Underclock?  | |
October 23rd, 2002, 01:22 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Colorado
Posts: 41
| Underclock?
I've got a Celery 900 FCPGA and a Soyo MB that'll support up to an 800. Other than not getting all the bang out of the cpu possible, are there any obvious problems 'underclocking' this?
*edit*
MB is a Soyo 7VCA-E Socket 370 that'll take a PIII at 933 w/100fsb or a Celery w/66fsb. Do I risk something unforseen popping in my Celery and cranking to the 100fsb?
Last edited by Marunad : October 23rd, 2002 at 01:28 AM.
|
| |
October 23rd, 2002, 01:35 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | OH NO!
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Monett Missouri
Posts: 4,300
|
HMM! I'm running two socket7 boards that only support 233mhz CPUS, but I'm running k6/2 450s in both @400mhz, haven't had a problem yet, other than initial jumper configs and things like that.
I'd say you'll be alright.
I'd wait on someone with more experiance in this area before ya toss it in there though 
__________________
The impossible takes more time,and costs more money.
|
| |
October 23rd, 2002, 01:49 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Real gangstas sip on Yacc
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Suckas-ville
Posts: 4,553
|
Hardware wise there should be no problem.
As long as they are the same pins (ie... Socket 7 to Socket 7), the motherboard could care less who is in there.
It may have a problem auto-detecting the chip, but nothing a few jumpers won't fix.
The chip also will not car ethat it is running "slow". All it cares about is doing its job every time the clock hits it
Jkrohn
__________________
Signatures blow hard
If your signature contains an ad of any kind, congratulations, you're on my ignore list.
|
| |
October 23rd, 2002, 01:52 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Banned by everybody
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,052
|
I hope that it'll see it as a 900 for ya, cause we're talking Intel here.
It's not like you can just rejumper so it'll run 800.
Those babies are multiplier locked remember?? |
| |
October 23rd, 2002, 02:00 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Real gangstas sip on Yacc
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Suckas-ville
Posts: 4,553
|
Yeah, tis true.
What model is the mobo? You have to use the 9X multiplier, so hopefully your mobo supports it  Though wouldn't it still run at 8X100? The processor shouldn't care.
Jkrohn |
| |
October 23rd, 2002, 02:03 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,705
|
I'm with ultima.... with the CPU being multiplyer locked, so i'm thinking it should work at full speed.....
JayMan |
| |
October 23rd, 2002, 02:28 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Real gangstas sip on Yacc
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Suckas-ville
Posts: 4,553
|
Hmm, it should work.
As long as the mobo hits it at 100MHz, it should do 9x the calculations. Processor isn't going to care.
I'm just wondering if not supporting a 9x multiplier might cause some issues anyway.
Best case, reports speed as 800, runs like 900.
Worst case it doesn't boot.
Jkrohn |
| |
October 23rd, 2002, 08:28 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Colorado
Posts: 41
|
Thanks for all the responses! The MB in question is a Soyo 7VCA-E Socket 370/VIA/ATA100/ATX. At $36 and change each on KnowledgeMicro it was irresistable as backbone for rebuilding some old boxes for office use. |
| |
November 9th, 2002, 11:59 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Colorado
Posts: 41
|
Works smooth as silk and rock stable... This little workhorse should be crunching our documents for years to come at pennies, thanks for the input all  |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |