May 12th, 2008, 07:55 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 16
|
i'm not sure how to use it.do i put it on the chip or around the chip? |
| |
May 12th, 2008, 08:00 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Instigator
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Healdsburg, CA
Posts: 9,719
|
__________________
Chappaquiddick 1 - Dick Cheney 0
|
| |
May 13th, 2008, 11:11 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Oaxaca, Mexico
Posts: 252
|
I just got a new processor, an Intel dual-core, and it doesn't require thermal paste. I've been checking temps and am happy with the performance. |
| |
May 13th, 2008, 01:09 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Unbearable member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: inside the Beltway
Posts: 4,742
|
"Doesn't require thermal paste" because the Intel retail heatsink/fan came with a thermal pad? Or are you not using anything at all? |
| |
May 13th, 2008, 03:47 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Oaxaca, Mexico
Posts: 252
|
This is from the Intel website:
"The fan heatsink included with the boxed Intel processor must be securely attached to the processor. Thermal interface material (preapplied attached to the bottom of the heatsink) provides effective heat transfer from the processor to the fan heatsink." http://www.intel.com/cd/channel/rese...eng/299986.htm |
| |
May 13th, 2008, 03:58 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | The Ninja Mod
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Outside the box
Posts: 4,054
|
There is a lot of difference between "preapplied" and doesn't require. You've got it already so that means obviously you didn't need to add any, that doesn't mean it doesn't require it.
I've ran a couple athlon cpu's short term w/o any at all, w/o issues. The temps where a little high but nothing that would cause problems. However I would recommend it simply adding some AS3 cut temps in those case by a fairly good amount.
__________________ “Every question involves someone having to work for an answer, isn't it about time you did your share”
"The true measure of a man is the degree to which he has managed to subjugate his ego." |
| |
May 13th, 2008, 06:18 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Oaxaca, Mexico
Posts: 252
|
I consider "thermal paste" and "thermal interface material" to be two different things. One is a paste that is squeezed from a little tube and applied, frequently too generously, to the heatsink. The "thermal interface material" appears to be metal. I suspect putting paste on this metal would not be a good idea. |
| |
May 13th, 2008, 07:12 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Instigator
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Healdsburg, CA
Posts: 9,719
|
The pre-applied "thermal interface material" referred to in that document is "thermal paste". There are many different types and consistencies. The stuff that is factory applied tends to be thicker than the typical store bought "tube" of thermal paste. |
| |
May 18th, 2008, 09:30 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6,081
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick I consider "thermal paste" and "thermal interface material" to be two different things. One is a paste that is squeezed from a little tube and applied, frequently too generously, to the heatsink. The "thermal interface material" appears to be metal. I suspect putting paste on this metal would not be a good idea. | Since when is a waxy substance considered metal?
You're right about one thing, you aren't suppose to put paste on it. If you use another compound you're suppose to remove the one that is pre-applied.
__________________
"Opinions not based on knowledge are ugly things"
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |