making a graphicky site resolution friendly  | |
October 2nd, 2002, 10:30 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: www.kingdomta.com
Posts: 192
| making a graphicky site resolution friendly
I use my personal webpage primarily to show photographs, graphics and writing.
I want the pages to have a very graphical flair, but I'm having a heck of a time getting them to look good at all resolutions.
I guess with people setting their own font sizes and resolutions it's impossible to optimize a website to look good on all of them, but are there some tricks to doing a graphics rich page that's various-resolution/font size friendly?
A good example is the current front page. It looks great at 1024x768, but not so hot at lower resolutions.
Thanks for any advice,
SCMT www.kingdomta.com |
| |
October 2nd, 2002, 11:15 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 194
|
i asked the for the most common resolution at tomshardware and it was 1024 x 768
go with the majority. |
| |
October 2nd, 2002, 11:17 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Brisbane, Aus.
Posts: 1,464
|
Yeah, and remeber. If it looks big on 1600x1200 its huge on 640 480
Most of the site i amke fit into 640 by 480
__________________
--
www.theburningcat.com
All Your Cats Are Belong to Us
|
| |
October 2nd, 2002, 11:29 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: www.kingdomta.com
Posts: 192
|
if 1024 x768 is the standard, that's what I'll aim for, but Tom's clientelle all probably know what kind of video card they use, most of the people visiting my site don't have a clue, so 1024 might be the average of a fairly plugged in crowd.
I know I could just centre it and make a small res. design that fits on bigger screens, but it seems kind of barren and corporate-ish. If I'm looking for a more graphics intensive artsie look, I guess I'm going to have to alienate some people.
Thanks for the IMOs. |
| |
October 2nd, 2002, 02:07 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,879
|
I always check the resolution @ 800x600 and @1024x768 ..... 800x600 is the most widely used size of the visitors to my websites.
800x600 52.17%
1024x768 35.02%
640x480 4.32%
1280x1024 3.24%
this is from a site stats of 6000 pageviews. Most of my other sites have similar stats as far as percentages for screen resolution sizes. |
| |
October 2nd, 2002, 02:29 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Muskegon, MI
Posts: 656
|
Id say do it for 1024x768, It might be a little big for the 800x600, but they have scroll bars to handle that. If you make it smaller, there's nothing people with higher resolutions can do to make it looke bigger. |
| |
October 2nd, 2002, 04:05 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: www.kingdomta.com
Posts: 192
|
I think I'll aim for 1024 but include 800.
It's a pain when I'm trying to position background graphics for two different resolutions. Ho-hum, a fault of the medium I guess.
That title page is going to have to not be a surround - maybe clumps of rocks spread around would be more resolution friendly.
Thanks for the input, very useful. www.kingdomta.com |
| |
October 2nd, 2002, 05:33 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 21
|
I think theres a way to set image hieght/width depending on resolution using javascript. Sadly I can't remember how....
You could use javascript to direct people to physically different versions of the webpage too, don't remember how to do that either though..... |
| |
October 2nd, 2002, 05:55 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Ultimate Member
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,758
|
__________________
If you never try anything new,
you will miss out of some of life's many disappointments...
|
| |
October 3rd, 2002, 04:48 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: www.kingdomta.com
Posts: 192
| Quote: Originally posted by edwelly I think it looks fine just the way it is... | Thanks, but now it looks even better, even if my Mum is looking at it at home on her coal driven 486!
Thanks all, great advice. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Most Active Discussions | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |