+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    421

    SSD slowing down remedys

     
    When a ssd drive starts to slow down will a reformat bring it back to normal?

    Simple question that i cant seem to find a answer to with searches
    EVGA Classified/I920 4Ghz/EVGA 295gtx/XFI SoundBlaster/OCZ 750 PSU/Raptor Hd's/CoolMaster Cosmos S

  2. #2
    Goverment property now GroundZero3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    33,809
    Blog Entries
    46
    What slowdowns are you experiencing? Slow downs with the OS itself?

  3. #3
    Millwright stroyal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    8,059
    It is just common sense.
    What slows down a mechanical hard drive, will also effect an SSD.
    A corrupt operating system.
    I just won't be as dramatic, as it would take a lot more corruption. and spyware to slow it down.

    The only difference between the 2 in this scenario, is speed.

    The SSD still has to read all that crap, that slows down a mechanical drive, over time.
    It just does it faster.
    If you get rid of the crap, with a format, and a reinstall, it doesn't have to read all that crap, just like the mechanical drive.
    Hard Sayin Not Knowin

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    421
    Thank You, so there is no downside to raiding these being that i can just reformat every now and then and bring them back up to par.
    EVGA Classified/I920 4Ghz/EVGA 295gtx/XFI SoundBlaster/OCZ 750 PSU/Raptor Hd's/CoolMaster Cosmos S

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    I have read that SSD drives do slow down after awhile from not getting rid of the trash collection, I guess your suppose to let the computer sit for awhile for trash collection to start up. With Windows 7 threes is a thing called TRIM which greatly increases a drive's performance.

    I just ordered an ADATA 128 GB SSD drive and will be using Win XP 64. XP does not have TRIM ability so I'm a little SOL there, but I bought the ADATA drive knowing it has a Sandforce chipset which is supposed to be better at garbage collection. Except with a Sandforce chipset they provision 8 GB of space plus take into considering what the real size of the 128 GB drive is and your at 111 GB.

    Run this and uncheck all settings |MG| SSD Tweaker 1.9.8 Download

  6. #6
    Millwright stroyal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    8,059
    Probably not, but you may want to look up SSD RAID TRIM.
    I don't know enough about it to explain, but formatting would fix that also

    SSD have a finite number of times they can be written to, but from what I have read, that could be longer than the life of a mechanical drive.

    It is probably not cost effective, as 1 SSD, is going to be pretty fast, and 1 is pretty pricy.
    Hard Sayin Not Knowin

  7. #7
    Millwright stroyal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    8,059
    I came across this article, on synchronous, and asynchronous flash memory in SSDs.
    Apparently drives with synchronous, are basically twice as fast, but a little more expensive.
    It also sounds like they do RAID0 better.
    Introduction - NAND Flash Faces Off - Synchronous vs. Asynchronous | [H]ard|OCP
    Last edited by stroyal; August 8th, 2011 at 03:49 PM.
    Hard Sayin Not Knowin

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    Oh, how I wish I had a SATA 3 controller. Maybe I should find out about a SATA 3 PCI card.

    Edit- Looks like they are all for PCI-E I only have one PCi-E 16 and the others are PCI-E x1


    Actually, this one looks like PCI-E x1 Newegg.com - SYBA SY-PEX40039 PCI-Express 2.0 SATA III (6.0Gb/s) Controller Card
    Last edited by Taxmancometh; August 8th, 2011 at 08:46 PM.

  9. #9
    Millwright stroyal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    8,059
    You would think something like the interface, would be listed.

    Sounds like they are comparing apples, and oranges. (version,vs interface)
    Quote:
    Compliant with PCI-Express Specification V2.0 and Backward Compatible with PCI-Express 1.x.
    edit
    or do they mean V1.0
    Hard Sayin Not Knowin

  10. #10
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Taxmancometh View Post
    Oh, how I wish I had a SATA 3 controller. Maybe I should find out about a SATA 3 PCI card.

    Edit- Looks like they are all for PCI-E I only have one PCi-E 16 and the others are PCI-E x1


    Actually, this one looks like PCI-E x1 Newegg.com - SYBA SY-PEX40039 PCI-Express 2.0 SATA III (6.0Gb/s) Controller Card
    I started reading your reply and was going to say, but I see you found out.

    Your not going to find any PCI Cards like that, and even PCIe x1 will have to be 2.0 bandwidth as well. SATA 6Gbps Needs 2.0 x1 or better, realistically. as its at least 500MB/s bandwidth (1.0 was only 250MB/s), which is still faster than PCI in most cases, which is only between 133 & 533 MB/s depending on the type of PCI in the case.

    133 MB/s (32-bit at 33 MHz)
    266 MB/s (32-bit at 66 MHz or 64-bit at 33 MHz)
    533 MB/s (64-bit at 66 MHz)

    (taken from Wikipedia)

    factor in PCI is shared on all the slots and those figures can drop like a rock.
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  11. #11
    PC Upgrade Procrastinator ShyguyXPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    17,377
    Quote Originally Posted by stroyal View Post
    You would think something like the interface, would be listed.

    Sounds like they are comparing apples, and oranges. (version,vs interface)
    Quote:
    Compliant with PCI-Express Specification V2.0 and Backward Compatible with PCI-Express 1.x.
    edit
    or do they mean V1.0
    Yes, 1.x means 1.0 & 1.1 is covered.
    i7 940//Corsair H60//EVGA X58 SLI LE//6GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz//2x EVGA GTX 560 Ti FPB SLI//NZXT Hale82 850W//CM 690 II Advanced//Win7 64//WD 74GB V-raptor, 750GB Black, 1.5TB Green

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KFNL FS2004
    Posts
    11,886
    Blog Entries
    1
    So I have one PCI-E 16x occupied, what can I expect for the speed of a SATA 3 controller in a PCI-E 1x slot? Here's my motherboard. Newegg.com - GIGABYTE GA-965P-DS3 (rev. 1.3) LGA 775 Intel P965 Express ATX Intel Motherboard

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Stripping 2 to 3 SSD or 1 Ultra fast SSD
    By AndreL in forum Storage Related
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 17th, 2009, 07:31 AM
  2. Computer is slowing down now
    By joeschmo88 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: September 25th, 2006, 06:28 PM
  3. WinXP slowing down
    By kenboyles72 in forum Applications and Operating Systems
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 25th, 2005, 07:18 PM
  4. cold remedys fast
    By project vegas in forum IMO Community
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: June 15th, 2005, 01:49 PM
  5. Slowing down mp3
    By Brainchild in forum Multimedia and Audio
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: December 10th, 2003, 06:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Recommended Sites: ResellerRatings Store Reviews