+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Ultimate Member osprey4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    11,368

    Court: FCC has no power to regulate Net neutrality

     
    Posted on CNET

    Because the FCC "has failed to tie its assertion" of regulatory authority to any actual law enacted by Congress, the agency does not have the authority to regulate an Internet provider's network management practices, wrote Judge David Tatel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
    The FCC over-reaching? What a surprise.

  2. #2
    Super Stealthy Moderator RicheemxX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    8,489
    Blog Entries
    4
    The FCC over-reaching yeah but this could be bad news for the consumer. I don't think anyone wants Comcast or any other ISP to have free reign over how they handle the net, at least I know I don't

    TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!
    “Because The People Who Are Crazy Enough To Think They Can Change The World, Are The Ones Who Do.”

  3. #3
    Ultimate Member thephilosophizer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,582
    Yeah I wouldn't call it over reaching if what there are doing is actually protecting free access (as in uncensored, not costless) to the internet.
    I for one don't like the precedent, I and really do hope that congress can act quickly to give this authority to the FCC, lest we end up with internet like they have in china, exception controlled by corporations instead of government.
    Reason obeys itself; and ignorance does whatever is dictated to it.
    -Thomas Paine

  4. #4
    Nothing To See Here butch81385's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    15,092
    So, I am allowed to charge you for 100Mbps service, but hide in my fine print (or not tell you anywhere for a while) that "certain applications" will be throttled back? Hmm... I'm sorry, but all port 80 traffic gets throttled back by default. Also, as an extra precaution we throttle back internet browsers, online games, etc...


    Ugly precedent indeed...
    I don't like signatures.

  5. #5
    Ultimate Member osprey4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    11,368
    No, Butch, an ugly precedent is when the government tries to enforce a rule that does not exist.

    But this author says the FCC will have the last laugh.

    Or, ironically, the FCC could reclassify broadband as a telecommunications service, treating Internet access companies as it would telephone providers, which would put carriers like Comcast even more under the FCC’s thumb. My bet is on the latter, and if that is the case, Comcast may quickly start kicking itself for every getting into a position where this could happen. And that could be one of the best things for growth of the Internet that could happen.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What's next if DC Court says FCC has no power over ISPs
    By nemowolf in forum Tech News Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: February 15th, 2010, 01:23 PM
  2. Droid-buddies Verizon and Google offer net neutrality truce
    By nemowolf in forum Mobile Computing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 19th, 2010, 01:42 PM
  3. Net Neutrality: What's the big deal?
    By gberz3 in forum Networking and Internet
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: January 17th, 2007, 01:24 AM
  4. U.S. court nixes Net music subpoenas
    By sixf00t4 in forum IMO Community
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 19th, 2003, 07:26 PM
  5. Neutrality
    By ClubMed in forum IMO Community
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: December 2nd, 2002, 08:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Recommended Sites: ResellerRatings Store Reviews