December 10th, 2002, 01:52 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: White Rock, Canada
Posts: 2,238
| [ECC2] - Official Linux Client
The long awaited client is available for download  eCompute Link
| 
|  | |
December 10th, 2002, 01:57 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Mean Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: N of Music City, USA
Posts: 7,794
|
I guess you just didn't like mine?  Link
| |
| | |
December 10th, 2002, 02:08 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: White Rock, Canada
Posts: 2,238
|
Ya, not enough detail
I am trying to get caught up with all the threads I missed but from what I heard ECC2 RULEZ
| |
| | |
December 10th, 2002, 07:07 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 9
| Quote: Originally posted by EvilRick
I guess you just didn't like mine?
Link | thats the one I have been using. when you compiled the core what verison did you end up with? I have core v.095 and cli wrapper v 0.3b | |
| | |
December 10th, 2002, 07:38 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Uncommon Man
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: State College, PA
Posts: 4,284
|
Yay, well I've finally got an actual Linux executable running, although I did make about 1000 points on this machine under WINE  .
It's still a tad slower, but soo much easier to renice one process than 8...
Sam | |
| | |
December 14th, 2002, 07:21 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,542
|
Yess!! Runs like a dream... (~30 slower than running under wine, tho... wonder why that is?) | |
| | |
December 14th, 2002, 06:30 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Go back to sleep
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Switzerland
Posts: 5,960
|
thanks for the link!
^bump^ for the other linux user!
Creatures
__________________
Knowledge Is Power
| |
| | |
December 14th, 2002, 07:14 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Iowa
Posts: 720
|
__________________
Free DMcOwen674! [l]http://www.tacube.com/pages/mcowen.html[/l]
| |
| | |
December 14th, 2002, 09:37 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 9
|
if you look they are the same linux client. as for the wine and windows verison just because it shows a higher iterations per second doesn't mean it is. If someone runs one for a week than the other for another week which one got the most dp's is the one I would assume to be faster. | |
| | |
December 14th, 2002, 09:46 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,542
| As res0r9lm says, the ecompute.org page just points to FeLine's version.
I have a feeling the windows client probably is faster - likely the code was optimised for their compiler and not for gcc. Hopefully we'll be seeing optimised clients soon (and athlon optimised clients! pretty please?)
It's fairly easy to get the wine version working, but seeing as I can't get it to work without X, I reckon the native client will be better suited for cows (headless ones in particular...) | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | 
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | |   Most Active Discussions  | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | 
|
hardware
prices 
![[ECC2] - Official Linux Client](http://www.techimo.com/forum/iconimages/distributed-computing/ecc2-official-linux-client_ltr.gif){kind=small}
viz
