is too restrictive or too liberal then again you must convince the majority of the duely elected individuals in the senate of the above. the people elected the majority candidates to implement the majority changes. If those changes fall outside of what the people want then they should elect different candidates next time. filibuster gives veto power to the minority.
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2005, 12:20 PM     #9 (permalink)
Light to Counter the Dim
 
MTAtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Posts: 6,694
Send a message via AIM to MTAtech Send a message via Yahoo to MTAtech
The Senate by its nature is an undemocratic institution. In the Senate, Wyoming with 500,000 people, gets the same two Senators as California, with 25 - 30 million people.

Th Senate is not supposed to be the House of Reps II. It's supposed to be a deliberative body.
MTAtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2005, 06:31 PM     #10 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Occupied Virginia
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Epidemic
I hate the concept of filibustering. It seems to me to be generally un-democratic.

I should think that if something has the votes then it should become law, If not then you did not make your case and it should not become law.

Minorities must at time be protected from the majority. While absolute majority rule may sound democratic it is essentialy mob rule and in the end only a different form of tyranny.
johnnycombat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'Nuclear" Option now ticking in U.S. Senate Bill in SD, CA IMO Community 21 May 19th, 2005 07:04 PM
long delay after pressing "print" before option box pops up zskillz Technical Support 2 April 7th, 2005 07:16 PM
Iraqi Nuclear-Related Materials Have "Vanished" Mike IMO Community 3 October 11th, 2004 09:23 PM
PCChips M577 Motherboard help..are "keylock" or "turbo" connectors needed to boo John Prophet Motherboards 8 July 24th, 2002 05:43 PM
Free PC mags..no credit card needed..."PC" "CRN" etc John Prophet ResellerRatings Homepage Deals 1 May 18th, 2002 09:16 AM


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Most Active Discussions
Is It Just Me? (2809)
Is the PSU I received dead? (10)
California Passes Anti-Flat-HDTV Le.. (39)
Install XP pro and a Vista laptop ?.. (8)
A good PSU? (10)
HIS HD5770 graphic card question (14)
Foreign voltage (6)
New Computer wont recognize XP disc (7)
Dept. of HS: NSA 'Helped' Develop V.. (12)
Print spooler problem (6)
Ideal cheap graph card for PC-Gamin.. (15)
EVGA 9800 gtx help with finding a g.. (7)
Modern Warfare 2: Who Bought It? (60)
Mysterious Boot manager (9)
Recent Discussions
World's largest Monopoly Game using G.. (329)
EVGA 9800 gtx help with finding a goo.. (7)
Asus P4G8X Mobo (2)
Print spooler problem (6)
Need hard disk drivers (4)
windows 7 internet problem (4)
windows vista security holes (1)
What OS for a home server? (other tha.. (1)
Boot Problem? (0)
Logitech G9 laser gaming mouse $59.95.. (2)
$5 off any item with the purchase of .. (1)
Foreign voltage (6)
Ideal cheap graph card for PC-Gaming? (15)
HIS HD5770 graphic card question (14)
Install XP pro and a Vista laptop ?? (8)
Cloning old drive to new drive (6)
Amptron monitor G17FP-Black (0)
A good PSU? (10)
Is the PSU I received dead? (10)
HP Pavillion Laptop ze4220 won't turn.. (7)
Dept. of HS: NSA 'Helped' Develop Vis.. (12)
Convert 5 pin Keyboard to USB (11)
hybernate option (2)
Steam ID's, Gamertags etc... (1)
New Computer wont recognize XP disc (7)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM.
TechIMO Copyright 2009 All Enthusiast, Inc.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28