3Com OfficeConnect vs HP ProCurve switch  | |
October 1st, 2004, 08:46 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | I'm silently judging you
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Lincoln City, OR
Posts: 5,379
| 3Com OfficeConnect vs HP ProCurve switch |
| |
October 1st, 2004, 09:26 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Fur ballin
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 4,371
|
Either or.... nothing to exciting about either of those switches but will do fine if you have only a handfull of clients on the switch.
If price is no object get a layer 2 switch like a Cisco 2950 (cost more though)...
Personaly.. I would stay away from switches that have been refurb'd. Who knows what the problem was in the first place. Buy a new one out of the box with at least a year warrenty.
Last edited by Sixpac_XP : October 1st, 2004 at 09:29 PM.
|
| |
October 1st, 2004, 09:27 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,821
|
they look pretty much identical
usually a switch is a switch is a switch etc
neither of them are "managed" switches...so they are probably going to work almost identically
__________________
"Even a fool is thought to be wise if he is silent"
|
| |
October 2nd, 2004, 12:08 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | I'm silently judging you
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Lincoln City, OR
Posts: 5,379
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Sixpac_XP Either or.... nothing to exciting about either of those switches but will do fine if you have only a handfull of clients on the switch.
If price is no object get a layer 2 switch like a Cisco 2950 (cost more though)...
Personaly.. I would stay away from switches that have been refurb'd. Who knows what the problem was in the first place. Buy a new one out of the box with at least a year warrenty. | That was my original concern with the HP. Looks like I'll go with the 3Com then. |
| |
October 5th, 2004, 11:24 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,044
|
I have done work with several different porcurve switches, all managed switches though, and love them. They are great and easy to setup. I would worry about the refurb though, if they were both new i'd go with the procurve. IMO.
__________________
BSOD.........
The reason why I'll be drunk tonight. Are you a winner? |
| |
October 6th, 2004, 01:13 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | I'm silently judging you
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Lincoln City, OR
Posts: 5,379
| |
| |
October 6th, 2004, 01:24 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Did you try Google yet?
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 3,468
|
Betcha $5 that a $15 linksys from walmart would serve you just as well. Unless you just have money burning a hole in your poket.....
700meg is not a particularly large transfer, and the switch really doesnt care.
The big thing that you get when you pay for in L2 switches is wirespeed backplanes, meaning that you can move data at a full 100Mb from all ports at the same time. A cheap 4 port switch may only be able to do 150Mb total at one time instead of 200Mb. So, unless you have many clients on one switch that are going to be near 100% utilization regularly and at the same time as others, there will be no net gain.
__________________
My computer is bigger than yours!
|
| |
October 6th, 2004, 02:02 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | I'm silently judging you
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Lincoln City, OR
Posts: 5,379
|
Well I won't buy a Linksys for one thing, and two....
One of the main reasons I got it was for LAN potties. Usually when we get together there is the usual cool-file-swapping routine where everyone is throwing around cool stuff (patches, vidz, etc), and with the 200mbps total per-port on the 3Com versus the setup like you mentioned above, I figured it should help. No saying how much the 802.11p scheduling will improve performance since usually when I'm streaming something there isn't much going on in the background.
It's just nice to have the extra headroom in case we needed it. Oh, and there's the whole thing where it's got 8 ports versus the 4 on my router, and 5 on my switch (not sure of the status on that one, it was acting up a bit). I'm also building another PC with a Celeron 1.7 (no laughing) so that would need to go somewhere. |
| |
October 9th, 2004, 12:07 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Did you try Google yet?
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 3,468
| Quote: |
200mbps total per-port on the 3Com versus the setup like you mentioned above
| Both are 100mb full duplex. No magic in the 3Com. Quote: |
No saying how much the 802.11p scheduling will improve performance since usually when I'm streaming something there isn't much going on in the background.
| It won't. The likelyhood that you can saturate a 100meg network at a LAN party is slim, particularly if switched. Quote: |
Oh, and there's the whole thing where it's got 8 ports versus the 4 on my router, and 5 on my switch (not sure of the status on that one, it was acting up a bit).
| You do realize that you don't have to go overboard to get 8 ports? EVERYBODY makes an 8 port switch.
I understand that it's cool and all to have nice equipment, and I am nobody to tell you how to spend your money, but it sure sounds like you are justifying it to yourself. |
| |
October 10th, 2004, 01:41 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | I'm silently judging you
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Lincoln City, OR
Posts: 5,379
|
OK well...update. The switch is here and has since replaced my router which was acting up a lot. (crashing the connection mainly, a lot), so I ordered a D-Link DI-604 router.
Um, thank you for all the help....? It works wonderfully, no crashes or anything, and the construction/packaging inspires confidence.
Was it overkill? Maybe, but some people ask me why I don't have problems with my equipment versus theirs. It's because I go for quality, even if it's expensive. I need something that will last, and that was one of my first concerns, NOT speed. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |