Best Way to Create Website?  | | |
December 12th, 2005, 11:46 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: NW burbs of Chicago
Posts: 838
| Best Way to Create Website?
Ok, whats the best way to make a website. I know HTML pretty good, but its a little boring you know? I have access to both FrontPage and Dreamweaver. Im just looking to create a small business site. Its mostly just for knowledge, because i want to learn something new. Which one is easier to use and/or makes better pages?
thanks alot |
| |
December 13th, 2005, 09:39 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 752
|
well....theres lots of stuff for making sites, like xhtml,php,java script,..im pretty shore java script is for like not writing a site more to make it do stuff like it be interactive.i dont really know alot about this stuff but ill ask a friend who has a couple sites. |
| |
December 13th, 2005, 09:55 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 1,352
|
i have used frontpage before. it is relativley straight forward and easy to use, however dreamweaver is the prefered choice of many. i know it has a lot more features and i hear it is easy to use as well. my vote, dreamweaver. |
| |
December 13th, 2005, 10:33 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 20
|
I am a webmaster in the US military. For a static website, elthought I knot HTML and XHTML and could do it in notepad, I prefer Dreamweaver as it is intuitive and powerful. If you need dynamic features, such as database polling or user management, I would HIGHLY recommend learning PHP and use a PHP/MySQL server. PHP is easy and fun to use. |
| |
December 13th, 2005, 10:54 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Steeler Fan
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 3,252
|
If you have access to both, then try them both. Dreamweaver has my vote but I am not skilled in .html. |
| |
December 13th, 2005, 12:53 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Not Really a Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 25,378
|
Try to avoid frontpage... its typically not used in corporate and produces POOR code built primarily for IE.
Dreamweaver produces more compatible code for alternative browsers. |
| |
December 13th, 2005, 02:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 4,698
|
Yeah, avoid Frontpage if possible. It will setup the pages to look good in IE and have slight inconsistencies with other browsers.
The web admin here prefers Dreamweaver and using straightup HTML.
__________________
AMD Phenom Q9500 Quad-Core 2.2ghz / Asus M3A78-EMH HDMI / 4GB PC667 RAM / 320GB SATA II
|
| |
December 13th, 2005, 04:49 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,349
|
I hate FrontPage as well. Use Dreamweaver, even though it could be confusing, you will not get problems associated with FrontPage (HTML mess-ups).
__________________
23. That's the number of people Mr. T has pitied in the time it has taken you to read this sentence.
|
| |
December 14th, 2005, 02:53 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 16
|
You can use CGI.pm if you know how to use Perl. But that will require validations of all the fields passed in since you can add Unix commands to a text field by ending the value in a semi-colon then putting in the end.
The best thing is, all code generated by CGI.pm is XHTML 1.0 Trans valid  , which is good if you are making good sites and stuff. But it will also take some time to learn. |
| |
December 14th, 2005, 06:18 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: NW burbs of Chicago
Posts: 838
|
ok, sounds like dreamweaver hahah im going to look into php too it sounds good as well
thanks alot! |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |