+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    just passin thru Sweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    SW, OHIO
    Posts
    5,850

    Question which is better 512 (dual channel) / 768 single channel?

     
    As stated above, which would benefit my system more? Running the 512 (dual channel) or 768 single channel? System specs. below.

    Thanks,
    Sweeper

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    430
    you know, i am wondering the same thing, but my guess with about 90% sure would be 768 dual channel.

  3. #3
    just passin thru Sweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    SW, OHIO
    Posts
    5,850
    Well on my MB that's not an option. The MB has for slots for up to 4GB of memory. But, to run in dual channel of course you have to have slot 1/3 or 2/4. Now if I have slot 1/3 and fill either slot 2/4 with just a single stick it will run in Single Channel rather than Dual Channel. This is my dilemma. I am doing some trading and was going to trade one stick, but if keeping 768 single channel will be taking a step back wards rather than keeping 512 (DUAL CHANNEL) then I want to stick with the 512.

    Anyone else?

  4. #4
    Ultimate Member _Switch_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    1,213
    well, ur 512 would run in dual channel, cuz it'd be in slot 1/3, but ur other 256 which is in 2 or 4 would run in single......so you could always see if u can get a matched pair for the lonely 256 later on

  5. #5
    just passin thru Sweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    SW, OHIO
    Posts
    5,850
    Actually they all three would run in single channel because the of the MB design. If I left the 512 in there in slots 1/3 it would post as Dual Channel, but if I add the single stick in 2/4 they all post as Single Channel. Odd I know...........

  6. #6
    What? SoloCamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Burning in Florida
    Posts
    15,195
    Blog Entries
    4
    It really depends in this case. If you are running your 2.4 @ 3.2 you are creating a lot of bandwidth as long as your memory is running 1:1 with it..

    So if that is the case, I think the extra bandwidth created by D/C would have already been available anyways by your overclock, if you ran single channel.

    I would go with more ram in this case, but then again, it depends on what you do with the comp? Some game's such as BF2 love more ram, and you need atleast 1.5gb to really run it smooth maxed out..

    Maybe try running the aquamark3 benchmark, or even 3dmark2001 because the score is reflected largely on timings, ram bandwidth, cpu speed.. not just mainly the gfx card like 3dmark 03, and 05.
    Main PC: AMD FX-8350 / 16gb DDR3 1600 / AMD 7970GE 1200mhz Core & 1600mhz Mem / Win7 Pro 64bit
    File Server: AMD Opteron 180 / 3gb DDR400 / Nvidia 6200 / WinXP Home 32bit / Lubuntu 12.10
    Laptop: HP-Compaq nc8430/ Intel CoreDuo T2400 / 2gb DDR2 667/ Ati x1600 / WinXP Pro 32bit

  7. #7
    just passin thru Sweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    SW, OHIO
    Posts
    5,850
    Well I have 1 Gig in there now but I am doing some trading so one stick of 256MB will be gone. So that will leave me with 768MB of DDR400 @ 427Mhz. So I am wondering if I should just go with the 512 Dual Channel @ 427Mhz ? ? ?

  8. #8
    I got this #43 fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    5,560
    I believe you would benefit more from the 768 vs. the 512.

  9. #9
    Ultimate Member JLK03F150's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    5,415
    Like Solo suggested, try running 3dMark01SE, PCMark04, and Aquamark3 with 512DC then 768SC. See which gives you better scores. Also try the HL2 benchmark if you have/play the game.
    Last edited by JLK03F150; January 2nd, 2006 at 05:22 PM.
    What computer do you have? And please don't say a white one. - Sheldon Cooper

  10. #10
    just passin thru Sweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    SW, OHIO
    Posts
    5,850
    Guess this will be a project for me... I'll report the test results.

  11. #11
    Ultimate Member NightRise420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    1,577
    512mb dual channel did better on benchmakrs for me than 768 single....but i benefitted more through 768 single channel =)
    Live Fast, Die Young, Dont Forget, Dont Regret

  12. #12
    just passin thru Sweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    SW, OHIO
    Posts
    5,850
    Benchmark "Sandra"

    512MB @ 427Mhz Dual Channel: 5399/5407

    768MB @ 427Mhz Single Channel: 3103/3106

  13. #13
    Senior Member beastgreeley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    572
    Quote Originally Posted by Sweeper
    Benchmark "Sandra"

    512MB @ 427Mhz Dual Channel: 5399/5407

    768MB @ 427Mhz Single Channel: 3103/3106
    Which means what to framerates in games?
    Old Cranky and hard of hearing
    I-5, 3450 socket 1155, 16gb 1066ram corsair vengance
    PNY GeForce GTX 670

  14. #14
    Not Really a Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    27,856
    Quote Originally Posted by beastgreeley
    Which means what to framerates in games?
    dual channel is your friend

  15. #15
    What? SoloCamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Burning in Florida
    Posts
    15,195
    Blog Entries
    4
    Well I would have to agree with beast here, that test was just testing memory bandwidth, which is not the deciding factor always.

    In fact let me give you a link to a single channel vs dual channel benchmarks on various games. Half life 2 was the one that single channel lost out in, bad.


    doom 3: http://www.tcmagazine.info/articles....e=1&pagenum=10

    half life 2: http://www.tcmagazine.info/articles....e=1&pagenum=11

    verdict: http://www.tcmagazine.info/articles....e=1&pagenum=13

    It really depends here though, some games would like more bandwidth, BUT added memory helps a lot aswell. I think the only way to truly find out is to run the games you like to play, because I have a feeling that they are going to perform pretty neck and neck, unless bandwidth is a big issue in the game.
    Main PC: AMD FX-8350 / 16gb DDR3 1600 / AMD 7970GE 1200mhz Core & 1600mhz Mem / Win7 Pro 64bit
    File Server: AMD Opteron 180 / 3gb DDR400 / Nvidia 6200 / WinXP Home 32bit / Lubuntu 12.10
    Laptop: HP-Compaq nc8430/ Intel CoreDuo T2400 / 2gb DDR2 667/ Ati x1600 / WinXP Pro 32bit

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    830
    I can say this right now, Dual Channel (in theory) is supposed to be better than Single Channel. Has nothing to do with the "MHz" the ram runs at, has to do with the RAM interface with the processor and front side bus. When running single channel yer only getting a 64-Bit Memory to FSB & CPU connection. When running Dual Channel yer getting a 128-Bit Memory to FSB & CPU connection.

    I have no idea what exactly the difference is... but if it's anything like the difference between a 64-Bit Memory interface on a graphics card and a 128-Bit Memory interface on a graphics card, it's worth the difference.

    I've noticed that some ram won't even run in single channel that's made for dual channel, so I think it's always best to either just buy a dual kit or buy two sticks individually of the same ram. And if yer lookin' to gaming and such at all, you really should get more ram like the others have said.

  17. #17
    Ultimate Member HeadBand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,990
    those sandra benchmarks represent only memory bandwidth of the memory, real world benchmarks are nowhere near this different

    to tell what would benifit more you will need to use real world situations...using older programs like aquamark and 3dm01 won't help much eaither, sure you could see a bit of benifit from dual channel but they use no where near the ammount of RAM that todays applications use and they would probobally show a much greater improvement from the lack of paging
    Hey who turned sigs on?

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    830
    Yes, I agree. If I were you I'd try running games and applications that're newer and taxing on the system, and see which seems to run better.

  19. #19
    just passin thru Sweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    SW, OHIO
    Posts
    5,850
    My score on Aquamark was 1000 points less also. :/

  20. #20
    What? SoloCamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Burning in Florida
    Posts
    15,195
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Sweeper
    My score on Aquamark was 1000 points less also. :/
    without dual channel?

    I still honestly think the only way you are going to get truly accurate results for today's games, is well, to play them and run fraps.

    I noticed no point increase going from 512mb of ram to 1gb in aqmrk3
    Main PC: AMD FX-8350 / 16gb DDR3 1600 / AMD 7970GE 1200mhz Core & 1600mhz Mem / Win7 Pro 64bit
    File Server: AMD Opteron 180 / 3gb DDR400 / Nvidia 6200 / WinXP Home 32bit / Lubuntu 12.10
    Laptop: HP-Compaq nc8430/ Intel CoreDuo T2400 / 2gb DDR2 667/ Ati x1600 / WinXP Pro 32bit

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 400mhz dual channel setup running at 320 mhz dual channel.
    By s4087046 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: November 30th, 2008, 11:34 PM
  2. dual channel memory vs single channel memory?
    By optinox in forum Motherboards
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: May 19th, 2008, 05:11 AM
  3. Dual channe v. single channel memory
    By DoctorReno in forum Processors, Memory, and Overclocking
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: December 12th, 2005, 10:44 PM
  4. dual channel RAM or single?
    By thelonegunman in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: May 11th, 2005, 12:48 PM
  5. ? on Dual Channel memory vs single on my A7N8X deluxe
    By rcoplien in forum Technical Support
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: October 14th, 2003, 06:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Recommended Sites: ResellerRatings Store Reviews