-
June 4th, 2002, 09:23 AM #1
Some one Help, Terminal Services!
When I connect to my Terminal Server through my Workstation, using either the Terminal Services Client or Remote Desktop, I'm limited to 256 Color, using the display option in Remote Desktop with more colors (True Color 24 bit), I know it's not from the Workstations End, It's The Server!
Now to the Point!
How can I set the Server to enable Higher Resulotion?
Terminal Server: Windows 2000 Server
___/Snaggle\___
___/Snaggle\___;)
-
June 4th, 2002, 09:57 AM #2
I have not seen that before. Is the server console set higher than 256 colors and 640x480? If not, that may be the problem.
-
June 4th, 2002, 10:04 AM #3Nither have I, Yes, It's 32 Bit Colour 1152 X 864Originally posted by DVNT1
I have not seen that before. Is the server console set higher than 256 colors and 640x480?
___/Snaggle\______/Snaggle\___;)
-
June 4th, 2002, 10:47 AM #4
-
June 4th, 2002, 04:38 PM #5
Sorry, 256 is the best it will do.
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q186466You can't fix stupidity.
-
June 4th, 2002, 04:56 PM #6
That explains the 256 colors well, but not the resolution.
Ooops, I was thinking a 640x480 resolution was the problem.How can I set the Server to enable Higher Resulotion?
snaggle, is there a problem with resolution too?
-
June 4th, 2002, 05:05 PM #7
No sorry I didn't mean that!
The Colors only!
M_Six, But that only Applies to Windows NT 4 Terminal Server
I have had it work before at full color!
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;Q278502#Task2
This is what I checked out earlier and I did what it said
Click Start , click Run , and then type MMC .
Click the Console menu, click Add/Remove Snap-in , and then click Add . Select Group Policy .
Click Add , make certain that Local Computer is selected in the Group Policy Object box, click Finish , and then click Close .
Select Computer Configuration , click Administrative Templates , and then click Terminal Services .
Select Limit Maximum Color Depth and set it to the color depth that you want.
But still for some reason it doesn't work!
___/Snaggle\___Last edited by snaggle; June 4th, 2002 at 05:08 PM.
___/Snaggle\___;)
-
June 4th, 2002, 05:13 PM #8
snaggle, are you are obviously not using NT40 as the TS host, does this mean it is XP?
-
June 4th, 2002, 05:17 PM #9
Well this is confusing. This article says Win2K Terminal Server is limited to 256 colors also, but the article snaggle posted would lead you to believe otherwise. Typical MS.
You can't fix stupidity.
-
June 4th, 2002, 05:17 PM #10Not Really a Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 27,856
What happened to Windows 2000 in there DVNT?
We use Win2k TS servers quite a bit
Helicopters don't fly; they vibrate so much and make so much noise that the earth rejects them.
-
June 4th, 2002, 05:18 PM #11His linked KB article was specifically for XP.Originally posted by vass0922
What happened to Windows 2000 in there DVNT?
We use Win2k TS servers quite a bit

I only use W2k TS servers too.
-
June 4th, 2002, 06:12 PM #12
The Article that a Posted is for Setting both ends Server and Workstations to enable higher screen resolution to Greater depth Than 256 Colors.
It discribes how to set both a Windows XP Client Using Remote Desktop and a Windows 2000 Terminal Server to enable higher than 256 color resolution.
I'm Using Windows 2000 Server on my Server
and my Workstation is running Windows XP Pro!
So it's not me, it's you guys not reading the hole of the article!
___/Snaggle\___
___/Snaggle\___;)
-
June 4th, 2002, 06:46 PM #13
256 colours is all the remote desktop protocol supports in windows 2000. XP has a newer version which allows higher colour; that's why your desktop client implies up to 32 bit colour. With the next MS server OS (.Net)and windows XP pro, you can use high colour. On win2k, you get to live with 256 in all it's glory. You'll get used to it, though, I manage all my servers via the terminal, and don't even notice anymore.
-
June 4th, 2002, 07:01 PM #14
Thanks shigum, DVNT1, M_Six for your help!
___/Snaggle\______/Snaggle\___;)
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote

THAT's NOT an answer to my question. Whether you answer or not, The FACT that she had no easy EFFECTIVE method of defense IS the main reason she was raped. Yes, there were other factors like the...
Do YOU think having a gun would...