Thread: software firewall for linux?
-
December 29th, 2004, 10:36 PM #1
software firewall for linux?
I'm using rh9 and I was wondering if there is a default firewall (akin to zone alarm) that I could enable on my machine?
if not what do you all recommend??
thx
-Z
-
December 29th, 2004, 10:47 PM #2
Shorewall is what comes installed with mandrake, not sure about others.
-
December 29th, 2004, 10:58 PM #3
This is this firewall software package called m0n0wall I don't know much of it; all I know is its a boot-cd FreeBSD firewall. We call it "firewall boxes".
-
December 29th, 2004, 11:30 PM #4
GuardDog comes with MEPIS, which is Debian.
-
December 29th, 2004, 11:45 PM #5
my system comes with firestarter, which is gui-bassed and simple 2 use. highly recommended
my signature was so lame i deleted it.
-
December 30th, 2004, 02:10 AM #6
iptables is built in to the new kernels. Mostly linux firewalls are actually firewall configuration packages. BTW this IS worthwhile, you do not want to be doing the iptables config yourself. You will leave holes. Monmotha's (google it) is another.
-
December 30th, 2004, 02:12 AM #7
James is on the right track. You want an IPTables script/tool.
IPTables is the Linux equivilent of Zone Alarm.
Another to look at is APF. Advanced Policy Firewall. It is real nice.My computer is bigger than yours!
-
December 30th, 2004, 05:03 AM #8
I second the 'Firestarter' suggestion www.fs-security.com/
-
December 30th, 2004, 05:06 AM #9
I notice its the "firewall for gnome"
Does this mean it cant run in KDE? Or just that it needs gnome libraries installed to run?
-
December 30th, 2004, 05:35 AM #10
[rant]
You know, the thing that I dislike about this package is the marketing BS.
Originally Posted by CMonster
It's a glorified iptables config tool. Downloaded it ... in the readme is: -
Also in the readme is: -Code:Firestarter is a complete firewalling tool for Linux.
What peeves me off about this is that Firestarter is NOT a complete firewalling tool. Take away iptables and you have a useless pretty script. Now if they claimed that Firestarter was an excellent user level firewall configuration tool, which it may be, I'd be happy. But when they can't honestly describe the package ... use something else!Code:Requirements ============ A machine running Linux kernel version 2.4 or 2.6 with Linux IP Firewalling Tables (iptables) version 1.2.3 or higher Gnome 2.6
[/rant]
-
December 30th, 2004, 05:43 AM #11
I totally agree - it is just a config tool for iptables but it is one of the easy ones
-
December 30th, 2004, 01:52 PM #12
-
December 30th, 2004, 01:56 PM #13
-
December 30th, 2004, 03:04 PM #14This is true of almost any Linux "firewall" they are all just different ways of setting up IP Tables.
Originally Posted by James T
My computer is bigger than yours!
-
December 31st, 2004, 10:55 AM #15
If you have a old computer laying around, a 500 meg hardrive, use Smoothwall.
I have used it for years. The software is easy to set up. The old box wont need
a monitor, keyboard or mouse (if your old bios will allow removal with alarming), and can be controlled by the browser. If you want to use just the one box, then
there's lots of good answers in the prev posts.
Always tell the truth, because it's impossible to remember who you told what lie to.
-
December 31st, 2004, 03:47 PM #16Its good stuff
Originally Posted by computerwizz
I had used firestarter and then guarddog. Firestarter wasn't configurable enough for me so I tried guarddog. That was ok but the interface sucked and it wouldn't allow broadcast packets from my own lan no matter what I did.
Shorewall (or shoreline as they're calling it on parts of their site) has no gui. The rules file was easy to set up and there are a lot of different options. You can find out more on their site: http://www.shorewall.net/
-
December 31st, 2004, 03:49 PM #17
Rather than smoothwall, look at ipcop. It is a fork of smoothwall. The main developers at smoothwall turned into jerks, so some of the other developers made ipcop.
My computer is bigger than yours!
-
December 31st, 2004, 08:29 PM #18O but so much better
Originally Posted by Siliconjunkie

I loved using IPTables when I had my IPCop machine. So powerful!
Ain't that the truth.
Originally Posted by Siliconjunkie
-Chris
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Using a spare PC as a router?
By deisler in forum Networking and InternetReplies: 3Last Post: November 21st, 2004, 10:28 PM -
Software firewall help
By GroundZero3 in forum Networking and InternetReplies: 4Last Post: January 12th, 2004, 01:07 PM -
AntiVirus for Linux?
By StealthyV in forum Linux and UnixReplies: 5Last Post: October 27th, 2003, 03:58 PM -
High-Speed Newbie Needs Help!
By scourge in forum Networking and InternetReplies: 11Last Post: September 18th, 2002, 08:51 PM -
dude, your getting DSL...
By edwelly in forum Networking and InternetReplies: 10Last Post: June 5th, 2002, 06:48 PM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote


at least you have some space between them so the primary card has some air flow to it. 75-80C is about average for temps on those, my 560 Ti's do about the same in a lot of games, some games run...
Temps too high? ( GTX 580s )