Can Inspectors find a hidden lab in a country? |
View Poll Results: Can 50 or 100 inspectors search a country and find weapons? | |
Yes our intellegence is good and we will find such labs the first day.
|   | 2 | 12.50% | |
Yes saddam is still stupid enough to leave evidence around
|   | 0 | 0% | |
No a task like this would be too large
|   | 11 | 68.75% | |
No there is no weapon stores
|   | 1 | 6.25% | |
Yes we will probably luck out.
|   | 2 | 12.50% |  | | |
November 12th, 2002, 02:35 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | MR Meek and Mild
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: almost Virginia
Posts: 5,115
| Can Inspectors find a hidden lab in a country?
Before Iraq invaded kuwait, Saddam owned a country. He did not need to hide his weapons of mass destruction. So the inspectors basically could find many weapon stores and labs.
During the last 12 years do you believe that saddam would leave his WOMD out in the open? Is he that stupid?
With that said. Could saddam hide a lab underground under a farmhouse? In said situation could a hundred inspectors locate such a facility?
Do you believe that if the inspectors find nothing that this proves anything except that saddam may have learned a lesson from before?
Or do you believe that we have some inside information and we will find the weapon stashes with out a problem if they exist? |
| |
November 12th, 2002, 02:45 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Anime Otaku
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Tampa, FL USA
Posts: 108,970
|
We didn't find any large stashes of WOMD them before, why now? Saddam knows how to play the game by now.
Robert Richmond
__________________ Robert Richmond | TechIMO Community Relations Director
Infinite perceptions. One reality. FanFiction.Net - Unleash your imagination. |
| |
November 12th, 2002, 02:58 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | |
If you see the details of the UN resolution, they are ludicurous. It states that Saddam hussain has to point out where the inspectors should go for inspection and that the Iraqi authorities should then facilitate the visit.
Right.
Like telling the Defence Attorneys to also prosecute, judge and sentence the perp.
Ep- you votted on the luck thing?
SH'll just send them here and there and find nothing. Kinda like a paid vacation for the inspector dudes. Though I'm not sure Iraq is at the top of my vacation destinations. | |
| |
November 12th, 2002, 03:15 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | MR Meek and Mild
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: almost Virginia
Posts: 5,115
|
The last time we were there with inspectors they found tons of chemical weapons AFAIK.
I also believe that they stumbled on the stashes that saddam did not wan them to inspect and that is when he became difficult about allowing access. During the weeks of stalling he would move and hide the stash.
I think we could luck out and stumble on the stashes. But I lean toward No it is too big a country to effectively search. Heck I bet I could hide a bilogical weapons facility in the back of a pharmacy in NYC and let the inspectors search for 10 years and they could not find it if I did not want them to. And manhattan is only 2 miles by 11 miles. |
| |
November 12th, 2002, 03:22 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | MR Meek and Mild
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: almost Virginia
Posts: 5,115
|
CM,
Come on you must have an opinion on this one. |
| |
November 12th, 2002, 03:25 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Anime Otaku
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Tampa, FL USA
Posts: 108,970
| found tons of chemical weapons
The search this time will be more concentric to nuclear and biological weapons as most chemical weapons offer no significant long-term impact beyond their immediate kill radius. |
| |
November 12th, 2002, 03:57 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: 30-41,000ft
Posts: 4,719
|
I think we have a pretty good idea where to look. We’ve had 10 years of time to gather intel and satellite images, and I’m sure we have operatives on the ground. Even when the UN inspectors were barred from the country it didn’t stop the need to continue the inspections by other means. Hope they use trained dogs in their inspections. Even residue lasts for months.  |
| |
November 12th, 2002, 04:11 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Trent University
Posts: 2,414
|
Chemicals aren't as difficult, nor expensive, to produce in relation to biological and nuclear weapons. I'd personally give up the weapons that were cheapest to produce ahead of other, much more costly, weapons.
Plus, biological and nuclear weapons can have a greater impact if used than chemicals do.
If they didn't find them last time, what's there to say that they will find them this time?
__________________
The difficulty is to try and teach the multitude that something can be true and untrue at the same time. -- Arthur Schopenhauer
|
| |
November 12th, 2002, 04:29 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: England
Posts: 598
|
Like I said in a previous similar post this inspection lark is ludicrous. These weapons and whatever can be hidden in caves, and all manner of places.
He'll probably 'let' the inspectors find one or two stashes of weapons and then say 'yes, that is all the weapons we have, lol'.
An impossible task even with the best intelligence. |
| |
November 12th, 2002, 04:39 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 883
| |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |