November 30th, 2008, 08:45 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Performance Whore
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: ~/
Posts: 8,613
|
There is alot of trashing Vista going around. And 98% of it is complete BS.
Vista is a decent OS. It had problems when it first came out, but they are very few and far between now. If you get 4gigs of RAM, then your fine running Vista.
If your a gamer, Vista is worth it that much more for DX10. |
| |
November 30th, 2008, 08:48 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Instigator
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Healdsburg, CA
Posts: 10,796
|
__________________
Chappaquiddick 1 - Dick Cheney 0
|
| |
November 30th, 2008, 08:59 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 163
|
Vista is a good system if you have 2gigs of ram and 64mb (or higher) video anything lower and it might be slower than xp when trying to run some programs. |
| |
November 30th, 2008, 09:11 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomic Rooster | Yeah I'm checking it out now. Freaking expensive though, $900 just for an Intel Quad Core CPU.
I wish I lived in America.  |
| |
November 30th, 2008, 09:13 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 163
| |
| |
November 30th, 2008, 09:19 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Instigator
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Healdsburg, CA
Posts: 10,796
| Quote:
Originally Posted by cksboy15 intel has cheaper quads | Yes they do. But finding one cheap in Australia is a whole other story.
The cheapest one at that site is $313.50: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Last edited by Atomic Rooster : November 30th, 2008 at 09:21 PM.
|
| |
November 30th, 2008, 09:57 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Performance Whore
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: ~/
Posts: 8,613
|
And that Quad is worthless IMO.
Maybe your best checking into a E7200/E8400/E8500? |
| |
December 2nd, 2008, 01:39 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 426
| Quote:
Originally Posted by KarmaKiller There is alot of trashing Vista going around. And 98% of it is complete BS.
Vista is a decent OS. It had problems when it first came out, but they are very few and far between now. If you get 4gigs of RAM, then your fine running Vista.
If your a gamer, Vista is worth it that much more for DX10. | Not to mention that a lot of new games are centered around vista like halo 2 
__________________
Desktop- Intel Pentium DC Wolfdale E5200 @ 3.3ghz (333x10); 2Gb DDR 2 800+(OC); Vista HP
Laptop- Intel Core 2 Duo (Memron) T5200 @ 1.6ghz; 3Gb DDR 2 533; nVidia GeForce Go 7600; Vista HP
|
| |
December 2nd, 2008, 02:47 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 68
|
Vista is like XP in some ways, it's just over the years people forgot. When XP came out, most people were still running Win98SE (because ME was terrible). XP took much more horsepower to run, and therefore it took a bit of time until it ran everything as fast as Win98. Vista is similar, however now hardware has caught up with the OS.
One reason Vista is great is because you can overclock your video card too much, and if the display freezes, you see a black screen for 5 sec then the card reboots and everything continues as normal. XP would require a hard reboot. Also, in my experience, Vista x64 is just hands down superior to x32 stability wise, and running x64 more or less requires you have 4GB+ of ram installed. Moving from 4->6gb lets you turn off your pagefile which makes everything scream after an initial load.
Budget constrained a 4850 + Q6600 is hard to beat as a video/CPU combo, however if you are an nvidia fan the 9800GTX+ is still very nice for the price. |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |