August 24th, 2003, 04:19 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Central Europe
Posts: 64
|
Now I am sooooo confused.I still don't know is Athlon better than P4 in gaming.
Athlon XP 512kb,L2,Barton,333mhz
vs.
CPU Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHz 512KB Cache, 478-pin BUS 800 MHz BOX
or
CPU Intel Pentium 4 2.53 GHz 512KB Cache, 478-pin BUS 533 MHz BOX
or
CPU Intel Pentium 4 2.6 GHz 512KB Cache, 478-pin BUS 800 MHz BOX
Please help me out.Just want a processor that is best in gaming from this list. |
| |
August 24th, 2003, 07:37 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Guest
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,200
|
The best CPU for gaming in the list is the 2.6 Ghz 800 FSB, on stock HSF that 2.6 will reach 2.9 to 3.0 Ghz.
If I was you I would just buy the 2.4 800 FSB and OC to 2.8. Its much cheaper to, but if your out to save money then the Barton 2500+ will do fine in games. http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproduc...116-157&DEPA=1 |
| |
August 24th, 2003, 10:58 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: University of Michig
Posts: 271
|
buy the 2.4c; average overclocks are between 3.2-3.4; i'm at 3.4 myself. |
| |
August 25th, 2003, 01:32 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Guest
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,200
|
I agree, go with the 2.4C. |
| |
August 25th, 2003, 01:40 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 45
|
definitely choose the 2.4c. pair it with good DDR and 3ghz should be easy..
cuz it has a lower multiplier, so i believe its a better choice than the 2.6, 2.8c etc.. and its cheaper..
you'll be able to get like 1000fsb off it, and that is alll good.
But if you wanted to save money get an nForce 2 mobo with a Barton 2500+ cpu, cheap as, and pretty quick.. but cant o/c by too much. |
| |
August 25th, 2003, 01:44 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Guest
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,200
|
You can OC pretty well with the barton 2500, but I can stand how people OC their bartons and say cool now its a 3200+ lol assuming it would run better then a P4 3.2 C LOL!!
If you want to save money then the Barton is the best decision, if your ackin for performance then get teh 2.4 C. |
| |
August 25th, 2003, 04:28 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: California
Posts: 504
|
I'd stay away from the 533 MHz FSB P4's with the 800 MHz ones out now, you're going to see better overall system performance with an 800 MHz FSB system. If you're not planning on overclocking, and could use the additional money elsewhere in the system, then you're probably going to want to go with the 2500+ Barton. Grab yourself some good RAM, and a good nForce2 board and you should be set. If you have the money to spend on the system, then going with a P4 2.6C on a good quality Intel 865PE or 875P motherboard may be what you want.
This is all assuming you won't be overclocking any, or won't be doing MUCH overclocking. Either way, with a good video card you'd probably be set to game for some time to come.
__________________
"I was absolutely astounded that something like a Chee-to could become a pop icon," said Evans. "It's international. I've even seen it online on a Russian site." |
| |
August 25th, 2003, 04:32 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Kalispell, Montana
Posts: 1,675
|
I personaly would go with AMD. But the new p4's are really nice(for intel's) That 800Mhz damn
__________________
Urban is back.
And yes that is how you spell my name. I am living proof that 2+2=5
dontforget/rgdesb
|
| |
August 25th, 2003, 01:46 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: May 2003 Location: Columbia, Maryland
Posts: 1,638
|
Deja vu! I was in this exact position a little over a week ago. I went with the Intel P4 2.4C Ghz and the ABIT IS7 board with dual Corsairs for 512 MB. I expect it to arrive today. What a difference a week will make
Robert
__________________
"The philosphy of one century is the common sense of the next"
|
| |
August 25th, 2003, 01:58 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,721
|
IMO most games will run fine in a 1.5 GHZ CPU, I think that if you want great game experience the Video Card is indeed more important than the processor. Many people want the best thing and buy those extremely expensive CPU's like the Intel 3.2 one. I would say to those people:
"What a waste of Money"
Not because its bad, its an extremely powerful CPU, because almost everything today runs fine with a 1.5 GHZ CPU. I f I was in that position I would spend the bucks in a cheaper CPU and the rest left spend it on something else (Like a Nice Video Card). H&h, can I ask you a question: What Video Card do you have?
If you are really wanting to buy a CPU from that list, I agree with most here, get the P4 2.4 800MHZ. Well, these are just my opinions, I myself have a nice PIII 1.4 GHZ running like a Porche!  (But compared to the P4 2.4 it runs like a beetle!  ) but for what I do I dont need a better CPU, its just fine for me.
dan |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |