.net 3.0  | | 
February 2nd, 2007, 08:56 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Super F@D Folder
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,083
|
Hey. Just wondering if anyones done any development in .net 3.0  just downloading from ms now. Curious to see what people think of it! (stability, speed, and otherwise). | 
|  | |
February 3rd, 2007, 09:54 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Earth
Posts: 420
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sr71000  Hey. Just wondering if anyones done any development in .net 3.0 just downloading from ms now. Curious to see what people think of it! (stability, speed, and otherwise). | I think this is pretty impressive but it requires that .net 3 be installed on the client - getting more like java every day!! LOL!
http://www.xaml.net/ The Snowboarder is .net 3... | |
| | |
February 3rd, 2007, 10:16 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Mobile Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: S. Central PA
Posts: 3,601
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Iturea I think this is pretty impressive but it requires that .net 3 be installed on the client - getting more like java every day!! LOL! http://www.xaml.net/ The Snowboarder is .net 3... | isnt that the same with .Net 2.0 as well? just wondering.. I thought i made an app awhile back in VS '05 and it didnt run on a machine until i updated it to .net 2.0 Im gonna go look at M$ now to download the .Net 3.0. Does visual Studio even take advantage of 3.0? or is that going to be incorporated into a future release?
__________________ Thinkpad T61 14.1" wide | WinXP Pro | C2D T8300 CPU | 3GB DDR2 | 160GB HDD | AGN & WWAN
Lenovo S10 10.2" LED display | 1.6Ghz Atom CPU | 1GB DDR2 | 1.3mp webcam | B/G WiFi | 160GB HDD | |
| | |
February 3rd, 2007, 12:08 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Super F@D Folder
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,083
|
yea. all versions of .net require the .net runtime engine to be installed. Just wondering how 3 compared to two. AFAIK the .net runtime engine comes w/ the compiler...so the visual studios ide can compile to any version of .net you have installed (could be wrong though...but that's what i thought!) | |
| | |
February 3rd, 2007, 06:07 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Earth
Posts: 420
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShuckyD isnt that the same with .Net 2.0 as well? just wondering.. I thought i made an app awhile back in VS '05 and it didnt run on a machine until i updated it to .net 2.0 Im gonna go look at M$ now to download the .Net 3.0. Does visual Studio even take advantage of 3.0? or is that going to be incorporated into a future release? | Well I am refering to server applications - like: http://communityserver.org/Default.aspx
You don't need the .net framework installed on your machine to view this website. The website was created in asp.net, however.
Until now, I have never heard of a web app requiring the .net framework on the client. Thus my amazement of the Snowboarder app. I guess its more like a java applet. You have to have java installed on your machine to run applets, and now you have to have the .net framework installed on your machine to run apps like the snowboard example. HUMMMM. Is this the MS version of a Java applet??? Weird! | |
| | |
February 3rd, 2007, 07:32 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Super F@D Folder
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,083
|
asp.net is a server side scripting language...that means it does require .net to be installed...just on the server instead of on the client! | |
| | |
February 3rd, 2007, 07:41 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Not Really a Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 25,391
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sr71000 asp.net is a server side scripting language...that means it does require .net to be installed...just on the server instead of on the client! | Correct, just like a java server side applet (servelet) requires java on server side, but not client side.
WoW's page uses java on the server side, but doesn't require anything on client side.
__________________
Helicopters don't fly; they vibrate so much and make so much noise that the earth rejects them.
| 
| | |
February 7th, 2007, 11:20 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003 Location: Aus, Gold Coast :)
Posts: 802
|
sounds very cool... might have to wait for VS 2007 or 2008 before i upgrade from 2002 | |
| | |
February 11th, 2007, 09:13 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Mobile Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: S. Central PA
Posts: 3,601
|
does anyone know if Microsoft plans on releasing a new Visual Studio in the next few months? | |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions  | | | | |   Recent Discussions  | | | | |
 |
hardware
prices 
