home hardware prices news articles forums photos user reviews
Go Back   Tech Support Forums - TechIMO.com > PC Hardware and Tech > Storage Related
Join TechIMO for Free!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Reply Get bargains at  »  Dealighted.com
 
Thread Tools
Currently Active Users: 1534
Discussions: 186,731, Posts: 2,228,340, Members: 230,391
Free Scan: Update Your PC's Outdated Drivers to Optimize Performance
Old February 4th, 2007, 06:00 AM   Digg it!   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
muarrif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 430
Send a message via MSN to muarrif Send a message via Yahoo to muarrif Send a message via Skype™ to muarrif
Question
Vista Raid 0+1 or Raid 5? Striker Extreme

I need some help please.

I have 4 x 120GB SATA drives

previously i was using RAID 0 and RAID 1 with XP so that I had performance setup for operating system and Striping for storage.

I am installing VISTA now and my new motherboard has the support for RAID 5. Do you think I will benifit from using this or shall I stick to RAID 0

I was reading the following and it says the random write performance is only fair! does that mean it would be slower than RAID-0



System Specs:

Motherboard: ASUS Striker Extreme
Processor: Intel® Core™2 Extreme Quad-Core Processor
Memory: 4GB (4x 1GB) DDR2
Graphics: NVIDIA® GeForce 8800GTX
Hard Drive: 4x 120GB SATA drives (Seagate)


muarrif is offline   Reply With Quote
TechIMO.com Ads - Login or register for less ads.
How many errors does your computer have?

You no longer need to guess! This free stability scan and registry cleaner download will give you a complete diagnosis of your Windows registry, identifying errors and conflicts.

FREE instant scan


Guest, Register Free! to remove this ad and get your tech support questions answered in minutes!
Old February 4th, 2007, 08:44 AM     #2 (permalink)
to F@H or not to F@H ?
 
Cmptr-Gy-Dv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 4,111
Well here are my thoughts on the subject,
There is a big difference between backup and storage,
You only need backup if the files are changing all the time, then raid 1 would be Useful,
If you’re changing files, like writing a book or doing accounting,
Or some kind of work at home, then you need backup,

If you’re saving pictures, games, programs you use,
Then you don’t really need backup, you need storage,
And then raid1 is not what you need,

Raid 1 will use all 4 of your drives all the time, and you lose half your storage
Capacity, if you run raid0 on 2 drives or even 3 drives, then you not only gain
Some performance, but your storage drive is not being used all
The time, so it will last much longer, depending on how often you need
To excess the storage drive,
I run 2 sata drives in raid0 and use an IDE drive for storage,
I find it works out well for my needs,
__________________
i'm folding for techimo!! what are you doing?

Cmptr-Gy-Dv is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 4th, 2007, 09:55 AM     #3 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
pullmyfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Camas, Washington St
Posts: 3,030
Send a message via MSN to pullmyfoot
but the more you put in raid 0 the more likely one of them is gonna fail, resulting in your data being lost. if you have 3 drives compared to 1, your chances of one failing is higher. raid 5 is slower than raid 0, but its faster than raid 1 and no raid at all.
__________________
5200+X2 @ 3.12Ghz | AC Freezer Pro | Gigabyte 790GX | 2 gigs OCZ Reper | Saphire HD4850 @ 700Mhz/1045Mhz | 22" Samsung
3600+X2 @ 2.6Ghz | Gigabyte 570i | XFX 7600GT SLI

pullmyfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 4th, 2007, 10:01 AM     #4 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
famosbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,797
Blog Entries: 1
Use RAID 0 for performance, but if one hard drive goes down, you are done since there aren't any parity information and just striping.

Use RAID 1 if you want a lot of fault tolerance. RAID 1 mirrors one hard drive to another, so if one should fail, your system will keep on going like nothing happened. This will degradate performance since you are doing everything twice.

Use RAID 5 for performance and fault tolerance. You will need at least 3 hard drives. All hard drives contain parity bits to rebuild a failed hard drive if one should go wrong. It also stripes all of the data for better performance. In this one, if make sure you use hard drives of all the same size or you will waste space since RAID 5 will only recognize the storage capacity of the lowest hard drive on all of the hard drives in this array regardless of size.

Most people who use array technology at home uses RAID 0 for systems and program files and an third drive for storage...JUST LIKE COMPUTER GUY DAVE said.

Famos
famosbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2007, 08:04 AM     #5 (permalink)
Member
 
muarrif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 430
Send a message via MSN to muarrif Send a message via Yahoo to muarrif Send a message via Skype™ to muarrif
Arrow
RAID-0 & RAID-1

Thanks guys for all your help.

I have decided to go for the following configuration:

4x 120GB SATA drives

2x 120GB in RAID-0 configuration (running OS and programs)
2x 120GB in RAID-1 configuration (For storage and back up)
muarrif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2007, 05:13 PM     #6 (permalink)
to F@H or not to F@H ?
 
Cmptr-Gy-Dv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 4,111
That is exactly what I would have done,
Good choice,
speed and redundancy, can’t go wrong with that,
Cmptr-Gy-Dv is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 13th, 2007, 01:08 PM     #7 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
famosbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,797
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cmptr-Gy-Dv View Post
That is exactly what I would have done,
Good choice,
speed and redundancy, can’t go wrong with that,
Agreed...good choice. Nice way to utilize what your machine can do. I still haven't implemented or used most of the advanced features of my motherboard yet ...waste of 200 bucks .
famosbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 29th, 2007, 02:50 PM     #8 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1
My questions........

Please some advices on changing the set up of my system.

My system:
Dimension E520nIntel® Core 2 E6420 Duo Processor(4MB L2 cache,2.13GHZ,1066FSB)
Memory
1GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz- 2DIMMs + 2GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz- 2DIMMs = 3GB
Video Cards
256MB nVidia Geforce 7300LE TurboCache
Network Interface
Integrated 10/100 Ethernet
DVD Drive
48X CD-RW/ DVD Combo Drive
Sound Cards
Integrated 7.1 Channel Audio
Hard Drives:1)250GB Serial ATA Hard Drive (7200RPM) (OS)
2) 750GB Serial ATA Hard Drive (7200RPM)
Operating System Vista Ultimate 32bit
This system with two HD (250G and 750G) is running slow and the actual set-up is with No RAID.
Question: Changing to RAID is going to speed up the system?
Which type of RAID has best performance (0; 1)?
How do I change the setting??

Thanks guys
jabilspt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 30th, 2007, 01:06 AM     #9 (permalink)
Super F@D Folder
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,004
Send a message via AIM to sr71000
To effectively run raid you need the same drives. Your motherboard also needs to support it!

If you take two similar drives, and use raid 1 is protects your data (at half the storage space). If you use raid 0, you get the full storage space of the two drives, but some speed improvement. A lot of the posts before say if you run raid 0 and lost a drive you might lose some data.....if you lose just 1 drive in a raid 0 array you lose EVERYTHING on that array! Also..when you have a new question like this...instead of digging up old posts or using other peoples threads you can create new topics They your question is right up at the very top and doesn't get missed! Gets your questions answered quicker!!
sr71000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Motherboard Purchase: KT333 with raid or KT400 with software raid Eladijaz Motherboards 2 January 6th, 2003 03:02 PM
How does W2k (and XP?) RAID compare to dedicated RAID controllers? John Prophet Storage Related 2 August 14th, 2002 03:19 AM
Please recommend an U160 scsi raid controller for Raid 0/5 plucky duck Storage Related 4 June 3rd, 2002 11:55 PM
KR7A-RAID & MSI 6380 KT266A RAID Pro RU owners, What do you think about your board ? PowerMarkymark Motherboards 14 March 2nd, 2002 03:37 PM
MSI K7T266 Pro Raid setup as non raid msterzer Motherboards 8 December 8th, 2001 07:02 PM

Most Active Discussions
Is It Just Me? (747)
Newegg WARS!!! (55)
Best graphics card for around $600 (8)
E5200 15.2GHZ?? (12)
Car Talk! (8693)
Folderchat: The Holiday thread (159)
New info on the Phenom II X4 (46)
Best Boot Drive Imaging Software (17)
Bought an AGP "HIS Radeon HD 3.. (21)
Recent Discussions
replacing tvs msp345 printer he.. (1)
LCD monitor sizes and wide scre.. (4)
Service Pack 3 (3)
Should I build my computer arou.. (0)
Computer won't start (15)
E5200 15.2GHZ?? (12)
Folderchat: The Holiday thread (159)
Best graphics card for around $.. (8)
Logitech Mx 3200? (1)
Apple iPod touch 16 GB $200 (5)
FS: Dell 6000 laptop, modded 36.. (3)
Selling Rockband Bundle, Xbox s.. (2)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 AM.
TechIMO Copyright 2008 All Enthusiast, Inc.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28