April 25th, 2005, 02:07 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,608
| Intranet site and front page.
I am currently working on an Intranet site for my company. I am not great at HTML coding by hand and i have Frontpage 2003 at my disposal. Is there a major disadvantage to using FP 2003? I figure i might as well us it since it is already paid for. And, i will likely be hosting it internaly on IIS 6.0.
Suggestions, comments?
__________________
"Life moves pretty fast, if you dont stop to look around once in a while, you could miss it." -FB
|
| |
April 25th, 2005, 02:22 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Unregistered
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 423
|
FrontPage 2003 is cool
it's like vb  |
| |
April 25th, 2005, 02:30 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Supporting our military
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Bottom left of U.S.
Posts: 9,194
|
Nothing wrong with FrontPage 2003.
Just my  .
Bill
__________________
*****
It is easy to be conspicuously "compassionate" if others are being forced to pay the cost. – Murray N. Rothbard
|
| |
April 25th, 2005, 08:58 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,349
|
FrontPage.... Bad memories... Although I used 2000, So it might have changed... I remember 2000 used to mess up my HTML pretty badly. Maybe 2003 is better. Dreamweaver still owns all though :P
__________________
23. That's the number of people Mr. T has pitied in the time it has taken you to read this sentence.
|
| |
April 25th, 2005, 09:44 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | is 4 f00t secks
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Da Burgh
Posts: 4,509
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by cryptoguy I remember 2000 used to mess up my HTML pretty badly. | nope, still does it  |
| |
April 25th, 2005, 04:41 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,608
|
yeah, i have heard that FP still puts alot of junk in the HTML stuff. but i figure that since i am going to be hosting it internally, then i wont have to worry about any lag time or anything with all that extra code in there. Plus, from what i have read, FP 2K3 has some good stuff added to it for functionality. Its not perfect but should fit my needs. |
| |
April 25th, 2005, 04:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Best To Avoid Me
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Under Your Bed
Posts: 8,596
|
FP2003 is just fine, don't listen to these clean HTML clowns!
Plus, you can go into split mode where it shows the HTML code up top, while displaying the page on the bottom half...easy to navigate through your code...if you click on any part of your page, the related code is automatically highlighted at the top. Easy to clean up if you wanted to. If not, you'll be fine. |
| |
April 25th, 2005, 07:28 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,349
|
Just make sure you know your HTML... |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | Photos on the front page...AGAIN! | OuTpaTienT | Suggestion Box | 27 | August 15th, 2005 12:33 PM | | Front Page | Sirnarfness | Applications and Operating Systems | 5 | May 14th, 2004 07:18 PM | | front page express??? | alondra | Applications and Operating Systems | 3 | June 11th, 2003 03:36 AM | | Front Page ?? | galehickey | General Tech Discussion | 1 | April 29th, 2003 07:46 AM | | front page .dll | pj7 | Technical Support | 3 | April 29th, 2002 08:54 AM | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |