-
April 6th, 2010, 12:51 PM #1
Court: FCC has no power to regulate Net neutrality
Posted on CNET
The FCC over-reaching? What a surprise.Because the FCC "has failed to tie its assertion" of regulatory authority to any actual law enacted by Congress, the agency does not have the authority to regulate an Internet provider's network management practices, wrote Judge David Tatel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
-
April 6th, 2010, 02:39 PM #2
The FCC over-reaching yeah but this could be bad news for the consumer. I don't think anyone wants Comcast or any other ISP to have free reign over how they handle the net, at least I know I don't
TechIMO Folding@home Team #111 - Crunching for the cure!
“Because The People Who Are Crazy Enough To Think They Can Change The World, Are The Ones Who Do.”
-
April 6th, 2010, 02:45 PM #3
Yeah I wouldn't call it over reaching if what there are doing is actually protecting free access (as in uncensored, not costless) to the internet.
I for one don't like the precedent, I and really do hope that congress can act quickly to give this authority to the FCC, lest we end up with internet like they have in china, exception controlled by corporations instead of government.Reason obeys itself; and ignorance does whatever is dictated to it.
-Thomas Paine
-
April 6th, 2010, 02:55 PM #4
So, I am allowed to charge you for 100Mbps service, but hide in my fine print (or not tell you anywhere for a while) that "certain applications" will be throttled back? Hmm... I'm sorry, but all port 80 traffic gets throttled back by default. Also, as an extra precaution we throttle back internet browsers, online games, etc...
Ugly precedent indeed...I don't like signatures.
-
April 7th, 2010, 07:45 AM #5
No, Butch, an ugly precedent is when the government tries to enforce a rule that does not exist.
But this author says the FCC will have the last laugh.
Or, ironically, the FCC could reclassify broadband as a telecommunications service, treating Internet access companies as it would telephone providers, which would put carriers like Comcast even more under the FCC’s thumb. My bet is on the latter, and if that is the case, Comcast may quickly start kicking itself for every getting into a position where this could happen. And that could be one of the best things for growth of the Internet that could happen.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
What's next if DC Court says FCC has no power over ISPs
By nemowolf in forum Tech News DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: February 15th, 2010, 01:23 PM -
Droid-buddies Verizon and Google offer net neutrality truce
By nemowolf in forum Mobile ComputingReplies: 0Last Post: January 19th, 2010, 01:42 PM -
Net Neutrality: What's the big deal?
By gberz3 in forum Networking and InternetReplies: 5Last Post: January 17th, 2007, 01:24 AM -
U.S. court nixes Net music subpoenas
By sixf00t4 in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 3Last Post: December 19th, 2003, 07:26 PM -
Neutrality
By ClubMed in forum IMO CommunityReplies: 37Last Post: December 2nd, 2002, 08:35 PM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote


It depends. If she is an employee then she is probably taking advice from an "appointed" lawyer who is protecting the IRS. It will soon be her own personal lawyer, since she is likely to be charged...
IRS Lois Lerner Refuses to Resign