Surface area of heatsink = Performance?  | | |
December 6th, 2001, 12:43 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Bloomingdale IL
Posts: 1,669
| Surface area of heatsink = Performance?
Today in science class we were talking about surface area of rocks and i was thinking that the more surface area the more air can touch the metal. Do you think that surface area effects the performance? |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 12:46 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | The Mad Redhatter
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: NJ
Posts: 3,552
|
i'm not sure how you mean. basically, the more surface area of a chip you expose to the heatsink, the more heat can be drawn off, not the other way around. a good heatsink should make even contact with the entier chip to ensure maximum cooling. |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 12:46 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Tokyo-Japan
Posts: 3,949
|
Yes i think the surface area affect, i have seen it and tried it with bigger HS ... thats why the number of fins actually affect the over all performance ...
And also the surface mast be veeery smooth for better contact with the CPU, other point ...
Regards  |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 01:31 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Springfield,Mo
Posts: 596
|
Right on target. Thats why all the fins  to increase the radiation area (surface) When you add air movement you increase the transfer away from the source
__________________
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it
|
| |
December 6th, 2001, 04:15 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Australia
Posts: 2,737
|
Well I'd say it's more a combination of things, primarily the conductance of heat is most important, then having a large surface area helps to conduct more heat simultaneously and also combined with active cooling help to remove it faster, it's a combination. |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 07:50 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Bloomingdale IL
Posts: 1,669
|
If you gain perfomance then why don't overclockers cross cut their heatsink? Like this
original
----------------
----------------
----------------
Cut like this
+++++++++
+++++++++
+++++++++ |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 07:55 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 309
|
I'd guess that the cross cut might restrict airflow. I think that would counteract any potential benefit gained by the increased surface area. |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 08:04 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Tokyo-Japan
Posts: 3,949
|
I think IMO tthat it might cost more on production .. then it about seems the same to me .. even if you cross cut it ..
<edit> also how about rounded columns HS .. it also gives good results ..
Last edited by KenKun : December 6th, 2001 at 08:19 AM.
|
| |
December 6th, 2001, 08:17 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 196
|
Surface area does determine how fast heat will be transferred between two systems. The amount of heat that can be transferred into the surrounding air, for example, will increase with a greater amount of air touching the heatsink. There are two extremes though. If your heatsink has lots of surface area but little mass then you will not draw heat from the CPU fast enough. If your heatsink is larger than your CPU then there will be areas of it that do not get hot because the heat will dissipate before it gets there.
Air conducts heat very slowly in comparison to the CPU to heatsink. That's why there is a fan on top of the heatsink. It increases the volume of air that touches the surface of the metal by pushing away air that has been saturated with heat and replacing it with cooler air that will more readily take heat from the heatsink.
I'm sure that there are physics websites that can explain this better than I can, and they probably have formulas to back it up.
That's my 2.5 cents. |
| |
December 6th, 2001, 08:59 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Ipswich Suffolk UK
Posts: 1,110
|
I thingk gwinters has it about right, yes a larger surface area will improve the HS/fan assemblys ability to move heat, but only up to a limit.
If your HS is only warm to the touch, then you probably have a large enough area.
G
__________________
Nothing moves faster than goalposts.
|
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |