Pentagon Defends Use of Civilian Clothes  | | |
April 7th, 2003, 11:20 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Fossil
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: inside the Beltway
Posts: 6,421
| Pentagon Defends Use of Civilian Clothes |
| |
April 7th, 2003, 11:30 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 883
|
You don't see an important difference? *deleted* JExcel-
That was a bit uncalled for. No personal attacks.
daveleau |
| |
April 7th, 2003, 11:30 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Si vis pacem, para bellum
Join Date: Sep 1999 Location: KBAD-Bossier City LA
Posts: 7,606
|
Interesting. I have never heard of SO troops fighting in civies. My impression has been that they used the civies (civilian clothes) for intelligence gathering, which is different from what some others are currently doing. I have known many SO guys, but of course I am not in their circle on a "need to know" basis, so I don't know the whole story. I think their commanders are the only ones who know whether they fight in civies or not, at least until some sort of inquiry is made. |
| |
April 7th, 2003, 11:33 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 883
|
It wasn't a personal attack. Just an observation. |
| |
April 7th, 2003, 11:35 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Free Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Charleston, Illinois
Posts: 4,522
|
That was entirely uncalled for. Just because someone points out a discrepancy, it DOES NOT MEAN they are unpatriotic. Making sure the US government lives up to the standards it sets for others is patriotic, too.
EDIT: daveleau beat me to it.
__________________
You can't fix stupidity.
Last edited by M_Six : April 7th, 2003 at 11:59 AM.
|
| |
April 7th, 2003, 11:36 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | MR Meek and Mild
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: almost Virginia
Posts: 5,115
|
I believe that this is called spying. Not typically the same as risking civillian deaths to achive a military goal. Did you suspect that special ops was running in and out of baghdad with a big old flag on their back. |
| |
April 7th, 2003, 11:42 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Go back to sleep
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Switzerland
Posts: 7,385
| hehe sure do what you want nobody can stop you now 
what a fair war!!
Creatures
__________________ Canon EOS 450D | Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 IS | Canon EF-S 55-250mm 1:4-5.6 IS | Canon Speedlite 430EX II |
| |
April 7th, 2003, 11:44 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: edit - gone north
Posts: 218
|
__________________
Centurion - From Canada
Last edited by Centurion : April 16th, 2003 at 12:01 PM.
|
| |
April 7th, 2003, 11:45 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 883
| Quote: Originally posted by M_Six That was entirely uncalled for. Just because someone points out a discrepancy, it DOES NOT MEAN they are unpatriotic. Making sure the US government lives up to the standards it sets for others is patriotic, too. | I disagree. First, the discrepancy here is implied. Were the SO soldiers fighting in civilian clothes in order to draw the opposition into killing more civilians? Is that what is meant by "It's okay when we do it, of course..."? What these SO units are doing is an entirely different situation.
It's OK to point out discrepancies in our actions when they exist. It's not OK to make crap up. And I think it's unpatriotic to speek to only the negative things this country does. If it's so bad then move.
Last edited by J-Excel : April 7th, 2003 at 11:57 AM.
|
| |
April 7th, 2003, 11:46 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Si vis pacem, para bellum
Join Date: Sep 1999 Location: KBAD-Bossier City LA
Posts: 7,606
|
So, Creatures, you are sure that we are fighting in civies? This assumption seems a bit premature in regards to condeming our SO forces and the war effort. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |