home hardware prices news articles forums photos user reviews
Go Back   Tech Support Forums - TechIMO.com > PC Hardware and Tech > Processors, Memory, and Overclocking
Join TechIMO for Free!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Topic: So i'm getting ready to build my next computer but it has been four or five years since i built this one and frankly, I am getting confused with all the new processors Intel has released. I see specs for the processors an...
Reply Get bargains at  »  Dealighted.com
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Currently Active Users: 1427
Discussions: 184,690, Posts: 2,205,378, Members: 227,399
Old May 16th, 2008, 08:54 PM   Digg it!   #1 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
nemowolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,095
Differences in Intel Cores

So i'm getting ready to build my next computer but it has been four or five years since i built this one and frankly, I am getting confused with all the new processors Intel has released. I see specs for the processors and I wonder if having a 45nm vs 65 nm is really a big difference?

This is going to go in a shuttle barebones box most likely so i guess thermally speaking i need something that is efficient and cool without needing a huge heat sink. I have no plans to OC this either.

These are the two i was looking at just recently. Im wondering if the slightly lower CPU speed is going to be made up for in FSB and the extra meg of L2 cache?

I saw they just released this one:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115052

E7200 Wolfdale 2.53GHz
L2 Cach 3MB
FSB 1066MHz
Manufacturing Tech 45 nm

For 131

Or this one:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115045

E4700 2.6GHz Allendale
FSB 800MHz
L2 Cache 2MB
Manufacturing Tech 65 nm

For 139
__________________
http://nemoscity.myminicity.com
Defender of Geek Squad!

nemowolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2008, 09:15 PM     #2 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
2monsters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,735
Send a message via ICQ to 2monsters Send a message via Skype™ to 2monsters
If your not going to oc, and considering your going with a shuttle for a case. I would go with the 7200, less power consumption, higher fsb, and more cache, and cheaper.
__________________
Crunching For The Cure! Techimo Folding Team# 111 http://folding.stanford.edu/

2monsters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2008, 09:19 PM     #3 (permalink)
I eat Mhz.
 
KarmaKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Folding@Home
Posts: 7,272
Blog Entries: 5
Send a message via MSN to KarmaKiller Send a message via Yahoo to KarmaKiller
Diito^
45nm cores use less power, which = less heat.
And they are faster clock for clock then 65nm cores.
__________________
-Folding@Home FAQ's-

Q6600@4.0Ghz|9800GTX|2Gb@900Mhz|EVGA 680i|Custom H20 cooling

KarmaKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2008, 09:20 PM     #4 (permalink)
SoMuchAnime-SoLittleTime
 
EXreaction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Plymouth, WI
Posts: 13,570
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via ICQ to EXreaction Send a message via AIM to EXreaction Send a message via MSN to EXreaction Send a message via Yahoo to EXreaction
Definitely go with the new 45nm. I don't know what the exact difference will be, but I know going from 2 to 4MB caches on the old 65nm cores was an average of 10% performance increase.
__________________
The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one.
EXreaction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2008, 10:43 PM     #5 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
MTAtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Posts: 4,288
Send a message via AIM to MTAtech Send a message via Yahoo to MTAtech
I think you should change your mind about OC but that's me.
__________________
There comes a time when one must take a position that's not safe nor politic nor popular but must do it because conscience tells him it is right"-MLK
MTAtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2008, 10:49 PM     #6 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,151
Send a message via AIM to RamonGTP Send a message via Yahoo to RamonGTP
E7200 are suppose to be pretty nice. OC nicely too, if you ever did decide to do it.

If you KNOW you won't OC, i'd go with an E8400
__________________
"Opinions not based on knowledge are ugly things"
RamonGTP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2008, 11:46 PM     #7 (permalink)
ATI 4850 FTW!
 
#43 fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 5,210
Send a message via AIM to #43 fan
I'd go for the 7200, for the less Power that is consumed.
Not to mention it will be far easier to cool.
__________________
http://www.ubuntu.com
#43 fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 20th, 2008, 01:59 PM     #8 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
nemowolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by RamonGTP View Post
E7200 are suppose to be pretty nice. OC nicely too, if you ever did decide to do it.

If you KNOW you won't OC, i'd go with an E8400
I did alot of reading since my post. Now i really dont know what i want to do. The E7200 is looking good for a budget but for another 70 bucks i can get the E8400. I guess im gonna have to see how much money i have to play with. Atleast the video card is already bought so i dont have to worry about that.

As for OC'ing ive never been a fan because ive never needed to reach a peak perfomance. Im playing AoC right now with under 10fps so if i can bump it upto 30 i would be happy. Anything more then that and its just overkill to me.
nemowolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 20th, 2008, 02:09 PM     #9 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
MTAtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Posts: 4,288
Send a message via AIM to MTAtech Send a message via Yahoo to MTAtech
I OC a E2180 to 2.7. For $80, can't go wrong.
MTAtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about cores. tmasboa General Tech Discussion 3 July 18th, 2005 11:38 AM
what are the differences of the Intel D865PERL MBs? ShyD33 Motherboards 2 July 17th, 2005 11:58 PM
Dual Cores lablkilz699 General Tech Discussion 5 June 7th, 2005 04:22 PM
Cores TheFuch Processors, Memory, and Overclocking 6 February 21st, 2005 01:27 AM
after crushing 2 cores.... Bullion Processors, Memory, and Overclocking 27 December 20th, 2002 06:37 PM

Most Active Discussions
Is It Just Me? (13813)
Weirdest case ever... (10)
Farrakhan on Obama: 'The Messiah is.. (10)
Custom external storage build, need.. (8)
so u cant crossfire with a HD 4850 .. (9)
John McFlIpFlOpPeR - for Bingo =) (50)
Building my first desktop (9)
NOOB VB.Net questions (5)
Graphics Card for COD 4 (5)
Recent Discussions
wholesale cheap discount nike j.. (0)
wholesale cheap discount nike j.. (0)
6TB+ RAID solution? (5)
RAID 5 Configuration (2)
dvd portable player (4)
*********** /company of heroes.. (0)
*********** /need for speed un.. (0)
***********/NWN 2 cd key (0)
Unable to start the Bluetooth s.. (1)
Custom external storage build, .. (8)
Drive won't partition? (3)
FS: Kung Fu Panda (DS) & MG.. (0)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 AM.
TechIMO Copyright 2008 All Enthusiast, Inc.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28